Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

speculator1337

@speculator_1337

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,101subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002005462150
TypeChannel
Username@speculator_1337
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/speculator_1337

Growth

1,1011,1061,103.57 August 2026 — 1,106 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,105 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,105 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,102 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,101 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,100–1,107 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:241,101-1
10 Aug 2026, 04:001,102-3
8 Aug 2026, 00:031,105no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:171,105-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:411,106first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 24 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

367 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 519277554718005231414439.2%
custom 532115470093283032612333.5%
custom 532101395914950747810027.2%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 367reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2026 to 20 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 12 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @speculator_1337. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 February 2026 to 20 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 May 2026, 08:52 UTC≈1,330 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

по 65-67 затариваемся

custom 519277554718005231424

16 May 2026, 15:25 UTC≈1,600 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

кто задается вопросом куда я пропал, то я все это время веду второй канал: t.me/wadewillson13

custom 532115470093283032613

27 Mar 2026, 11:09 UTC≈2,980 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🙋

custom 519277554718005231419custom 53211547009328303267custom 53210139591495074785

25 Mar 2026, 16:31 UTC≈1,820 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @wadewillson13Photo

кто ещё вам такое покажет?

custom 532101395914950747826custom 519277554718005231411custom 53211547009328303269

17 Mar 2026, 13:33 UTC≈1,820 views28 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

вопросы?

custom 532115470093283032615custom 53210139591495074787custom 51927755471800523146

12 Mar 2026, 11:57 UTC≈1,580 views31 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @wadewillson13

любая стратегия, любой «грааль» или сетап работает лишь временно и рано или поздно перестаёт давать трейдеру преимущество стратегия дает преимущество, пока её используют немногие, она ловит неэффективность и работает в текущей фазе рынка проходит время и edge постепенно размывается то, что вчера давало стабильный профит, сегодня даёт больше стопов, не доходит до тейков, пилит уровни и ломает структуру многие в эт

custom 532115470093283032623custom 51927755471800523147custom 53210139591495074781

6 Mar 2026, 12:11 UTC≈1,760 views31 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

да, я лонговал

custom 519277554718005231421custom 53210139591495074785custom 53211547009328303265

5 Mar 2026, 10:44 UTC≈1,400 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💁‍♂️

custom 519277554718005231424custom 53210139591495074787custom 53211547009328303265

3 Mar 2026, 17:23 UTC≈1,810 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

активно работаем в приватке

custom 532115470093283032629custom 51927755471800523147custom 53210139591495074782

24 Feb 2026, 12:03 UTC≈1,550 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

какие у вас хобби

custom 532101395914950747821custom 53211547009328303265custom 51927755471800523144

24 Feb 2026, 08:15 UTC≈1,650 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

что я нарисовал

custom 532101395914950747822custom 51927755471800523147custom 53211547009328303266

24 Feb 2026, 07:31 UTC≈1,440 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

че думаете вообще?

custom 519277554718005231414custom 53211547009328303266custom 53210139591495074784

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @speculator_1337. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“speculator1337” (@speculator_1337), 1,101 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/speculator_1337.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.