4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,559–7,585 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 02:33
7,562
-13
17 Aug 2026, 17:15
7,575
-6
14 Aug 2026, 11:46
7,581
-1
13 Aug 2026, 22:47
7,582
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 11 August 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 September 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
741 reactions across 10 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
358
48.3%
❤
186
25.1%
🔥
51
6.88%
👏
45
6.07%
🥰
29
3.91%
👎
27
3.64%
😡
16
2.16%
😁
14
1.89%
🤬
5
0.675%
🏆
4
0.54%
😈
3
0.405%
🤯
2
0.27%
💘
1
0.135%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 741reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2023 to 7 September 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤖 Bot Version Update Announcement 🚀
Hello everyone! We're excited to share some new features in our Telegram bot:
1. 🖼️ Custom Image Sizes: Tailor images to your liking with custom dimensions.
2. 🔍 Negative Prompts: Guide image creation by specifying prompts to avoid.
3. ⚙️ Enhanced Settings: Fine-tune Steps, cfg scale, and seed for better control.
For detailed configuration instructions, please chat with the robo…
Model Name: SD XL v1.0 Refiner
Introducing SD XL v1.0 Refiner, an advanced model built upon SDXL to enhance image generation and improve detail handling. With its refined capabilities, this model takes image synthesis to new levels of richness and quality.
Try it:
@img_generate_bot
Model Name: DreamShaper
Introducing DreamShaper, a versatile stable diffusion model designed for AI art and illustrations. With enhanced photorealism, realism, lora support, and NSFW generation in Version 8, DreamShaper empowers artists to create stunning anime-style or lifelike artworks. Experience the freedom and control it offers compared to MidJourney. Join our passionate community and unleash your creativity wi…
Greetings:
We have upgraded the robot @img_generate_bot, and after the upgrade, it now supports concurrent image generation and displays the estimated time for generating images.
Model Name: AnyLoRA
AnyLoRA is a remarkable stable diffusion model for anime, drawings, and cartoons. It offers exceptional training effectiveness, producing impressive results with minimal VRAM usage. Adjust weight and offset parameters for fine-tuning. Compatible with new models, it ensures seamless integration for future LoRA training. Elevate your artistry and unlock unparalleled creativity with AnyLoRA!
T…
Welcome to our Telegram channel! Explore AI-generated images with us. Join for exciting discussions(https://t.me/image_generate) and try our AI Image Generation Bot @img_generate_bot.
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @stablediffusionapi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Do you think you don't need so many models? Just provide a few high-quality models (the important thing is image quality)
few high-quality models66%
many models16%
Don't care models, only care image quality.18%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2023 to 7 September 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Genie AI: #1 ChatGPT Telegram Bot @genie_news · 77,465 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 19 August 2026
Neural Pony @neuralpony · 199,336 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AI Image Generation” (@stablediffusionapi), 7,562 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stablediffusionapi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.