4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,057–3,075 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 09:17
3,059
-3
10 Aug 2026, 21:51
3,062
-6
7 Aug 2026, 20:11
3,068
-5
7 Aug 2026, 08:46
3,073
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1,058 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
401
37.9%
👍
283
26.7%
🔥
218
20.6%
🐳
76
7.18%
custom 5242434169509791394
41
3.88%
🫡
37
3.50%
👀
2
0.189%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,058reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2023 to 11 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
113
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 18 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
17
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @spekulyantcrypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 May 2023 to 11 October 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔎| #deepresearch
Отец рестейкинга – EigenLayer
Сегодня я начинаю серию глубоких ресерчей проектов из публичного ончейн-портфеля. Честь открывать эту рубрику выпала первопроходцу и отцу рестейкинг сектора – EigenLayer.
- фундаментальный разбор проекта
- детальное изучение вестингов, модели токеномики и ютилити
- варианты использования токена $EIGEN в defi для доп. доходности
- ончейн анализ токенхолдеров
- и мн…
💼| #oncahinportfolio
Цели на портфель и market vision
Перед тем как продолжить краткое саммэри по уже отобранным активам было бы правильным задать цели по доходности для публичного портфеля к концу этого цикла:
a) Консервативный исход - 10х
b) Ожидаемый исход - 15х
c) Благоприятный исход - 20х+
Если вы состоите в спекуля́ции или на регулярной основе посещаете подкасты/опен майки Трибуны - то вы уже знакомы с мо…
💼| #oncahinportfolio
Первые закупы и divine strategy
Я думаю многие из вас уже успели изучить портфель и пробежаться по активам. А если ты по какой-то причине пропустил прошлый пост, то начать советую именно с него.
Для начала стоит пояснить логику отбора позиций в портфель:
a) идея в том, чтобы выбрать из каждого сильного нарратива по одному самому сильному игроку
b) у актива должно быть нулевое либо минимально…
💼| #oncahinportfolio
Врываюсь с двух ног вместе с экспериментом на 30.000$
Здарова спекулянты 💼
Крайний раз я выходил на связь аж семь месяцев назад во время локального пика рынка, лишь
для того, что-бы заколить вам надвигающийся дамп. После чего
я вновь пропал с радаров, что-бы продолжить работу над фондом.
И вот спустя пол года лютейшей крови на рынке, мы наконец-то приблизились к локальному дну рынка альткоино…
🎙️| #подкаст
Здарова работяги 💼
С каждым днем рынок становится все ближе к циклу «депрессия». Ликвидности с каждым днем все меньше, проекты один за другим банкротятся и закрываются, а депозиты обычных работяг превращаются в пыль. Именно в такие моменты у всех пропадает вера в этот рынок и желание на нем зарабатывать. Все больше и больше инфлов начинают писать про работу в веб2 и про не связанные с криптой идеи для …
Давно я вас не баловал халявными инвайтами в спекуляцию, пора возобновить эту традицию:
Инвайт номер раз
Инвайт номер два
Скорее всего ты не успел, а знаешь почему? Потому что у тебя не включены уведомления на мой канал, исправляйся. Теперь время от времени сюда снова будут падать инвайты 😎
Upd. Меньше секунды, скоро еще будут возможности.
Инвестор > Абузер
Здарова спекулянты 🧠💼
Сегодня я хочу обсудить на первый взгляд ни чем не связанные между собой темы, но дайте мне 5 минут и вы поймете к чему это я. Сейчас мы с вами:
- Разберем безумно простую, а главное ноуриск инвест идею.
- Обсудим почему Airdrop #2 и #3 от Optimism несправедливо захейченны мамкиными абузерами.
- Узнаем почему модель раздачи Optimism является идеальным вариантом для поощрен…
🐳38🫡18👍13🔥7❤🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @spekulyantcrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 357,825 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@spekulyantcrypto named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@gefest_forge named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@compositemannnn named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@vladbulat named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“спекуля́нт” (@spekulyantcrypto), 3,059 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spekulyantcrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
