Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Mango

@sportmafi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,098subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001871606563
TypeChannel
Username@sportmafi
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sportmafi

Growth

1,0961,0981,0977 August 2026 — 1,097 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,097 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,096 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,098 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,096–1,098 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:381,098+2
10 Aug 2026, 00:531,096-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:021,097no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:481,097first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
90.7%
avg views ÷ 1,098 subscribers
Avg views / post
996
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (29 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total7,970
Reactions total222
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

393 reactions across 19 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15739.9%
👍5213.2%
🔥4912.5%
❤‍🔥4110.4%
😁215.34%
133.31%
🤗133.31%
😍123.05%
🤪92.29%
🤔82.04%
😢61.53%
💯51.27%
🤣41.02%
🤯20.509%
👻10.254%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 393reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC658 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Прочитал отличный пост г-на Yes’a о том, почему ручное вмешательство в рассадку ради урегулирования личных конфликтов игроков -> это путь в никуда. ​Хочу добавить несколько мыслей от себя и публично поддержать эту позицию. ​Мы не просто так называем нашу дисциплину спортивной мафией. В любом классическом спорте -> выходишь ты на корт или на поле и у тебя нет опции подойти к главному судье и сказать: «Знаете, мне не

14💯5🔥2👍1🤔1🤯1

5 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC689 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Сын вдохновил на такую вот песенку :)

12🔥2❤‍🔥1👻1😍1

29 Jul 2026, 12:08 UTC≈1,150 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня ученица поблагодарила меня за то, что я дал ей посмотреть этот нереально крутой фильм, о котором мало кто знает. И так совпало, что я сейчас отправил его посмотреть ещё одному своему ученику. Фильм нереально глубокий. Сюжет начинается как типичная драма: пара переживает серьезный кризис в браке. Их семейный психотерапевт предлагает нестандартный шаг -> отправиться на выходные в красивый уединенный загородн

14🔥6🤔1

27 Jul 2026, 09:13 UTC≈1,130 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мне в лс написали посмотреть феномен г-жи Dominika Вот тут ссылка на вчерашние игры - https://www.youtube.com/live/o5lU4hQIwTs?si=sIUWj5ok7tDk9AYG После просмотра всех игр = уверен, что она супер отличный эмпат! За контрастными столами в 3-ку чёрных в нулевой круг играет! Умница! Верю, что у неё большое будущее в мафии! Осталось чёрную карту подтянуть. Проблема всех тех, кто там доставал чёрную карту, когда Домини

👍6🔥433😁2

26 Jul 2026, 08:12 UTC941 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ученик пришёл утром на треньку. Говорит «Алекс, ты люююбишь АВОКАДО??» Я говорю «да, конечно» Он «наааааа» Очень прикольный подарок на день рождения! :)

28😍11👍5🤔1

23 Jul 2026, 13:25 UTC≈1,060 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня переписывался с ученицей, затронули тему памяти, она сказала, что раньше намного хуже запоминала речи игроков. Я подтвердил, у меня тоже самое от мафии память сильно прокачалась. Моё мнение, что мафия -> это не только хобби, но и отличный тренажер для мозга. Умение держать в голове ходы и речи всех 10-ых игроков -> это не просто. + коммуникабельность, которой у большинства людей просто нет. Обожаю мафию!

31👍13🤗3

18 Jul 2026, 09:43 UTC≈1,350 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ошибка Шерифа при 9-х! Почему нельзя прятаться при 9-ых, если за столом 2 новичка. Только что посмотрел 1-ую открывающую игру Krakow Supreme (стол 2), где Шерифом был Кузя, и это идеальный пример для разбора одной из самых фатальных ошибок в спортивной мафии. Ситуация: Круг при 9-х. Кузя решает спрятаться и просто обозначает себя как «мирной проверкой». Захотел пожить подольше :))) Но есть одно огромное «НО» - за

105🤔2

17 Jul 2026, 09:38 UTC992 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вчера на стриме у Куклы услышал фразу. Звучала она примерно так: «Раньше я прям горела новой серией, а сейчас это ушло. Бывают, конечно, достаточно интересные игры, но само чувство пропало». Это чувство уходит тогда, когда мы «наедаемся». Значит, главная задача -> не надеяться на голод, а именно снова стать голодным. А это очень непросто, когда у тебя вокруг постоянный «шведский стол» и «всё включено». Как вернуть

👍219🔥3

11 Jul 2026, 16:20 UTC≈1,130 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Очередной баг чёрного игрока.

🔥131🤯1😁1

11 Jul 2026, 08:58 UTC≈1,060 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сделал мемную заставочку для финала июня, кто понял, тот понял :) https://www.twitch.tv/swipeal

🔥54😁4

10 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTC≈1,060 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня в личке обсуждал с участницей закрытых разборов наболевшую тему: ручной поиск маркеров. Обычно, чтобы разобрать одного игрока (как он просыпается, как строит аргументы, к кому обращается), уходит минимум 60 минут. И самое обидное - что после инвестиции этого часа, можно обнаружить, что игрок абсолютно «неконтрастный», и маркеров просто нет. Вчера я завершил масштабную ИИ-подготовку к завтрашнему финалу. Комп

5🔥3

9 Jul 2026, 17:40 UTC821 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Целый день на работе был, соскучился по своей семье. Не забывайте и вы о самом важном.

❤‍🔥32🤗108

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sportmafi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 953,622 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mango” (@sportmafi), 1,098 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sportmafi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.