Channel
@srpd05
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
316subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004395028854 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @srpd05 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 16 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/srpd05 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:14 | 316 | +4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 312 | no change |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 312 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 16 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (16 August 2026 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,909 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 31 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【所属群组】【珠海/中山】学生会 【所在地区】 #珠海香洲 【老师艺名】 水娃夏晚 【联系方式】 @fjsr05 【验证留名】 626 【验证日期】 2026年8月30日 【上课价位】 1500pp 【人照几分】 9.9 【服务过程】苦等良久老师终于红休结束了。果断立马迅速约上。一开门，确认过眼神，遇上意中人。整个过程配合默契，前戏铺垫充分，正赛节奏把控得当，攻防转换流畅。过程中注重情感交流，双方满意度高。体力分配合理，事后放松安抚到位，综合评级：夯。下次计划加强自身体能训练，再接再厉，在创巅峰。 tip: 老师课表中有的都有。心动的兄弟可以果断出击了。 【打分标准】10 ⚠️报告提交给学生会委员处 @dg98bot 并须附：确认可添加的联系方式聊天等截图，遥控上楼部分聊天截图、付款截图（如现金，请说明)交流群： …
Video, posted without a caption
不是本人，假一赔十哈哈哈哈
Video, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
微小的快乐，也值得郑重收藏🥰
开心🥳过好每一天。
Photo, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Channel name was changed to «水娃💦夏晚»
@#报告模板 【所属群组】【珠海/中山】学生会 【所在地区】 珠海 【老师艺名】 夏晚 【联系方式】 飞机 【验证留名】 灵龙 【验证日期】 2026年 8月 17日 【上课价位】 1500 【人照几分】 10分 【服务过程】 第一次写小作文，说实话我是一个很懒的人，所以不是让我非常认可的情况下我是不会去写这么多字的。首先各位狼友这个绝对不是中介，我也是真的给中介坑怕了，其次这个小姐姐真的真的太漂亮了，她进门的那一刻我居然害羞了，有点紧张，夏晚很会聊天，很热情，一下子就把话题打开了，这么久以来第一次让我有在恋爱的感觉。之后我在洗澡，夏晚直接冲进来蹲下很温柔的把二弟含在了嘴里，那绝品的身材，天使的面容蹲在前面，全身的水珠差点没让我交代在淋浴间。出来后直接步入主题，夏晚真的是超级敏感的体质，让人欲罢不能，最后高潮前她居然一把含住我的手指猛吸，那视觉刺激的直接让我交代了，这还不算什么，关键是夏晚居然喷水了，身体一直在抽搐，我都以为我…
【所属群组】【珠海/中山】学生会 【所在地区】 #珠海香洲 【老师艺名】 水娃夏晚 【联系方式】 @fjsr05 【验证留名】 木木 【验证日期】 2026年8月16日 【上课价位】 1500pp 【人照几分】 9.9 【服务过程】宝贝夏晚刚上榜就关注了，可惜昨天没有约上老师让我伤心一晚上，第二天一大早就提前预约好头课，中间一波小插曲添加了一点点色彩让我更期待见到夏晚宝贝，驱车前往科室位置很好找，停车位也多特别方便这点做的很好，直接一上楼门一开映入眼帘的是一个特别好看穿着制服的性感美女，精致的面容，一对勾人的眼镜让我目不转睛的一直盯着老师看 二弟情不自禁的举来起来，哈哈哈 一进门夏晚就在笑，，很融洽的氛围。交完水费邀约一起洗澡，看着慢慢褪去的衣物，露出洁白的身体，忍不住上手抚摸老师的小白兔以及pp。洗澡过程中看着二弟在老师手中直起，忍不住蹭了几下 然后简单洗漱过后，老师自己就来了个水中潇如果不是本人害羞夏晚会一直口 不催很温柔很…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @srpd05. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“水娃💦夏晚” (@srpd05), 316 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/srpd05.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.