Channel
@sperbervv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
99subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002240229434 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sperbervv |
| Created | 2 June 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sperbervv |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:58 | 99 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 102 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 102 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 2 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (2 June 2024 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 88 |
| Reactions total | 56 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
282 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5354858438880932589 | 79 | 28.0% | |
| custom 5411100314067545478 | 72 | 25.5% | |
| custom 5256245663347255132 | 65 | 23.0% | |
| custom 5222446057434132218 | 38 | 13.5% | |
| custom 5308012886986087876 | 28 | 9.93% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 282reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2024 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sperbervv. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 June 2024 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Москвичка крутая девчонка Бритни и серая нерд мышка Стейси вновь встретились 😍😍😍 #щп #семейнаяжизнь #ксюшасониканон
custom 535485843888093258910custom 52562456633472551327custom 53080128869860878764custom 54111003140675454781
Signed Шпербер
Кмм с Ойле🤕 #signalis #art #commission
custom 541110031406754547819custom 53548584388809325899custom 53080128869860878766
Signed Шпербер
Мне иногда скетчи нравятся даже больше, чем сам результат, поэтому хочу закинуть и сюда его до полноценки(( (Да-да, моя оска паучишка, её величество Мюриель) #скетч #ос
custom 541110031406754547815custom 53548584388809325898custom 52562456633472551327
Signed Шпербер
Не нашла ей предназначения, я придумывала оску для человека за день до того как мы перестали общаться, но сейчас смотрю на этот скетч, и даже не знаю что с ней делать, вроде она мне нравится, но пылится, даже если доведу её до ума, вряд-ли я смогу её продать как адопт, чёт как-то не ещкере, друзья. #скетч #ос
custom 535485843888093258914custom 52224460574341322187custom 54111003140675454785custom 52562456633472551322custom 53080128869860878761
Signed Шпербер
С днём рождения мою дорогую женщину и мать моих детей, поздравьте её пожалуйста 🧡🧡 #поздравления #ос
custom 525624566334725513213custom 535485843888093258910custom 54111003140675454785custom 52224460574341322184custom 53080128869860878762
Signed Шпербер
Наш недееспособный пациент в меде #щп
custom 525624566334725513215custom 53548584388809325899custom 52224460574341322188
Signed Шпербер
Села — дала. ✧*。 Я покажу тебе, что такое love is Ты танцуешь, как Дженнифер Лопес..♪ #ffxv #FinalFantasyXV #CindyAurum #арты
custom 530801288698608787615custom 522244605743413221811custom 535485843888093258911custom 52562456633472551323
Signed Шпербер
Та называемый спойлер👁️ #спойлеры #арты
custom 541110031406754547813custom 52562456633472551328custom 53548584388809325897custom 52224460574341322182
Signed Шпербер
‼️ Новости канала ‼️ Хай пиплы, тут вы все знали меня как "Героиновый Шейк". Этой частью моей жизни я больше не дорожу. Причин тому множество. Во-первых, сам псевдоним стал вызывать у меня отторжение, личную неприязнь. Во-вторых... ну как-то возникли недопонимания касательно "пропаганды наркотиков". Мой канал был назван в честь модного направления "Героиновый шик", отражая мой первоначальный стиль в 2023 году (от ко…
custom 541110031406754547814custom 525624566334725513210custom 52224460574341322186custom 53548584388809325891
Signed Шпербер
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @sperbervv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,175,554 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“༒Shperber༒” (@sperbervv), 99 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sperbervv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.