8 measurements spanning 23 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,521–1,524 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 15:25
1,524
+2
27 Aug 2026, 11:55
1,522
-1
20 Aug 2026, 18:22
1,523
-1
17 Aug 2026, 10:13
1,524
+1
13 Aug 2026, 13:57
1,523
+2
10 Aug 2026, 15:14
1,521
-2
7 Aug 2026, 21:34
1,523
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:41
1,523
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.02%
avg views ÷ 1,524 subscribers
Avg views / post
138
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
16 (27 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
550
Reactions total
37
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 21:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
144 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
65
45.1%
❤
37
25.7%
🥰
18
12.5%
👏
14
9.72%
🏆
4
2.78%
✍
3
2.08%
🤔
3
2.08%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Очень часто в поисках чего-то нового и неизведанного мы (я уж точно) забываем о наших парфюмерных жемчужинах, которые пылятся на дальних полочках шкафа😉
Gucci Rush - сегодня меня покорил и удивил как в первый раз! Какой же он раскайфовый, особенно в душную влажную погоду💦
Сладкие нектарные персики с бархатистой кожуркой и запахом модных парикмахерских из 90-х🍑☀️
Немного лака для волос, капелька шампунистости придаю…
Моя любовь к леденцам Hermes бескрайне безгранична🍭❤
Хватайте удачу за хвост и присмотритесь к ароматам Hermes на Randewoo на их еженедельной четверговой распродаже🎅🎅🎅
Цены просто огонь✨
10PARFSPOLI удешевит ваши покупки еще на 10%
Также не забывайте про возможность оплаты ЧАСТЯМИ!!!
Любите ароматы Hermes??? Есть летние любимчики среди моих экспонатов?
Новенькое🌼
И ЭТО ОЧЕНЬ ХОРОШО!!!!!!
🌼Luban Max Philip🌼
Для любителей и почитателей Existence Amouage
Чуть позже сделаю отдельный разбор с сравнением и моими сугубо личными выводами✏️
А пока наслаждаюсь🌼
Ребята, а у кого-нибудь из вас есть что сказать по поводу этого бренда?
Это настолько же хорошо насколько дорого?
Есть желание прикоснуться к прекрасному и заказать пробников, но пока не понимаю стоит ли оно того?😜
Вдруг вы забыли этот гениальный рецепт: а я вам напомню👋
Когда кулинарная фантазия иссякла, а хочется побаловать родных чем-то вкусненьким🍟
Горячие бутерброды - палочка-выручалочка!
Рецепт прост как 3 копейки❤
Багет
Любой соус
Котлетки (у меня из домашнего фарша)
Помидор
Лук
Сыр
В духовку на 10 мин
Вауля🥰
#spoliannna_вкусно
Други мои, это ОЧЕНЬ КРАСИВО✨
Сейчас все по порядку!
С ароматом Montale Full Incense я была знакома очень давно, но благополучно забыла про него (видимо, не распробовала и не прониклась до конца)
Недавно "на сдачу" бросила себе пробник, чтобы обновить эмоции😝
Ух! Какая же это красота! Аж дух захватывает✨
Ладан для меня здесь не про церковь, батюшек и кадило👆
Здесь карамельно-янтарная смола ладана, тягучая пряная…
Минутка ностальгии в этот дождливый летний день🫧☔️
Аромат - флешбэк в мои 20
И первый комплимент на парфюм я получила именно в этом Жасмине🌸
Прекрасные были ароматы у Ивроше)
Друзья!
Сегодня на Рандеву день приятных распродажных цен на бренд MEMO
Всё, что знаю у бренда - это роскошь, стиль и харизма✨
Обязательно советую присмотреться к моим любимчикам!
Выгодно выходят как флакончики на 8 мл, там и полноценные флаконы!
Memo Marfa
Головокружительный вальс белых цветов во главе с роскошной туберозой в плотном облаке взбитых сливок;
Memo Sherwood сливочно - кремовый сандал (все, как мы лю…
🥰5❤1
Signed Спирина Ольга
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @spoliannn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Spoliannna|Дышу духами” (@spoliannn), 1,524 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spoliannn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
