Channel
@spiral_dynamic_real
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
25subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003748851342 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @spiral_dynamic_real |
| Description | How it works? Examples and explanations 🌐 3 languages: English, español, русский. |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 8 April 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/spiral_dynamic_real |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 25 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 25 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
64 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 17 | 26.6% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 23.4% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 12.5% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 9.38% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 9.38% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 4.69% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 4.69% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 4.69% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.56% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 1.56% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I completed the Disruptive Strategy course from Harvard Business School Online. It was so valuable and so disruptively useful for my mind! The course offers far more than a framework for understanding disruptive innovation. It provides practical ways to think about strategy in a world of constant change and helps build organizations that can adapt and become more resilient over time (I mean it in antifragility conte…
🎉2👍1🔥1
🎓 About Harvard, Strategy, and the Question: “Is It Worth It?” After yesterday’s story about completing the Strategy Execution course at Harvard Business School Online, I was asked the same question several times: “Is it worth it?” A good question. 😉 I suppose the answer depends on why someone decides to study in the first place. ❌ If your goal is simply to add another line to your résumé, I’m not sure it’s the …
👍2👏1
Channel photo updated
🌞 Dear friends, I’m so excited — Harvard Business School has just confirmed my successful completion of the final Capstone project. I’m happy to be certified by HBS in Strategy Execution! 👩🎓 In the attached picture, I explained the changes I made to my last beauty business, which I owned and managed several years ago. It was profitable, but I saw more opportunities for sustainable growth and development. I had alr…
🎉4👍1
Visual representation of Real and Fake Green 🟢🔴 Lately, I’ve been noticing more and more “fake Green” in communication — especially in workplaces, leadership styles, and public conversations. On the surface, it sounds inclusive, empathetic, and caring. But underneath, the real intention is often still control, pressure, or manipulation. I think this contradiction is one of the hidden reasons behind so much tension…
👍2🤝1
Representación visual del Verde real y del Verde falso 🟢🔴 Estoy notando cada vez más “Verde falso” en diferentes formas de comunicación. Y eso me preocupa. Creo que todo esto está relacionado con la creciente tensión y el agotamiento emocional (burnout). Lo que me ayuda a mantener la calma y seguir siendo yo misma en estas situaciones es la comprensión clara de la diferencia entre lo auténtico y lo falso. 🤗
👍1
Dear friends, I posted in my other channel some thoughts about so popular “burnout”. https://t.me/volna_i_mir/393 Что думаете?
❤1
Morning, friends! 🌞 ☀️ Today I try to tell more about my favorite tool for understanding and for being understood. 🌏 Spiral Dynamics is not about “who is higher” — it’s about “who is responding to which conditions.” In international dialogue, business, families, and corporate environments, we are often dealing not with “difficult people,” but with different value systems and meaning-making logics. According to Sp…
👍3
How Richard D. Lewis Maps (compares) Cultures in action 🌍 ☀️ Hi, guys. Today I want to share some practical tips about noticing differences between cultures and countries. Take a look at the pictures.(To be honest, I spent a lot of time creating it, and this’s some funny story about my experience to give instructions to AI tools, I’ll share it with you later 😅) Richard Lewis visited more than 130 countries and cre…
❤3👌1🕊1
How Richard Lewis Maps Cultures 🌍 Richard Lewis compares cultures using a few key behavioral criteria to place countries on his famous cultural triangle: 🔹 Communication style Linear (direct, fact-based) vs. multi-active (emotional, expressive) vs. reactive (listening, indirect) 🔹 Time orientation Monochronic (structured, punctual) vs. flexible (fluid, relationship-driven) 🔹 Task vs. people focus Goal-oriented vs…
🔥4🤔3❤1
Good morning 🌅 🌐 In response to this comment, I would like to reveal a small feature between cultures based on the theory of the heat culture map. It is very subtly noted that the spiral dynamics are indeed oppositions that occur mainly between red and green, between blue and orange, and these are slightly differently configured sides of the spiral. 🌀 💡I will now briefly present Robert Lewis's theory, which provide…
❤3🔥3
☀️Greetings to all 👋 And thank you for joining me 🤗 ⏯️ Continuation of yesterday’s topic I'm trying to figure out how to distinguish between a real green level and a fake green level that is actually red.🟢🫥🔴 How can we make sure that we are really on the same wavelengths? Let’s try to clarify. 🌿 REAL GREEN vs FAKE GREEN (Red in disguise) 🟢 REAL GREEN (values: empathy, inclusion, shared meaning) Language • “W…
👍4🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @spiral_dynamic_real. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Spiral dynamic in real life (English, Español)” (@spiral_dynamic_real), 25 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spiral_dynamic_real.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.