FOR ANYONE COMING TO THE BRISTOL EVENT
❤13
Signed Stacey

Channel
@staceysworldrocks
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
19,639subscribers
+240 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001440206930 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @staceysworldrocks |
| Description | £5M+ IN REFUNDS •Stop paying Council Tax/Water/Energy/TV licence bills & get refunds Book a call/tickets: https://staceysworldrocks.com *SELF-STUDY *USE SEARCH BAR *READ PINNED INFO/FAQ *APPLIES TO ALL COUNTRIES |
| Created | 31 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/staceysworldrocks |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Nov 2026, 03:06 | 19,639 | -45 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 20:40 | 19,684 | -57 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 09:46 | 19,741 | -35 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 00:59 | 19,776 | -35 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 00:18 | 19,811 | -33 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 01:11 | 19,844 | -15 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 00:17 | 19,859 | -9 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 00:10 | 19,868 | -25 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 23:56 | 19,893 | -21 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 02:17 | 19,914 | -27 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 02:08 | 19,941 | -14 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:05 | 19,955 | -31 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 19:39 | 19,986 | -15 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 20:47 | 20,001 | -30 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:16 | 20,031 | -8 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:59 | 20,039 | -2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:30 | 20,041 | -2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 19:27 | 20,043 | -3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:19 | 20,046 | -3 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:11 | 20,049 | first reading |
46 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 83 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 46 (18 June 2026 – 13 November 2026) |
| Views total | 54,590 |
| Reactions total | 1,205 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Nov 2026, 16:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,643 reactions across 46 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,680 | 63.6% | |
| 👏 | 317 | 12.0% | |
| 💯 | 206 | 7.79% | |
| 👍 | 155 | 5.86% | |
| 🔥 | 141 | 5.33% | |
| 😁 | 86 | 3.25% | |
| 🍾 | 25 | 0.946% | |
| 🙏 | 14 | 0.53% | |
| 🤩 | 8 | 0.303% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 0.189% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.076% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.038% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.038% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.038% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.038% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,643 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (18.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
FOR ANYONE COMING TO THE BRISTOL EVENT
❤13
Signed Stacey
WHO THE FUCK ARE “THE ELITES”? WE ARE. Careful what you tell your conscious and subconscious brain…words cast spells and spells (hence, “spelling”) create the reality you choose to believe, so choose your words carefully. Personally, I’m not going to give power, prestige and status to globalist wankers and bankers. Just a little thought I had, whilst being strapped into a lymphatic massage suit at @thedetox.clini…
❤47👏10💯7🍾1
Signed Stacey
IN-PERSON EVENTS Wed 18th November BRISTOL 6.30-9.30pm £60pp Mon 23rd November MANCHESTER (8x seats left) 6.30-9.30pm £60pp ZOOMS 121s (30 mins £65/1 hour £100 video call, or £100 for 15 mins + group Zoom Thur 12th Nov 10.45am, 12pm, 2.30pm Fri 13th Nov 9.30am, 10.45am, 12pm, 1.15pm Mon 16th Nov 9.30am, 10.45am, 12pm, 1.15pm, 2.30pm, 3.45pm, 5pm, 6.15pm Tues 17th Nov 9.45am, 11am, 12.15pm, 1.30pm, 2.45pm, 4pm…
❤2
Signed Stacey
WHY YOUR CASH ISN’T NEEDED FOR PUBLIC SERVICES Cash is a belief system that we’ve all bought into. But has anyone ever stopped to think about where it comes from, or why all your notes from an ATM are freshly printed? Anyone want to take a trip to Debden, Essex, in the UK - where they print around 75% of the world’s bank notes? Debt (to non-living entities, that you haven’t gone out of your way to create agreemen…
❤86👏14👍5🔥5
Signed Stacey
Video, posted without a caption
❤32💯11👍4🏆2👏2🔥2
Signed Stacey
87-YEAR-OLD WOMAN HASN’T PAID COUNCIL TAX IN 9 YEARS (AND NEVER WILL AGAIN) This lady snapped out of the illusion that we - as humans - must pay non-living entities just to live, and saw the light when her husband died… So what the hell are some of you doing, in continuing to fund corrupt governments and local councils, who syphon and waste the majority of public funds? Anything you’re whining about, is entirely y…
❤34👏34🍾5👍1
Signed Stacey
Photo, posted without a caption
👏10🍾7😁1
Signed Stacey
FIRST TIME DEALING WITH DEBT COLLECTORS (MARSTON) (PS. THEY’RE NOT BAILIFFS!) Yesterday, Ben shared his story of his first time dealing with - and getting rid of - a debt collector, who was trying to solicit cash for unpaid Council Tax. The incident happened the day before (03/11/26) via a ring doorbell (when Ben wasn’t even there), but he absolutely winged (and aced) it. The only thing Ben truly knew, was that h…
❤43🔥16👏11👍4🍾2
Signed Stacey
Photo, posted without a caption
👏25🔥6
Signed Stacey
IN-PERSON EVENTS Wed 18th November BRISTOL 6.30-9.30pm £60pp Mon 23rd November MANCHESTER (10x seats remaining) 6.30-9.30pm £60pp ZOOMS 121s (30 mins £65/1 hour £100 video call, or £100 for 15 mins + group Zoom 5.15pm Wednesday 4th November 11am, 12.15pm, 1.30pm, 2.45pm, 4pm, 5.15pm, 6.30pm Thursday 5th November 8.30am, 9.45am, 11am, 12.15pm Tuesday 10th November 1.30pm, 2.45pm, 4pm, 5.15pm, 6.30pm Wednesday …
❤1
Signed Stacey
SOME THOUGHTS ABOUT GERM THEORY… (And some questions for the mask wearers and hand sanitiser users). I don’t get germs; they’re extremely selective. Wouldn’t the entire user base of #grindr be wiped out, by now? Shouldn’t the same people who are squirting hand sanitiser on their hands, also be doing it on people’s butt cracks and feet? Do germs only live on the inside of a mask, not the outside? Where do said g…
😁37❤30👍13💯12👏2🤩1
Signed Stacey
BAN THE POPPY Go #wetherspoons 👏 The poppy is a symbol of sacrifice, subservience, needless bloodshed and stupidity - young men giving up their lives to fight staged wars that line globalist pockets. What agenda are they trying to push at the moment? Ah…Conscription. By getting outraged about the alleged banning of a poppy causes people to, subconsciously, perpetuate the need for sending men into battle. My own…
❤55💯23👏15👍11😁1
Signed Stacey
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @staceysworldrocks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@staceysworldrocks edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@staceysworldrocks named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stacey's World Rocks” (@staceysworldrocks), 19,639 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/staceysworldrocks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.