Channel
@spillkomuunitas
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 17 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003779622479 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @spillkomuunitas |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 26 February 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/spillkomuunitas |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:22 | 7 | no change |
| 17 Oct 2026, 20:47 | 7 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 26 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
442 reactions across 13 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤪 | 158 | 35.7% | |
| 🤮 | 96 | 21.7% | |
| 💩 | 44 | 9.95% | |
| 🥱 | 34 | 7.69% | |
| 👎 | 22 | 4.98% | |
| 🤣 | 22 | 4.98% | |
| 😭 | 18 | 4.07% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 3.62% | |
| 🖕 | 10 | 2.26% | |
| 🤡 | 6 | 1.36% | |
| 🥴 | 5 | 1.13% | |
| 🗿 | 4 | 0.905% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 0.452% | |
| 😴 | 2 | 0.452% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.452% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.226% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 442 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2026 to 27 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
fix anak @komuunitas pada pengangguran 🤣🤣 lagi lagi push sampe 1000, suka kalian ngamuk ngamuk, ngeliat ketikan orang orang tolol bikin happy banget ya, asik yang pada di fitnah dapat pahala, lu semua nampung dosa 🤪🤪
🤣18🤮15💩8🤪3❤2👍2🤡2🔥1
sekian.
🥱19💩7👎3🤪2🥰1
dan untuk admin @fixpricestars tolong dong kedepannya orang orang begini ga usah di kasih attention lebih, cukup pilih yang emang patut di diskusiin aja, untuk orang orang yang ga bisa jaga ketikan keluarin dari grup itu. orang orang kaya mereka cuma tau ngerusuh, padahal pendapat nol.
🤮38🤪15💩11🗿4❤3👎2🖕2🤡1
kalian bisa liat sendiri ya di @komuunitas bahkan permintaan maaf admin pun menjadi bahan bercandaan, dan menuding admin menggunakan Ai, mereka juga masih panas bahkan pihak yang paling menyuarakan protes tentang channel banned stars pun ga bisa menjaga perilaku audiancenya. teruntuk, @ihyunsuk sikap kooperatifnya dong. keinginan kamu untuk diskusi dan membawa aspirasi aspirasi yang masuk ke kamu kan udah di dengark…
🤮32🤪16💩15❤4🤡3👎1
another pihak pihak oot yang ada di @komuunitas bener bener masuk cuma buat ngerusuh doang, yang banyak oot itu mereka, tapi yang lebih galak mereka. di turutin kemauannya masih aja ngelunjak terus menerus, dan untuk orang orang yang di kick itu bukan karena mereka ngutarain opini, tapi karena mereka oot, ngetik pakai bahasa kasar, dan bawa bawa hal yang ga perlu ke ruang lingkup diskusi. ch spillan ini aku buat juga…
🤪14👎2😴2
jujur mereka ini ga punya respek sama sekali, padahal admin kesepakatan udah se respek itu sama mereka, buat mengerti sama penjelasan aja itu kayanya susah banget ya? out of topic melulu. padahal dari awal yang mau di diskusiin itu tentang ch @bannedstars di turutin, sama admin, pas di buka grup diskusi minta admin show on akun, di turutin, tapi buat paham sama penjelasan yang udah di jelasin dengan pelan pelan pun g…
🤪11❤3👎3💩3🖕2
and ini si @ruccas sumpah ya admin stars sabar banget ngadepin mereka 😭😭 dia ini banyak ngasih pendapat, tapi tetep aja di antara pendapat pendapat itu masih aja oot, pembahasan muter muter sama kaya yang sebelumnya, tentang perilaku admin. mereka semua emang ga bisa kondusif, dan memilah mana yang wajib di utamakan mana engga.
🤪15❤2
lanjut nih aku mau spill ini orang @tempuh, ga ngasih opini apa apa, cuma minta oas os oas os doang, ga turutin malah makin menjadi. dari awal semua yang kalian mau tuh udah banyak di turutin tapi ya ngelunjak. aku gatau kenapa admin kesepakatan stars mau nurutin mereka, bikin gedeg banget
🤪19😭6🤣4
terus selanjutnya aku mau spill ini orang @ceriaaz, yang dari awal bbc yang masuk ke pembahasan diskusi cuma beberapa, sisanya oot dan giring opini
🤪13😭11👎4❤2
ini orang pertama yang mau aku spill, si @uakuto hasil dari ootannya dia bakal aku drop di bawah, dan dia ini salah satu admin yang ada di @komuunitas ya. liat sendiri deh ketikan ga berbobotnya dia, ku drop di comsect karena OOTNYA DIA BANYAK, jadi biar rapih ku drop comsect aja
🤪16🤮4👎2😭1
sekarang, aku mau spill ketikan orang orang yang oot. padahal udah dapat arahan dari awal kalau mau tetap berpartisipasi dalam diskusi ya ga usah oot. kan yang di diskusiin beda, cuma emang dasarnya mereka bebal, aduh kalian liat aja deh sendiri kelakuannya.
🥱15👎3
nah, habis adanya himbauan itu beberapa orang ada yang mulai ngutarain opini, tapi ada juga yang masih oot. padahal udah di arahin terus terusan, tapi pembahasannya mau mutar, untuk yang satu ini aku jelasin ya permasalahannya, dan aku tau secara garis besar aja. jadi kayanya waktu oknum oknum sana itu samperin botnya admin stars, ada salah satu admin yang bertindak ceroboh dan kurang ngenakin memang. aku ga ngebela…
🤪15🥴5👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @spillkomuunitas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“spill kelakuan orang oot di ch diskusi stars” (@spillkomuunitas), 7 subscribers as measured 17 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spillkomuunitas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.