Channel
@sronacd
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
722subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001159447723 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sronacd |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sronacd |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 722 | +4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 718 | +1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 08:55 | 717 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 720 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 723 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 726 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 726 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
25 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 16 | 64.0% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 12.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 8.00% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 8.00% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 4.00% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 4.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
О возможности использования ЗПИФ в девелопменте. Обострение конкуренции на рынке недвижимости обнажает выбор правильного способа финансирования проектов. Член НАКД Дмитрий Качановский об эффективности ЗПИФ в своей статье на РБК https://companies.rbc.ru/news/j7CYIPnMlO/o-vozmozhnosti-ispolzovaniya-zpif-v-developmente/
👌1
✍+👮♂️ Уведомление о начале предпринимательской деятельности и обязательный профилактический визит: что важно знать бизнесу ⚠ Открыли кафе или магазин и не уведомили об этом уполномоченный орган - это ошибка, которая несет риски для предпринимателя! ❗Важно: строго до начала выполнения работ или оказания услуг необходимо подать уведомление о начале осуществления предпринимательской деятельности. 📌 На кого распростр…
❤2👌1
Signed N S
Директор, который устал от адреналиновых советов «покупать всё, пока валится»!! Да-да, ты, кто готовит «инвестиционный парашют», а все время съедает операционка!! Этот эфир — твой «интеллектуальный курорт»: неспешные инвестиции, трезвый анализ и уважение к твоему времени. Забронируй себе час на этот эфир и отнесись к нему как к управленческому совету директоров по твоим личным и корпоративным деньгам - без лишнего…
Signed N S
https://vkvideo.ru/video-233662091_456239047
Signed N S
Правление Саморегулируемой организации «Национальная ассоциация корпоративных директоров» рассмотрело инициативу и экспертные заключения на проект изменений в сфере корпоративного управления, опубликованный в рамках крауд-платформы Агентства стратегических инициатив. Профессиональное сообщество поддержало интеграцию с азиатскими стандартами, но выступило против изменения системы учета независимых директоров https://c…
👍3
Вероника Татаренкова приняла участие в XX Международном форуме НОКС. Член Правления НАКД Вероника Татаренкова о том, в чем заключается «мастерство баланса», как это связано с необходимостью содержательной трансформации управления. https://companies.rbc.ru/news/UkTt8Mojuy/veronika-tatarenkova-prinyala-uchastie-v-xx-mezhdunarodnom-forume-noks/
👍2
Posted without readable text
Signed N S
Канал НАКД в мессенджере Макс стал публичным. Теперь он доступен для широкой публики и индексируется поисковыми системами. Присоединяйся к каналу по ссылке и приглашайте коллег, друзей и партнёров: max.ru/channel_sronakd
File, posted without a caption
Signed N S
Титанические изменения в корпоративном управлении! В законы об АО и ООО внесены изменения позволяющие прекращать полномочия члена совета директоров по письменному заявлению. Напомним, что ранее такой процедуры предусмотрено не было прекращение полномочий члена совета директоров происходило либо в случае его смерти, либо в случае переизбрания собранием акционеров. Вторая интересная новелла: "доизбрание" выбывшего чле…
👍3
Signed N S
Китайский подход к корпоративному управлению: что мы не видим. Член НАКД Георгий Солдатов в своей статье на РБК рассказывает о том, зачем знания о китайской системе управления нам в России https://companies.rbc.ru/news/WJftj8mSul/kitajskij-podhod-k-korporativnomu-upravleniyu-chto-myi-ne-vidim/
👍5🔥1😁1
Уважаемые коллеги! Начался новый корпоративный год и можно начинать взаимодействовать с обществами, куда Вы избраны. Имеющаяся у нас информация об избраниях на весенних комиссиях (общества с долей РФ 100 %). Выложена в нашем чате.
Signed N S
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @sronacd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Национальная ассоциация корпоративных директоров” (@sronacd), 722 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sronacd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.