Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SSC Tides

Channel

SSC Tides

@ssctides

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,620subscribers

+251 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003509108356
TypeChannel
Username@ssctides
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded21 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ssctides

Growth

2,3692,6202,494.521 August 2026 — 2,369 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2,369 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,425 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,570 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,620 subscribers21 August 202628 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 8 days, net +251. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,331–2,658 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 19:332,620+50
25 Aug 2026, 15:432,570+145
22 Aug 2026, 05:562,425+56
21 Aug 2026, 07:002,369no change
21 Aug 2026, 06:452,369first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
58.4%
avg views ÷ 2,620 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,530
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held20 (20 August 202621 August 2026)
Views total30,612
Reactions total374
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken21 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

374 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
17647.1%
👍7620.3%
😨349.09%
🔥246.42%
😁154.01%
😱154.01%
🥰92.41%
🤷‍♂71.87%
🥴71.87%
🤗41.07%
👏30.802%
🎉20.535%
🤣20.535%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 374reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 05:54 UTC823 views44 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Aaj 40 out of 50 , 80 out of 100 asa pass hori 😮

😨30🥰7😁3🎉2👍2

21 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC873 views3 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Share review of day 3 agar apka physical ho gya ho @ssctides_bot

3

21 Aug 2026, 05:27 UTC906 views14 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Review of height Mere pichli bar Delhi police me 159 Utari Ab ke 157.6 Bhut antar ara bhai Ptani hight me etna anter kise krhe hai

11😁3

21 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC≈1,010 views15 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Khud dekh lo m koi demotivate nhi kar raha ha 1.5 cm less height measure ho rahi ha Even kisi kisi ladki ki 2 cm bhi kam aai ha

👍11😁4

21 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC≈1,120 views33 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Ab Delhi Police Superfast Mode m aa gyi ha 6.30 bheja running start hogi first batch ki 10 bheja 6 batch ka complete process khatam ho gya ha dv tak 10.30 tak last running hogi and Kisi kisi ground par 11 last hogi bas Ladko ka running or jaldi hogi because 6 min ki hoti ha tho 10 - 10.30 last all batch

🔥208👍5

20 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC≈1,430 views54 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Dear Members Agar Mena Apko Bot Diya Ha Ki Koi Serious Issue Ha Tho Puch Lo So Please It's My Humble Request Serious Chej Hi Pucha Karo Pura Din Unwanted Messages Aata Ha Ladko Ka Physical Hua Nhi Ha But Cut Off Ka Puch Na Ha Hoga Ki Nhi. Asi Ladkiya Ha Group M Sorry To Say I Am Sad Un Sab Ka Liye Jinka Nhi Hua Physical Clear But Physical Sa Pehla 10 - 20 Baar Cut Off Puchi Hogi Ki Nhi Ab Kya Fayada Puchna Ka I H

41😁5🤗4🤣2🥰2

20 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC≈1,520 views20 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Delhi Police Constable Physical Update 20 August Day 2 Total - 6000 Present - 4153 Final Qualified - 2627 Total Passing Out Percent - 43% @ssctides @ssctides_Bot

17🔥3

20 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC≈1,590 views5 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Share review of today's physical @ssctides_bot

4🔥1

20 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC≈1,620 views12 reactionsread 21 August 2026

agar apka physical ho gya ha and caste obc, sc, ews thi tho ek baar caste certificate ka bata do konsa accept kiya ha Central ya state and crucial date bhi confirm kar do @ssctides_bot

12

20 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC≈1,620 views0 reactionsread 21 August 2026

obc certificate crucial date ka baad ka accept hua ha aaj dv m but central ka

20 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC≈1,630 views4 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Agar apka aadhar m Photo updated nhi ha childish ha tho kuch nhi bol raha ha so tension free raho

👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ssctides. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 471,633 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SSC Tides” (@ssctides), 2,620 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ssctides.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.