Channel
@spookyalienstyles
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
274subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001951670288 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @spookyalienstyles |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/spookyalienstyles |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 274 | -11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 285 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:05 | 286 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (22 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,960 |
| Reactions total | 320 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
320 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5208954164998072538 | 74 | 23.1% | |
| custom 5390987678005101047 | 69 | 21.6% | |
| custom 5377827503073161659 | 61 | 19.1% | |
| custom 5299022433808836131 | 56 | 17.5% | |
| custom 5332729856838869603 | 27 | 8.44% | |
| custom 5262956073005896955 | 21 | 6.56% | |
| custom 5386554155064123164 | 12 | 3.75% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 320reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @spookyalienstyles. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
короче мне оторвало подушечку пальца(уже все зашили) и я хз когда вернусь к рисованию, пока что сил совсем нет☹️
custom 52089541649980725386custom 52990224338088361313custom 53778275030731616591
Решила не торопить себя с артом потому что отписки все равно не прекратятся Грусть печаль
custom 533272985683886960311custom 53865541550641231644custom 52990224338088361313custom 53778275030731616592
✨ иногда хочется просто исчезнуть в красивой эстетике, музыке и кадрах из любимых фильмов. invisible string — место, где живут: ✦ атмосферные эдиты; ✦ кино и сериалы; ✦ любимые актрисы и персонажи; ✦ музыка, которая остается в голове на весь день; ✦ мысли, от которых невозможно оторваться. если тебе близка эстетика “i hate it here so i will go to secret gardens in my mind” — ты уже знаешь, куда идти. ♡ @faithforgo…
custom 52990224338088361316
Вчера начала смотреть Литвиненко с Дэвидом Теннантом(очень нравица), потихоньку рисую и стараюсь переключаться между артами чтобы не словить артблок к которому я очень близка, поэтому кормлю вас процессниками…
custom 529902243380883613114custom 53909876780051010478custom 53327298568388696036custom 53778275030731616593
напомнило
custom 52629560730058969555custom 52089541649980725384custom 53909876780051010473
Это относится к фандому one direction, у меня тут много ребят оттуда.. на этом негатив заканчиваю и иду рисовать
custom 520895416499807253811custom 52990224338088361314custom 52629560730058969552
Мне неприятно, что обо мне публично и вполне очевидно высказываются в негативном ключе, но если я отвечу тем же, то почему-то именно я окажусь «плохой». Если бы человек просто попытался держать себя в руках, ничего из этого не произошло бы. Взрослая 25-летняя девушка уже несколько месяцев из-за ревности пытается выводить меня на конфликты при любом удобном случае. Сначала это было в личных сообщениях и я оставляла э…
custom 539098767800510104710custom 53327298568388696035custom 52990224338088361314custom 53865541550641231643custom 52629560730058969551
Но еще одна выходка и я все расскажу
custom 53909876780051010479custom 52629560730058969554custom 53778275030731616592
Очень хочется рассказать про человека, который в моем фандоме притворяется максимально безобидным и обвиняет меня в тех вещах, которые делает сам. Но я не хочу быть мразью ахаахах
custom 53909876780051010478custom 52629560730058969556custom 53778275030731616596
сегодня весь день рисую, не отписывайтесь пока
custom 537782750307316165915custom 53327298568388696035custom 53865541550641231645custom 52629560730058969552custom 52089541649980725381
кажется я попала в матрицу 😭 Примерно неделю назад я купила проходку на сервер Кузьмы в майнкрафт и отыгрываю там Элис Каллен и ровно с этого момента меня преследуют сумерки, буквально ВЕЗДЕ самое лучшее ии видео на свете
custom 539098767800510104711custom 52990224338088361318custom 53778275030731616596custom 52089541649980725381custom 52629560730058969551
Очень надеюсь, что вы дождетесь новых артов, потому что пока у меня мало свободного времени рисовать Покажу вам старый арт который скорее всего не закончу ахаха
custom 520895416499807253813custom 53909876780051010478custom 52990224338088361316custom 53778275030731616592
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @spookyalienstyles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
что вам больше нравится?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,274,877 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘰𝘬𝘺 𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘯” (@spookyalienstyles), 274 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spookyalienstyles.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.