Pretty apanya, prett!!
🤣45😭20
Channel
@spillyoosn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
75subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002167154084 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @spillyoosn |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 6 June 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/spillyoosn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 75 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:19 | 75 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1,283 reactions across 12 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤮 | 611 | 47.6% | |
| 🤣 | 163 | 12.7% | |
| ❤ | 151 | 11.8% | |
| 😭 | 120 | 9.35% | |
| 🔥 | 83 | 6.47% | |
| 👍 | 50 | 3.90% | |
| 😨 | 31 | 2.42% | |
| 😱 | 17 | 1.33% | |
| 🥴 | 16 | 1.25% | |
| 👎 | 11 | 0.857% | |
| 🖕 | 11 | 0.857% | |
| 💩 | 8 | 0.624% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 0.39% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 0.312% | |
| 😈 | 2 | 0.156% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,283reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2024 to 18 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Pretty apanya, prett!!
🤣45😭20
Gass teror akunnya @prretiestt dia kalau wtb pake nih akun wkwk biar gak ketauan nipu yeah😘😘😘
masih berani berkeliaran👏 menyala penipu 🔥
😱17👍5🔥4
pelakunya pernah on tele lagi, dan on cuma buat copot usn. besar kemungkinan ini akun juga bakal di jadiin ba lagi, so hati hati sama akun ini ya, kalau bisa sv dian penipu. 👤 6035377376 👦🏻 ell 🌐 @iijeonghan 🇮🇩 Indonesian 🕑 Diperbarui pada 15/03/2024
👍1
kasusnya makin flop, dan si penipunya ngga ada niatan buat balikin duit korban. gimana ya biar kasus nya viral? up di twt tapi kalau rame kadang hoki hokian, ada saran guys? oh ya kalau kalian kenal banget sama yg namanya dian tolong bantu bilangin ke dia ya, kalau bisa ke ortu nya juga, walaupun nom ya seberapa, tapi rata rata korban yg ketipu ratusan bahkan jutaan masih belum terima
Jadi si sakil ini kalau ngepremin akun tuh dibantu orang lain guys, dia selalu wtb teleprem harga 49-50k. Karna udah dichat masih gak ada balasan dan last seen nya dia matiin, nih gua spill yeah siapa tau kalian pernah transaksi sama dia diakun atau bot tertera ini. @prretiestt @kailaaybot
❤9
ada lagi guys korban si sakil yg ga ikut ke list. buat yg kenaa juga feel free buat chat ke bot yaa. biar orang orang tau kalau duit yg di bawa sakil ini ga sedikit. neraka buat lu sakil²
Haloo kak disini gua korbannya si el wkwkw gua udah pesen teleprem ama dia dari bulan januari itu persatu bulan aja, aman bgt satu bulan ama dia sampe bulan maret, nah ke april nya gua langsung pesen 6b tuh karna gua udah percaya awalnya ama dia wkwk wong sebelumnya aman aja kan? Nah di bulan april lah dia berulah gua pesen 6b dia bales nya lama bgt anjir gua cape ngejar2nya udah gitu di pertengan malah kestop prem g…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Sorry buat yang ke sangkut karena dana dan bank jago di up kesini. Karena sebelum di up pasti udah dicari tahu, dan ada bukti karena si Sakil ini pake nomor dana & bank jago itu, kaga asal up gitu aja. Nanti di up bukti nya, ditunggu aja.
🔥25👎11💯5👍4
kalau semisal kalian kenal sama orang ini boleh banget chat ke bot ya, biar nambah bukti lagi.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @spillyoosn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 819,813 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@spillyoosn named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Spill Sakil/Shaqil/El @yoosn @iijeonghan” (@spillyoosn), 75 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spillyoosn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.