Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝗦p͟͟r͟͟i͟͟ng𝘵𝘳ap.

@ssn_springtr4p

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003995011263
TypeChannel
Username@ssn_springtr4p
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 26 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ssn_springtr4p

Growth

1110 August 2026 — 11 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11 subscribers10 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10–12 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 08:1611no change
10 Aug 2026, 17:4511first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
265.5%
avg views ÷ 11 subscribers
Avg views / post
29.2
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (26 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total584
Reactions total51
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Videos
1
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
56s
Average length
56s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

51 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52425545832129096791121.6%
custom 5388752761707845907917.6%
custom 5366064343563647508815.7%
custom 5208783972624009845713.7%
custom 535759244755784898659.80%
custom 536636969426355777359.80%
custom 524252792005593864347.84%
custom 525161597207003044411.96%
👀11.96%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC15 viewsread 12 August 2026

🖤✨🥹🔤грожать только и можешь, верно? не удивлен. Это единственное, на что ты действительно способен.

6 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC15 viewsread 12 August 2026

🖤✨🥹🔤еня сюда не ввязывайте. 🤩

30 Jul 2026, 20:29 UTC28 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🖤✨🥹🤩 вроде жив, а вроде мертв. я чувствую, как личинки копошатся в моем гнилом теле (вернее костюме), как они прогрызают дырки и сжирают остатки еле-как живых мышц. это невыносимо. 🤩 я давно не чувствую уже так таковой боли, но даже так я это слышу. Да что там, я вижу их. Да, я хотел бессмертия, но не такого. Да, это было мотивацией моих действий, но кто мог подумать, что это обернется таким образом?

custom 53575924475578489862custom 52425545832129096791custom 53660643435636475081custom 53663696942635577731

30 Jul 2026, 18:57 UTC27 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🖤✨🥹🤩 как тут заблокировать человека, напомните пожалуйста.. если вообще так можно-..

custom 52087839726240098452custom 52425545832129096792custom 53660643435636475082custom 52425279200559386431

30 Jul 2026, 18:55 UTC29 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🖤✨🥹🔤ожно поковыряться в твоей гнойной копилке🥹🤩 🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚 .. ???!! что это вообще должно, блять, значить. #anon . кв маты ээ хз

👀1custom 52087839726240098451custom 52425545832129096791custom 53663696942635577731

30 Jul 2026, 18:53 UTC25 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🖤✨🥹🔤рости я конечно хотел тебя сжечь но мама сказала что мусор сжигать нельзя🥹🤩 🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚 .. ? ? ? да лучше уж сожгли бы, честно. #anon .

custom 52425279200559386431custom 53575924475578489861custom 53887527617078459071

30 Jul 2026, 16:44 UTC24 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🖤✨🥹🔤рпр чё как трупишься?🥹🤩 🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚 .. ещё тупее вопроса были не в силах придумать? А как вы думаете? Какого ходить запертым в гнилом, старом костюме, еле как перебирая ногами и фактически изолированным, способным на связь только лишь через это устройство, с учетом того, что вам даже печатать сложно? а я вот знаю какого это. переживаю это снова и снова. Плохо труплюсь я. Уж лучше было бы просто у

custom 52425545832129096792custom 52087839726240098451custom 53887527617078459071

27 Jul 2026, 22:37 UTC30 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🖤✨🥹🤩есцельное скитание здесь мне наскучивает слишком быстро. Да даже двигаться банально тяжело. 🤩 поэтому, возможно, все же капелька общения мне не повредит. Чтобы развеяться. И, возможно, не сойти с ума и потерять хоть какой-то оставшийся рассудок.

custom 52425545832129096792custom 53660643435636475082custom 53887527617078459071

27 Jul 2026, 14:39 UTC34 viewsread 12 August 2026

🖤✨🥹🤩осле "разговора" паршиво хотя мне всегда паршиво, особенно физически стало. фу.

27 Jul 2026, 14:31 UTC35 viewsread 12 August 2026

🖤✨🥹🤩ато одно общее у нас точно есть : неприязнь к друг другу скорее ненависить, конечно.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ssn_springtr4p. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 770,472 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗦p͟͟r͟͟i͟͟ng𝘵𝘳ap.” (@ssn_springtr4p), 11 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ssn_springtr4p.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.