Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Спорта

Channel

Спорта

@sportasmi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

52,858subscribers

+6,787 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003515450628
TypeChannel
Username@sportasmi
DescriptionПодача решает! РКН № 7706826658
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sportasmi

Growth

46,07152,85849,464.55 August 2026 — 46,071 subscribers6 August 2026 — 46,071 subscribers6 August 2026 — 47,038 subscribers7 August 2026 — 48,171 subscribers8 August 2026 — 49,115 subscribers9 August 2026 — 49,916 subscribers10 August 2026 — 50,658 subscribers11 August 2026 — 51,153 subscribers12 August 2026 — 51,589 subscribers13 August 2026 — 52,088 subscribers14 August 2026 — 52,858 subscribers5 August 202614 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 9 days, net +6,787. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45,053–53,876 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 23:3952,858+770
13 Aug 2026, 17:1552,088+499
12 Aug 2026, 18:1751,589+436
11 Aug 2026, 18:3251,153+495
10 Aug 2026, 17:2450,658+742
9 Aug 2026, 18:1849,916+801
8 Aug 2026, 20:2249,115+944
7 Aug 2026, 18:1848,171+1,133
6 Aug 2026, 19:0147,038+967
6 Aug 2026, 01:4746,071no change
5 Aug 2026, 21:2946,071first reading

Engagement

151 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.67%
avg views ÷ 52,858 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,410
151 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.507%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
151
of 151 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 134 of 151 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held151 (4 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total213,350
Reactions total983
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 02:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,940
Videos
278
Links
2,060

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
28m 39s
Average length
1m 47s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

809 reactions across 116 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22127.3%
🔥17621.8%
👍13116.2%
678.28%
👏334.08%
👎273.34%
💘222.72%
😁161.98%
🏆141.73%
❤‍🔥121.48%
🤣121.48%
🖕111.36%
🥰91.11%
😍80.989%
😢80.989%
🤡60.742%
👻40.494%
💋30.371%
💔30.371%
🤔30.371%
13 further kinds232.84%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 134 of the 151 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 983reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 151 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 23:27 UTC288 views1 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

ЦСКА — «Факел» 1:0. Воронежцы забили трижды — но Москва всё отменила Для «Факела» это был тот самый матч 4-го тура Альфа-Банк РПЛ , после которого особенно обидно смотреть на табло. Воронежцы увезли из Москвы поражение 0:1, хотя по ходу встречи трижды отправляли мяч в сетку ворот ЦСКА. Каждый раз гол отменяли из-за офсайда. В итоге хозяева получили право на пенальти, Иван Обляков его реализовал на 71-й минуте. Для

1

15 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC761 views5 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

«Краснодар» обыграл «Ахмат» — 1:0 В Краснодаре завершился матч 4-го тура Альфа-Банк российской премьер-лиги. Во встрече местная команда обыграла грозненский «Ахмат». Единственный гол в игре на 45-й минуте забил бразильский полузащитник «Краснодара» Кристиан. Благодаря победе «быки» с 12-ю очками закрепились на первом месте таблицы РПЛ. «Ахмат» за четыре тура набрал два очка и располагается на 13-м месте. 📸 ФК Кра

👍3👎1🔥1

15 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC923 viewsread 16 August 2026
Photo

«Ростов» и «Рубин» поделили очки — 1:1 «Ростов» на своем поле не смог обыграть казанский «Рубин» в матче 4-го тура Альфа-Банк российской премьер-лиги. Первый гол во встрече на 31-й минуте забил ростовский форвард Тимур Сулейманов. Ответный гол забил Жак-Жюльен Сиве — на 51-й минуте он отличился с пенальти. 📸 ФК Ростов #футбол #АльфаБанкРПЛ #РостовскаяОбласть #РостовНаДону #РеспубликаТатарстан #Казань sporta • dz

15 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC948 views3 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Матч «Сочи» — «Волга» перенесли Матч 6-го тура Лиги PARI между «Сочи» и ульяновской «Волгой», который должен был состояться на сочинском стадионе «Фишт» в 18:00 по Москве, отложили. Изначально игру перенесли из-за беспилотной опасности на более позднее время — 19:00. Однако начало встречи пришлось снова перенести. «На данный момент продолжает действовать режим беспилотной опасности на территории города Сочи! В свя

👎3

15 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC631 views4 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Дон принимает гостей: «Ростов» сыграет с «Рубином» после затяжной выездной серии. Превью от «Спорты» В субботу, 15 августа, «Ростов Арена» наконец-то распахнет свои двери для матчей Альфа-Банк РПЛ. После стартового турне с тремя выездными поединками подопечные Джонатана Альбы проведут первый домашний матч в рамках 4-го тура чемпионата. На этот раз их соперником станет казанский «Рубин». Разбираем форму команд и дела

21🔥1

15 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC589 viewsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Лидер Лиги PARI «Нижний Новгород» вырвал победу у «Текстильщика» — 3:1 «Нижний Новгород» в гостях одержал волевую победу над ивановским «Текстильщиком» в матче 6-го тура Лиги PARI. Первый гол в матче на 13-й минуте забил футболист хозяев Алексей Никитенков. На 72-й минуте за «Нижний Новгород» отличился Вячеслав Грулев, сделав счет на табло 1:1. На 86-й минуте гол забил Николай Калинский, на 90+3-й — Артем Соколов.

15 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC544 viewsread 16 August 2026
Video

🗽 «Ротор» — «Урал» 🐝 | Обзор матча 14.08.2026 Наш репортаж матча *тут* sporta • dzen • max • vk

15 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC613 viewsread 16 August 2026
Photo

ЦСКА благодаря голу с пенальти обыграл «Факел» — 1:0 Московский ЦСКА обыграл воронежский «Факел» в матче 4-го тура Альфа-Банк российской премьер-лиги. Единственный гол в матче забил Иван Обляков — он отличился с пенальти на 71-й минуте встречи в столице. ЦСКА с восемью очками сейчас идет на втором месте таблицы РПЛ. «Факел» с одним заработанным очком располагается на последнем, 16-м месте. 📸 РИА Новости / Алексан

15 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC700 views1 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

«Ленинградец» и «Арсенал» не забили друг другу голов «Ленинградец» сыграл с «Арсеналом» из Тулы в матче 6-го тура Лиги PARI. Соперники не смогли забить друг другу голов. В настоящий момент «Ленинградец» идет с тремя очками на 15-м месте турнирной таблицы, «Арсенал» набрал восемь очков и занимает 10-е место. 📸 Лига PARI #футбол #ЛигаPARI #ЛениградскаяОбласть #ТульскаяОбласть #Тула sporta • dzen • max • vk

1

15 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC775 views3 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

🫡 «СКА-Хабаровск» — «Велес» 🦬 | Обзор матча 15.08.2026 sporta • dzen • max • vk

1👍1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 151 posts we hold for @sportasmi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@sportasmi edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 45,137 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Спорта” (@sportasmi), 52,858 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sportasmi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.