Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Национальная ассоциация корпоративных директоров

@sronacd

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

726subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001159447723
TypeChannel
Username@sronacd
DescriptionКорпоративное управление в России. Канал для владельцев бизнеса, директоров, топ-менеджеров и всех, кто стремится ими стать. Для сотрудничества и обратной связи: @N_i_k_o_l_a_y_S
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/sronacd

Growth

7267 Aug 2026, 02:07 — 726 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:16 — 726 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:077 Aug 2026, 02:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 725–727 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 02:16726no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:07726first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.2%
avg views ÷ 726 subscribers
Avg views / post
241
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held13 (22 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,929
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 02:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
187
Videos
29
Links
744

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1664.0%
🔥312.0%
28.00%
👌28.00%
😁14.00%
🙏14.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC109 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

О возможности использования ЗПИФ в девелопменте. Обострение конкуренции на рынке недвижимости обнажает выбор правильного способа финансирования проектов. Член НАКД Дмитрий Качановский об эффективности ЗПИФ в своей статье на РБК https://companies.rbc.ru/news/j7CYIPnMlO/o-vozmozhnosti-ispolzovaniya-zpif-v-developmente/

👌1

4 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC103 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @shtab_mos_ruPhoto

✍+👮‍♂️ Уведомление о начале предпринимательской деятельности и обязательный профилактический визит: что важно знать бизнесу ⚠ Открыли кафе или магазин и не уведомили об этом уполномоченный орган - это ошибка, которая несет риски для предпринимателя! ❗Важно: строго до начала выполнения работ или оказания услуг необходимо подать уведомление о начале осуществления предпринимательской деятельности. 📌 На кого распростр

2👌1

Signed N S

31 Jul 2026, 10:33 UTC235 viewsread 7 August 2026

Директор, который устал от адреналиновых советов «покупать всё, пока валится»!! Да-да, ты, кто готовит «инвестиционный парашют», а все время съедает операционка!! Этот эфир — твой «интеллектуальный курорт»: неспешные инвестиции, трезвый анализ и уважение к твоему времени. Забронируй себе час на этот эфир и отнесись к нему как к управленческому совету директоров по твоим личным и корпоративным деньгам - без лишнего

Signed N S

27 Jul 2026, 05:31 UTC293 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Правление Саморегулируемой организации «Национальная ассоциация корпоративных директоров» рассмотрело инициативу и экспертные заключения на проект изменений в сфере корпоративного управления, опубликованный в рамках крауд-платформы Агентства стратегических инициатив. Профессиональное сообщество поддержало интеграцию с азиатскими стандартами, но выступило против изменения системы учета независимых директоров https://c

👍3

23 Jul 2026, 11:38 UTC314 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вероника Татаренкова приняла участие в XX Международном форуме НОКС. Член Правления НАКД Вероника Татаренкова о том, в чем заключается «мастерство баланса», как это связано с необходимостью содержательной трансформации управления. https://companies.rbc.ru/news/UkTt8Mojuy/veronika-tatarenkova-prinyala-uchastie-v-xx-mezhdunarodnom-forume-noks/

👍2

15 Jul 2026, 07:06 UTC351 viewsread 7 August 2026

Канал НАКД в мессенджере Макс стал публичным. Теперь он доступен для широкой публики и индексируется поисковыми системами. Присоединяйся к каналу по ссылке и приглашайте коллег, друзей и партнёров: max.ru/channel_sronakd

8 Jul 2026, 15:24 UTC448 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Титанические изменения в корпоративном управлении! В законы об АО и ООО внесены изменения позволяющие прекращать полномочия члена совета директоров по письменному заявлению. Напомним, что ранее такой процедуры предусмотрено не было прекращение полномочий члена совета директоров происходило либо в случае его смерти, либо в случае переизбрания собранием акционеров. Вторая интересная новелла: "доизбрание" выбывшего чле

👍3

Signed N S

3 Jul 2026, 09:25 UTC437 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Китайский подход к корпоративному управлению: что мы не видим. Член НАКД Георгий Солдатов в своей статье на РБК рассказывает о том, зачем знания о китайской системе управления нам в России https://companies.rbc.ru/news/WJftj8mSul/kitajskij-podhod-k-korporativnomu-upravleniyu-chto-myi-ne-vidim/

👍5🔥1😁1

2 Jul 2026, 12:19 UTC383 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Уважаемые коллеги! Начался новый корпоративный год и можно начинать взаимодействовать с обществами, куда Вы избраны. Имеющаяся у нас информация об избраниях на весенних комиссиях (общества с долей РФ 100 %). Выложена в нашем чате.

Signed N S

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @sronacd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Национальная ассоциация корпоративных директоров” (@sronacd), 726 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sronacd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.