Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for spider madness 🕷

Channel

spider madness 🕷

@spidermadness

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

482subscribers

-33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002467414333
TypeChannel
Username@spidermadness
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/spidermadness

Growth

482515498.57 August 2026 — 515 subscribers7 August 2026 — 488 subscribers8 August 2026 — 488 subscribers16 August 2026 — 489 subscribers23 August 2026 — 482 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 15 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 477–520 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 00:26482-7
16 Aug 2026, 05:57489+1
8 Aug 2026, 04:31488no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:59488-27
7 Aug 2026, 15:57515first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 21 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.53%
avg views ÷ 482 subscribers
Avg views / post
17.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
23.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held16 (21 May 20267 August 2026)
Views total17
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💋562.5%
💔337.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC17 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

С этого момента канал переходит в руки нового владельца – @PorscheCa / Порша. В скором времени постараемся возобновить работу канала, наберитесь терпения.

💋3💔1

Signed ᴅᴇsɪɢɴᴇʀ

29 May 2026, 10:05 UTC254 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

GOOD 🕷️ MORNING Первые робкие лучи солнца,пробивающихся сквозь листву. Лапки подтягиваются,дабы размяться. А Тело ещё хранит тепло ночного убежища,но воздух уже звенит свежестью раннего утра. Пора... Паук осторожно выбирается из уютной паутины — своего теплого дома. Лапы легко скользят по шёлковым нитям,оглядывается: вокруг уже шевелятся другие пауки — его маленькое счастье. Сегодня они снова о

Signed ᅠHA1S0N.

25 May 2026, 12:05 UTC142 viewsread 8 August 2026

на этом наша рубрика заканчивается. с вами был лиан, вскоре встретимся вновь. 🤍буду рад отзывам - @spider_bbot результаты сможете увидеть тут - архив

Signed 𝐋!𝐚𝐧ˢᵐ

25 May 2026, 11:05 UTC310 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ㅤ💘 𝙄𝙉𝙏𝙀𝙍𝘼𝘾𝙏𝙄𝙑𝙀 « враги секс дружба » → 14/14 ведущий составляет пары с профилями, а после делает опрос. с помощью опроса решается, что между этой парой? секс, вражда или дружба.

Signed 𝐋!𝐚𝐧ˢᵐ

25 May 2026, 10:57 UTC110 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

привет хорошие, я очень скучал. с вами лиан

  1. рубрикааа82%
  2. свадьба18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed 𝐋!𝐚𝐧ˢᵐ

25 May 2026, 10:57 UTC83 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

GOOD 🕷️ MORNING Первые робкие лучи солнца,пробивающихся сквозь листву. Лапки подтягиваются,дабы размяться. А Тело ещё хранит тепло ночного убежища,но воздух уже звенит свежестью раннего утра. Пора... Паук осторожно выбирается из уютной паутины — своего теплого дома. Лапы легко скользят по шёлковым нитям,оглядывается: вокруг уже шевелятся другие пауки — его маленькое счастье. Сегодня они снова о

Signed 𝐋!𝐚𝐧ˢᵐ

22 May 2026, 05:27 UTC69 viewsread 8 August 2026

союзы не кидать, спим!

Signed CRYBABY ˢᵐ 𝐇Ű𝐁𝐑Î𝐒

22 May 2026, 05:26 UTC75 viewsread 8 August 2026

набор к нам, давайте хорошики

Signed CRYBABY ˢᵐ 𝐇Ű𝐁𝐑Î𝐒

22 May 2026, 05:26 UTC86 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ㅤ ⚡️ 🔠🔠🔠🔠 ㅤㅤㅤ 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 ⚡️ Ночь опустилась на лес, и прохладный воздух коснулся тончайших нитей паутины, сплетенной с невероятным мастерством. Где-то на дальней ветке, в своем уютном, надежно скрытом доме, паук готовился к долгому сну. Он выпустил нить и начал плавно скользить по паутине. Его восемь ног уверенно держались за волокно, перебирая его с грацией. Паутина служила ему дорогой

Signed CRYBABY ˢᵐ 𝐇Ű𝐁𝐑Î𝐒

21 May 2026, 12:52 UTC46 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 на этом наша рубрика подошла к концу. с вами был Нэй, жду вас снова.) 🖤 так же можете написать отзыв о моей прекрасной работе.🔗 @spider_bbot всех цемаю в щечки🤩 так же не забываем про наш архив. @archivspider

Signed CRYBABY ˢᵐ 𝐇Ű𝐁𝐑Î𝐒

21 May 2026, 12:51 UTC42 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩💎💎💎💎💎🤩🤩🤩

💋1

Signed CRYBABY ˢᵐ 𝐇Ű𝐁𝐑Î𝐒

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @spidermadness. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 May 2026, 10:57 UTCFinal Results11 voters

привет хорошие, я очень скучал. с вами лиан

  1. рубрикааа82%
  2. свадьба18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 315,031 of 1,584,733entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“spider madness 🕷” (@spidermadness), 482 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spidermadness.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.