Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for дочь самурая

Channel

дочь самурая

@sshadsamura

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,061subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002136764377
TypeChannel
Username@sshadsamura
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sshadsamura

Growth

2,0582,0682,0637 August 2026 — 2,068 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,067 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,062 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,058 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,061 subscribers2,0617 August 202618 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 11 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,057–2,070 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 03:522,061+3
14 Aug 2026, 22:452,058-4
11 Aug 2026, 18:282,062-5
8 Aug 2026, 11:312,067-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:172,068first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.5%
avg views ÷ 2,061 subscribers
Avg views / post
671
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
20.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held13 (28 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total8,718
Reactions total1,818
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,818 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 524006598896730695150427.7%
custom 523997087262156799743123.7%
custom 546073128110290437635219.4%
custom 545418236650956752531217.2%
custom 524020146941569038921912.0%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,818reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 13 we hold a reading for · 62%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sshadsamura. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC288 views111 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🌟:: у одной меня это лето самое быстрое в жизни? я вообще ещё думаю, что за окном только май начался. ничего не понимаю. какой август? какая осень? я не хочу... 😡

custom 546073128110290437666custom 524020146941569038925custom 545418236650956752517custom 52400659889673069513

6 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC510 views127 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 524006598896730695172custom 546073128110290437632custom 524020146941569038920custom 54541823665095675253

5 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC478 views94 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 524006598896730695149custom 524020146941569038923custom 545418236650956752514custom 52399708726215679975custom 54607312811029043763

5 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC533 views136 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

. если на мои вбросы про смерть всегда будет такой отклик, я начну думать, что тебе это нравится. аккуратно с байтами на такие темы. это мое любимое 🤦

custom 524006598896730695177custom 523997087262156799729custom 545418236650956752523custom 54607312811029043767

4 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC592 views158 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 524006598896730695187custom 524020146941569038930custom 546073128110290437627custom 52399708726215679978custom 54541823665095675256

4 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC620 views81 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 524020146941569038938custom 524006598896730695121custom 545418236650956752515custom 52399708726215679977

4 Aug 2026, 05:20 UTC616 views152 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌟когда я говорю об аутентичных и вайбовых изданиях, я говорю про старые книги рю.

custom 524006598896730695185custom 523997087262156799732custom 545418236650956752528custom 54607312811029043767

1 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC854 views232 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

🌟 ❤️ успеть до смерти: 🌟написать книгу 🌟посетить скандинавию/японию. и пожить там 🌟полюбить. искренне и всецело. безвозмездно 🌟прочитать все свои книги 🌟какое-то время вообще не работать 🌟не жалеть об утраченном времени 🌟пожить без голосов в голове 🌟найти покой. в смерти или вне её

custom 5460731281102904376133custom 545418236650956752550custom 523997087262156799735custom 524006598896730695110custom 52402014694156903894

1 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC784 views79 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 545418236650956752541custom 524020146941569038922custom 523997087262156799712custom 54607312811029043763custom 52400659889673069511

30 Jul 2026, 09:46 UTC954 views145 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 524006598896730695176custom 523997087262156799730custom 545418236650956752527custom 546073128110290437610custom 52402014694156903892

30 Jul 2026, 05:38 UTC852 views135 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟я боялась в нечитун брать любимого оэ. это могло сыграть злую шутку со мной. в такой период легко можно словить отвращение к истории/автору, а я слишком дорожу своей любовью к кэндзабуро, как ты знаешь... 🤍🌿🌿 ... но я и предположить не могла, что его текст как в сухую землю впитается в меня. не заметила как 50стр вмиг улетели. в центре сюжета, как обычно, у оэ война и дети, которые страдаю

custom 523997087262156799771custom 545418236650956752529custom 524006598896730695123custom 52402014694156903896custom 54607312811029043766

28 Jul 2026, 17:23 UTC833 views191 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

🌟🌟 я: *выкладывает вайбовые карточки, где мелькают новые книги* ты: кружки с книгами, кружкииии, к.н.и.г.и, распаковка, го, таваааай, давно не было ❤️накидывай реакций на последние посты и самурай всё устроит 😁

custom 5239970872621567997101custom 524020146941569038944custom 545418236650956752528custom 546073128110290437618

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @sshadsamura. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 477,020 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“дочь самурая” (@sshadsamura), 2,061 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sshadsamura.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.