Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Spongebob squarepants confession

@spongechh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,587subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001823882043
TypeChannel
Username@spongechh
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/spongechh

Growth

1,5821,5871,584.57 August 2026 — 1,582 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,582 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,587 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,581–1,588 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 19:181,587+5
7 Aug 2026, 21:181,582no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:511,582first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.34%
avg views ÷ 1,587 subscribers
Avg views / post
101
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (5 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,811
Reactions total97
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 21:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

97 reactions across 5 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3435.1%
❤‍🔥1919.6%
💋1616.5%
🥰99.28%
👏88.25%
55.15%
💘55.15%
🍓11.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC127 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

—Не знаю что там им сказали сделать Канал из за которого можно уйти в запой окончательно: @misskriperkanalchik Неанон Miss kriper 🪼⋆.ೃ࿔*:・ #тейк @spongechh @spongebob_confbot

👏842❤‍🔥1🥰1

6 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC137 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Привет !! Это свап ау с Кейном из УЦЦ, потому что я подумала, что они чем то похожи тгк: @reigenrnow 🪼⋆.ೃ࿔*:・ #тейк @spongechh @spongebob_confbot

💋16❤‍🔥32💘2🥰2

6 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC128 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

спонч блеб и планктон тгк @mayonnaisssee 🪼⋆.ೃ࿔*:・ #тейк @spongechh @spongebob_confbot

13🥰4❤‍🔥31🍓1

6 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC147 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

привет конфа, я делаю видео и мне нужны легендарные моменты из губки боба (желательно из старых сезонов) в виде коротких gif или фоток, они там максимум на пару секунду 🪼⋆.ೃ࿔*:・ #тейк @spongechh @spongebob_confbot

❤‍🔥6

6 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC136 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Я попытался анимировать ,, вышла какаятт дичь,😳ну лан😳 Неанон Ssels0 ( тгк : @irl_Krabs ) 🪼⋆.ೃ࿔*:・ #тейк @spongechh @spongebob_confbot

17❤‍🔥6💘3🥰2

5 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC149 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @bunsenisabeast_cfPhoto

𝓦𝓮𝓵𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮 𝓽𝓸... •》Bunsen is a beast confession ! (˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶) ╰┈➤ 😓: Я помню на никелодион показывали прикольный мульт, но название не помню... 😕: По нему почти ничего нет... 😄: Вы про "Чудище Бансена"? Так вам сюда!! 🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹 ⋮ ⌗ ┆《 В ϶ᴛ᧐ʍ κɸ ʙы ʍ᧐жᥱᴛᥱ ʙыᥴκᥲɜᥲᴛь ʙᥴё ᥴʙ᧐ё ʍнᥱнᥙᥱ нᥲᥴчᥱᴛ ϶ᴛ᧐ᴦ᧐ ʍу᧘ьᴛᥙκᥲ, ᥰρᥙᥴы᧘ᥲᴛь ᴛʙ᧐ρчᥱᥴᴛʙ᧐ ᥙ ᧐δᥴудᥙᴛь ᴛ᧐, ᥰ᧐чᥱʍу Бᥲнᥴᥱнᥲ нᥱɜᥲᥴ᧘ужᥱнн᧐ ɜᥲδы᧘ᥙ...·°՞(っ-ᯅ-ς)՞°·. 》 ⋆˙

5 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC102 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @AllFandoms_confessionsPhoto

- хотелось бы обсудить Удивительный Цифровой Цирк с кем-нибудь.! 🎪 - а мне показать своего персонажа по My little pony вселенной.. 😁 - а мне просто найти друзей по моим фандомам. 🤩 стоп. хватит. ! в данном «➖➖➖➖➖➖- ➖➖➖➖➖ ➖➖➖➖➖➖ ➖➖➖ ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖» « 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘀𝘀 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗳𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗼𝗺𝘀 » канале вы сможете найти того, кто вам необходим, а также друзей, которые состоя

5 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTC84 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ROLLWOODS_NETPhoto

