Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Stacc's Room

Channel

Stacc's Room

@staccs_room

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

63subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 11 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004427678434
TypeChannel
Username@staccs_room
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 October 2026
Last confirmed live14 October 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/staccs_room

Growth

49635611 October 2026 — 49 subscribers14 October 2026 — 63 subscribers11 October 202614 October 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47–65 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Oct 2026, 00:3163+14
11 Oct 2026, 08:2249first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
74.5%
avg views ÷ 63 subscribers
Avg views / post
46.9
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 October 2026
Posts held20 (10 October 2026 – 11 October 2026)
Views total845
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Oct 2026, 08:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

18 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤844.4%
🔥844.4%
✍211.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2026 to 11 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Oct 2026, 00:45 UTC40 viewsread 11 October 2026

it's quoted in 100xbroker dyor staccdex day tomorrow. for now?! a baby token: CqCnyVWYSUapVhiB2u8kM6kKVYirLegumw84rm4spump and a daddy token: Fr28jEWz2msSCKLaHzus2nCKrwqbpTx2EyDYtsVVpump dyor

10 Oct 2026, 23:33 UTC44 views1 reactionsread 11 October 2026

100x.broker is Hyperliquid on Solana, for every coin, without liquidations. Hyperliquid gives you leverage on the coins they list. 100x.broker gives you ±100× on anything with a Raydium pool, listed by anyone in one tx, and nobody ever gets liquidated because there's no loan: the wrong side's pot pays the right side's pot on every tick. Better than thesis or callout at refs because theirs sell you the call. Ours pa…

❤1

10 Oct 2026, 23:31 UTCviews —

Stacc's Room pinned «100x.broker elevator pitch, for dummies: pick a coin. pick up or down. put in SOL. every time the price moves, the side that’s wrong pays the side that’s right. at 100×. per tick. forever. nobody gets liquidated, ever. there’s no loan, no margin, no funding.…»

10 Oct 2026, 23:31 UTC40 viewsread 11 October 2026

100x.broker elevator pitch, for dummies: pick a coin. pick up or down. put in SOL. every time the price moves, the side that’s wrong pays the side that’s right. at 100×. per tick. forever. nobody gets liquidated, ever. there’s no loan, no margin, no funding. both sides pre-fund a pot and the loser hands over a slice of it on every move. the slice is never the whole pot. you lose by decay, not by a line. the empty sid…

10 Oct 2026, 23:17 UTC36 views1 reactionsread 11 October 2026

hmm fck fiat, 100x long and 100x short anything https://100x.broker/

❤1

10 Oct 2026, 23:02 UTC37 views4 reactionsread 11 October 2026

u r gonna wanna be early on 100x.broker just do it anon, anon trust me, u r gonna wanna be early on 100x.broker

❤4

10 Oct 2026, 22:19 UTC40 viewsread 11 October 2026

the future of france is: gambling with much better payoffs for the degens still among us AND absolutely risk-free money for those risk-averse folks that never once joined us in the memecoin casino (ie real money) so: what I built is 1. 100x/-100x power leverage for any coin on Solana, meme or volatile or stable then what I built is: 2. yield: 99.99% risk-free money* We LP a coin against SOL on its Raydium pool, hedge…

10 Oct 2026, 21:04 UTC36 viewsread 11 October 2026

but wait, there's more! https://x.com/STACCoverflow/status/2109026830736888272

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @staccs_room. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Stacc's Room” (@staccs_room), 63 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/staccs_room.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.