😂😂😂
Channel
Spill seller ton penipu @owpheIia
@spillowpheIia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 22 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004313086648 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @spillowpheIia |
| Created | 20 October 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 22 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/spillowpheIia |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:22 | 2 | no change |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:47 | 2 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 20 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9963.6%
- avg views ÷ 2 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 199
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (20 October 2026 – 22 October 2026) |
| Views total | 2,192 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Oct 2026, 13:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 6
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Turn out gift nya rent 😂 niat banget nyari duit haram, ya? Seller rent gift hati hati sama no (+6282367938479) dia tiap selesai nipu langsung deak, terus login lagi dengan nomor yang sama.
(HFW!) boleh bantu FW ke chp, ch publik atau ke temen kalian masing-masing ya. Untuk sekarang total kerugian pribadi sudah mencapai Rp 869.000 supaya lebih aware lagi ke depannya. Kronologi cek di @spillowpheIia
Sticker, posted without a caption
Gua sebenernya gak mau ngespill-ngespill gini, tapi gua spill biar next gak ada yang jadi korban lagi. Kalo lu, Sey baca ini gua tunggu itikad baiknya ya
Ini gift yang nyangkut di acc dia t.me/nft/IonicDryer-
Ini gua waktu chat dia
Ini buat qr dia ya
Btw ini informasi tentang akun dia { @owpheIia — 8847691530 — a!lopsey } & tadi pake usn @keiitnci Buat yang baca bisa lebih hati-hati lagi sama usn di atas ya.
Gua ketemu A!lopsey dari comsect ini (https://t.me/giftfesss/1289612?comment=10420770) iya udah ga ada karena dia udah deak, kebetulan tadi gua mau beli ton yang emang jumlahnya ya lumayan banyak. Gua pikir ya dia trusted, karena ya kalo mau liat testi nya juga kayak meyakinkan parah. Ada bignom, RNK sampe 1k. Siapa yang gak akan ragu si gua tanya? Cuman ya balik lagi, tanggal sial emang gak ada di kalender, dan sial…
Halo sebelumnya gua mau spill A!lopsey atau seller ton yang tadi baru aja nipu gua. Total kerugian gua sebesar Rp 869.000 yang di mana ini bener-bener lumayan gede dan sangat jadi pembelajaran buat gua lebih hati-hati lagi ke depannya. Oh ya, bisa bantu sebarin ke manapun ya, biar ga ada lagi yang tertipu sama dia ini
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @spillowpheIia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Spill seller ton penipu @owpheIia” (@spillowpheIia), 2 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spillowpheIia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.