– Тᥲκ ᥊᧐ᴛᥱ᧘᧐ᥴь δы ʙᥱᥴᴛᥙ κᥲнᥲ᧘ ᧐ᴛ ᧘ᥙцᥲ ᧘юδᥙⲙ᧐ᴦ᧐ 𐌡ᥲудᥲ. – А ⲙнᥱ δы ᤋᥲ ᧘юδᥙⲙ᧐ᴦ᧐ ᥰᥱρᥴ᧐нᥲжᥲ ᥙᤋ 𐌺ᥲᥴᥲᴦρᥲндᥱ. – А ⲙнᥱ δы ʙ᧐᧐δщᥱ ᥊᧐ᴛᥱ᧘᧐ᥴь ʙᥱᥴᴛᥙ κᥲнᥲ᧘ ᧐ᴛ ᧘ᥙцᥲ ᥴʙ᧐ᥱᴦ᧐ ᧐ᥴ ᥰ᧐ «𐌑᧐ύ ɯуⲙныύ д᧐ⲙ». 🥹🥹 дᴏбᴩᴏ ᴨᴏжᴀᴧᴏʙᴀᴛь ʙ ᴄᴇᴛь ᴋᴀнᴀᴧᴏʙ(ᴄᴇᴛᴋу) ᴨᴏ ʍуᴧьᴛᴄᴇᴩиᴀᴧу «Мᴏй Шуʍный Дᴏʍ» - ᴏᴛ ᴀʙᴛᴏᴩᴀ Кᴩиᴄ Сᴀʙинᴏ, ᴀ дᴀннᴀя ᴄᴇᴛь ᴋᴀнᴀᴧᴏʙ нᴀɜыʙᴀᴇᴛᴄя «Rᴏyᴀlwᴏᴏds_nᴇᴛ». 🥹🥹 ᕼᕕᙖᑌᛚᕕԱህЯ ! ВСЯ АДЕКВАТНАЯ СТОРОНА ФАНДОМА ЗДЕСЬ !

5 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC93 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dogconffPhoto

🤩              「      𝘿𝙊𝙂'𝙎          𝘾𝙊𝙉𝙁𝙀𝙎𝙎𝙄𝙊𝙉 」                                 🤩 ﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏ 🤩🥹 🔤ᴏᴛиᴛᴇ ᴨᴏдᴇᴧиᴛьᴄя ɸᴏᴛᴏᴦᴩᴀɸиᴇй ᴄʙᴏᴇй ᴄᴏбᴀᴋи🔤 🤩🥹 🔤ɜнᴀᴧи нᴏʙую ᴨᴏᴩᴏду и хᴏᴛиᴛᴇ ᴩᴀᴄᴄᴋᴀɜᴀᴛь ᴏ нᴇй🔤 🤩🥹 🔤ᴧи ᴨᴩᴏᴄᴛᴏ ᴧюбиᴛᴇ ᴄᴏбᴀчᴇᴋ и хᴏᴛиᴛᴇ ᴨᴩᴏᴄᴛᴏ ᴨᴏᴄʍᴏᴛᴩᴇᴛь нᴀ них🔤🔤🔤                        ﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋        Тᴏᴦдᴀ ʙᴀʍ ᴋ нᴀʍ!    В нᴀ

5 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC82 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @livetilltheendPhoto

[⚡️] — вы видели, что они вытворяют на гонках? [❤️] — ред булл это просто лучший энергетик [⭐️] — готова пересматривать их тт каждый день ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ➖➖➖➖➖ ✨ⲱⲉⳑⲥⲟⲙⲉ ⲧⲟ.. 🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 •▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬• ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤНАВИГАЦИЯ

5 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC83 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ULTRA_c0nfessionPhoto

❌❌🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙛𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣 + 𝙙𝙖𝙞𝙡𝙮 👁👁👁👁👁👁👁👁👁👁👁👁👁👁 🥹Ultrakill — динамичный шутер от первого лица в ретро‑стилистике, сочетающий эстетику старых игр (в духе эпохи PlayStation 1) с современными механиками передвижения и зрелищными боевыми приёмами. Игра вышла в ранний доступ на Windows 3 сентября 2020 года, разработчик — Арси «Hakita» Патала, издатель — New Blood Interactive. 🔤дᴇᴄь ʙы ʍᴏжᴇᴛᴇ дᴇᴧиᴛь ᴄʙᴏиʍ ᴋᴏнᴛᴇнᴛᴏʍ, ᴄʙяɜᴀнныʍ

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @spongechh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 146,879 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Spongebob squarepants confession” (@spongechh), 1,587 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spongechh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.