Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

СправПортал - Финансовая безопасность и защита от спама и мошенников

@spravportal_whocalls

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

191,255subscribers

-156 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001622478243
TypeChannel
Username@spravportal_whocalls
DescriptionВедущий канал о финансовой безопасности и защите от телефонных мошенников от сервиса СправПортал https://www.spravportal.ru/Services/PhoneCodes/MobilePhoneInfo.aspx РКН: https://www.spravportal.ru/l/tgrkn Реклама: @Spiral_Yuri Сотрудничество: @p_pozvon
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/spravportal_whocalls

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 36% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

191,255191,411191,3337 August 2026 — 191,411 subscribers7 August 2026 — 191,306 subscribers8 August 2026 — 191,315 subscribers9 August 2026 — 191,274 subscribers10 August 2026 — 191,284 subscribers11 August 2026 — 191,316 subscribers12 August 2026 — 191,255 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -156. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 191,232–191,434 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:58191,255-61
11 Aug 2026, 19:13191,316+32
10 Aug 2026, 16:41191,284+10
9 Aug 2026, 18:16191,274-41
8 Aug 2026, 17:38191,315+9
7 Aug 2026, 20:46191,306-105
7 Aug 2026, 14:03191,411first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.47%
avg views ÷ 191,255 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,540
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.444%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held29 (22 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total247,683
Reactions total1,099
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
260
Videos
15
Links
407

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,099 reactions across 28 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23221.1%
🤝21919.9%
👍21019.1%
👏11210.2%
😱706.37%
😁555.00%
custom 5210908624225850973514.64%
🔥433.91%
🤔413.73%
🤯272.46%
😢191.73%
custom 5282948299660207805100.91%
🙏40.364%
💯30.273%
🐳20.182%
🎉10.091%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,099reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 29 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @spravportal_whocalls. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC≈3,200 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🗣Фишинг под видом запароленных архивов Мошенники стали чаще рассылать письма с вредоносными вложениями, замаскированными под запароленные RAR-архивы. По данным "Почты Mail", такие архивы использовались в 13% заблокированных писем с вредоносными вложениями. Особенно активно такие рассылки фиксировались в период сдачи налоговой и квартальной отчетности - злоумышленники рассчитывают, что получатель примет вложение за

🤝134💯1

12 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC≈4,730 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

8😁6custom 52829482996602078051

11 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC≈5,010 views45 reactionsread 12 August 2026

❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ Мошенники под видом полицейских ходят по квартирам Мошенники начали представляться сотрудниками полиции и приходить к гражданам домой под предлогом подготовки к переписи населения, проверки документов, опроса соседей или борьбы с мошенничеством. Используя форму и поддельные удостоверения, злоумышленники пытаются попасть в квартиру, получить паспортные данные и биометрию. Настоящие сотрудники полиции не з

🤝32👍94

11 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC≈4,780 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

😁8👏3custom 52829482996602078053

11 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC≈5,680 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🗣Банки предотвратили хищение почти 1,9 трлн рублей Во втором квартале 2026 года российские банки предотвратили 17,5 млн попыток мошенников похитить деньги клиентов на общую сумму почти 1,9 трлн рублей. По сравнению с первым кварталом количество и объем предотвращенных операций выросли более чем на 4%. При этом злоумышленникам удалось провести 458,7 тыс. мошеннических операций - на 7,5% меньше, чем кварталом ранее.

🔥16👏8😁84🤔2

11 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC≈5,910 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

11😁3custom 52829482996602078053🐳1

10 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC≈6,290 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ Поддельные сайты ЦБ для оформления кредитов Мошенники создают сайты, внешне похожие на официальные ресурсы Банка России, и убеждают человека, что на его имя якобы уже оформлены мошеннические кредиты. Чтобы "аннулировать" эти кредиты и защитить деньги, жертве предлагают самостоятельно оформить новые займы в разных банках. Полученные средства в итоге переводятся мошенникам. 🛡🛡🛡🛡🛡🛡 🛡 Помните: Банк России н

👍16🤝7custom 521090862422585097321💯1🙏1

10 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC≈5,530 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ Мошенники крадут данные родителей через "проверку" карт детей Мошенники рассылают родителям сообщения о якобы подозрительных операциях по банковским картам их детей-подростков. ❓❓❓❓❓ Для проверки предлагают перейти по ссылке на поддельный сервис, который обещает показать выписки по счету ребенка. Под предлогом подтверждения родства у родителей требуют загрузить копии паспортов и свидетельств о рождении,

😱87🤝3custom 52109086242258509732💯1

8 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC≈8,340 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🗣Возврат денег за услуги риелторов при обмане МВД, ФСБ и Генпрокуратура предложили создать механизм возврата денег за услуги риелторов, если суд признает сделку с недвижимостью недействительной. Инициатива связана с тем, что после усиления банковских антифрод-процедур мошенники стали чаще использовать схемы с отчуждением жилья. Окончательное решение пока не принято. Генпрокуратура намерена дождаться позиции Росреес

👍286custom 52829482996602078053🔥2custom 52109086242258509731

8 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC≈8,540 views56 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

🗣Хищения через банкоматы выросли в 76 раз В России зафиксировали резкий рост мошенничества с использованием банкоматов. По данным ЦБ, во II квартале 2026 года злоумышленники провели около 1 700 операций без согласия клиентов и похитили более 252 млн рублей. Статистика учитывает только незаконное внесение наличных и переводы через банкоматы. Всего же за первое полугодие мошенники украли с банковских карт россиян свы

😢18🤔13🤯7😁74😱3👏2👍1

7 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC≈9,130 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026

❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ Мошенники переносят домовые чаты в другой мессенджер Аферисты сообщают россиянам, что Telegram якобы плохо работает, поэтому домовой чат по их адресу переносится в другой мессенджер. Жертве предлагают подтвердить добавление в новый чат. После этого мошенники под различными предлогами выманивают персональные данные и код из СМС, чтобы получить доступ к аккаунтам человека. 🛡🛡🛡🛡🛡🛡 🛡 Не подтверждайте вступ

14🤝10🤔5😱4🔥1custom 52109086242258509731

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @spravportal_whocalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 832,640 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СправПортал - Финансовая безопасность и защита от спама и мошенников” (@spravportal_whocalls), 191,255 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spravportal_whocalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.