๐ฑ๐น DEVID PIERIS ๐ฑ๐น WON THE TOSS AND DECIDED TO BAT โ๏ธโ๏ธ
Signed Toss line

Channel
@speedytossline
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry
9,913subscribers
-2,241 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002284155038 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @speedytossline |
| Description | HERE WE PROVIDE THE RESULTS OF EACH & EVERY TOSS OF CRICKET ๐WE ARE LIGHTNING FAST, ACCURATE & OFFICIAL. |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 19 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/speedytossline |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 9,913 | -178 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 10,091 | -114 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 10,205 | -66 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 10,271 | -126 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 10,397 | -120 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 10,517 | -117 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 10,634 | -41 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 10,675 | -201 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 10,876 | -34 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:51 | 10,910 | -88 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 10,998 | -87 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 11,085 | -179 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 11,264 | -129 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 11,393 | -150 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 11,543 | -192 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 11,735 | -104 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 11,839 | -99 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 11,938 | -216 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 12,154 | first reading |
654 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pagesof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 268 of 642 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 654 (7 August 2026 โ 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 289,830 |
| Reactions total | 1,473 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 29 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
1,473 reactions across 260 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 831 | 56.4% | |
| ๐ | 121 | 8.21% | |
| ๐คฃ | 106 | 7.20% | |
| ๐คฌ | 92 | 6.25% | |
| ๐ฅ | 73 | 4.96% | |
| ๐ | 37 | 2.51% | |
| ๐ | 32 | 2.17% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 24 | 1.63% | |
| ๐คฎ | 18 | 1.22% | |
| ๐ | 17 | 1.15% | |
| ๐ฉ | 16 | 1.09% | |
| ๐ญ | 12 | 0.815% | |
| ๐คก | 11 | 0.747% | |
| ๐ | 9 | 0.611% | |
| ๐ | 8 | 0.543% | |
| ๐ฏ | 8 | 0.543% | |
| ๐ | 7 | 0.475% | |
| ๐ | 7 | 0.475% | |
| ๐ | 6 | 0.407% | |
| ๐ | 6 | 0.407% | |
| 14 further kinds | 32 | 2.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 268 of the 654 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 1,473reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 654 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @speedytossline. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 654 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
๐ฑ๐น DEVID PIERIS ๐ฑ๐น WON THE TOSS AND DECIDED TO BAT โ๏ธโ๏ธ
Signed Toss line
๐น๐ฒ NICA ๐น๐ฒ WON THE TOSS AND DECIDED TO BAT โ๏ธโ๏ธ
Signed Toss line
๐น๐ฒ MKCC ๐น๐ฒ WON THE TOSS AND DECIDED TO BAT โ๏ธโ๏ธ
Signed Toss line
๐ฐ๐ณ NIAZI TIGER ๐ฐ๐ณ WON THE TOSS AND DECIDED TO BAT โ๏ธโ๏ธ
Signed Toss line
๐ฐ๐ณ JUNIOR BOY ๐ฐ๐ณ WON THE TOSS AND DECIDED TO BAT โ๏ธโ๏ธ
Signed Toss line
๐ฐ๐ณ MEHRI DIAMOND ๐ฐ๐ณ WON THE TOSS AND DECIDED TO BAT โ๏ธโ๏ธ
Signed Toss line
๐ฆ๐บ AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL ๐ฆ๐บ WON THE TOSS AND DECIDED TO BAT โ๏ธโ๏ธ
Signed Toss line
๐ฆ๐ด TRINBAGO RIDER ๐ฆ๐ด WON THE TOSS AND DECIDED TO BOWL โ๏ธโ๏ธ
Signed Toss line
๐ณ๐ฟ NEW ZEALAND - A ๐ณ๐ฟ WON THE TOSS AND DECIDED TO BOWL โ๏ธโ๏ธ
Signed Toss line
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Alex
Video, posted without a caption
โค1
Signed U R U D E V S I N G H ยฎ๏ธ
ALLAH HAFIZ MILTE H DIECT SUNDAY KO AGAR NETWORK SHI HUA RASTE ME TO AUGA TELEGRAM PR KAL BI
๐3โค2
Signed BANIYA DON (ALLAH KA BAAP)
Showing the 12 most recent of 654 posts we hold for @speedytossline. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank โ 104,955 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
@speedytossline named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant โ a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐บ๐ท๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ซ๐ ๐ป๐ถ๐บ๐บ ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฌยฎ๏ธโก๏ธ๐ชฌโ (@speedytossline), 9,913 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/speedytossline.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.