Channel
@spillandraichi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
31subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002413772115 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @spillandraichi |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 21 January 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/spillandraichi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 31 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 31 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
10 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤮 | 9 | 90.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2025 to 16 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Salah satu proofnya, sebenernya proof dia minta gaji duluan itu banyakan di gc admin agc tapi karena gue out udah lama jadi ga ke backup. Semoga cepet sadar dah ndraaa ndraa
Haloo admin! Kebetulan gue dulu jadi ct di agc nya andra ini, anaknya emang suka caper mampus, suka vn vn gajelas di gc pas lagi nimb tapi topiknya sama sekali ga berhubungan kayaaa yaaa sesuka dia aja vn. Anaknya suka minta gaji duluan sebelum end sesi, bahkan pernah sesi baru mulai diaa udah minta gaji dengan berbagai alasann
Id pelaku sekarang : @Dirtygh Berikut adalah buktinya : https://x.com/velyheel/status/1900446788668342331?s=46
👍1
waduh, ditunggu gebrakannya bang julian.
dia balik tele, username nya @Jjuliannu
terakhir ya setelah rent dia minta uang sama aku buat ongkos dia, sampai spam & call, terus dia blg dia jalan kaki, dia butuh uang buat naik gojek, dia gapunya kendaraan jg, anak Malang, aku tau posisi rumahnya dia waktu itu tp skrg gaaktauu krn aku hapus chat 😭😭😭
BUKANN FREELANCEE, ih beneran serabutann, kl freelance bahasanya terlalu bagus untuk kerjaan dia
jadi tanggal 12 Desember 2024 (?) - 25 Desember kayanya deh aku Rental dia VIP, move pf ke WhatsApp, untuk awal awal ya normal aja karna kita baru kayak usaha pendekatan gitu, terus dia ngajak OTP, aku terima, oh ya buat OTP yang dia ajak ini free, selanjutnya dia ajak OTP tp bayar, jadi setiap malam aku OTP sama dia aku harus bayar 85k ahahaha, aku ngga inget berapa kali aku call an sm dia krn sebanyak it…
WAIT AKU PLG DULU, nanti aku ceritain lengkapnya yaaa, dia suka minta uang buat makan jg, bahkan selama rent dia, sehari 100k tu ga cukup huat dia makan
dia selaluu minta minta terus, akunya gaenakan jg krn dia blg dia idup cm dr uang panti asuhan, jd aku tf tf terus :ooo
ih sebenernya panjang bgt, aku sm dia waktu itu 2 minggu an kayanya, tiap call pasti dia nyuruh aku buat call sex (?) even pas dia sharescreen tengah malem, dia ajakin nobar bok3p & dia desah gitu :c
🤮3
dia selalu blg suara aku bikin dia sange, dia jg selalu ngejelekin ex cust nya ke aku, dan agensi agensi nya (aku privrent pas rent dia waktu itu)
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @spillandraichi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,051,661 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@spillandraichi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Spill Skizo @bulgogu.” (@spillandraichi), 31 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spillandraichi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.