Channel
@spectrum_labs
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,392subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001489275471 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @spectrum_labs |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/spectrum_labs |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 1,392 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 1,392 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 September 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
105 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 34 | 32.4% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 22.9% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 13.3% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 5.71% | |
| 💩 | 5 | 4.76% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 4.76% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 3.81% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 2.86% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.90% | |
| 🤷 | 2 | 1.90% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.952% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.952% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.952% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.952% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.952% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.952% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 September 2023 to 4 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
There seems to be a large number of users receiving a token with a name similar to "SPF reward ticket" and it has a link to a site where you connect your wallet. This is a scam. The site may look similar to ours but please do not follow these links. Our team will not send these sort of token promotions to our users. If these tokens are received, please ignore or send to a CEX to burn.
👍4❤1💩1
SNEK is now with us! More exciting stuff will be very soon with both Spectrum Network and Splash 💦 https://vxtwitter.com/spectrumxnet/status/1762548624624382428
👍1💩1
At the end of Epoch 464, the Spectrum Finance ISPO will end, a lot of you are probably wondering what happens next? Users who were delegated to our ISPO and added liquidity in LBSP pools can claim their tokens from our rewards page found here! https://app.spectrum.fi/cardano/rewards As we stated before the ISPO/LBSP began, we will burn the remainder of the 8% supply after epoch 466 when all rewards have been made a…
👍6💩2
Don't forget to vote for us in Catalyst f11! We have some really exciting features in progress that will help push Cardano DeFi to the next level! https://twitter.com/spectrumxnet/status/1750511988772409683?t=UkY9NiGCRqKmSkvr_k_eWw&s=19
👍1👎1
We are pleased to announce the results of 2023 and the plans for 2024! 🚀 https://vxtwitter.com/spectrumxnet/status/1741830168581177525
❤1👍1👎1🔥1
A bit more clarity regarding Splash thing https://twitter.com/SpectrumLabs_/status/1733251115423003061
❤1🌚1🍌1
So what is Splash... https://twitter.com/SpectrumLabs_/status/1732811635062874245
❤1💩1🥱1😁1
We are happy to present our Catalyst 11 proposals ! Introducing 2 universal framworks to prepare Cardano DeFi for the bull run https://twitter.com/SpectrumLabs_/status/1732757871102775648
🤷2❤1👍1🔥1
The LBSP abuse loophole has now been closed. Starting today, only chosen whitelisted pools will be participating in the LBSP program. The list is slightly different from what was presented earlier when the program was first announced. The new whitelist was generated based on the popularity of the asset and the depth of liquidity on Spectrum DEX. The full list can be found at the end of this tweet. To participate in…
❤1👍1
A long-awaited $RSN token is now launched on Ergo! Rosen Bridge is a bridge that finally solves the security problem! What is far more exciting is that it can be scaled to other non-UTxO chains! Congrats team! 🎉 https://twitter.com/RosenBridge_erg/status/1717221708095004984?t=uiVxy15BNsbWdarS_JelyA&s=19
🔥9🤔2❤1👍1🤡1
Recently we've made a few significant updates to the Spectrum Network white paper🧻 TL;DR ...Quite technical stuff 😅 Here they are: 1. We integrated the synchronization mechanism which solves the global synchronization problem by leveraging Proof Of Stake (PoS). This mechanism eliminates the need for a global clock among consensus participants. The only remaining security assumption is that the parties have local c…
👍3🔥1
💧☔️ A DripDropz-like claiming interface is live! If you are participating in Spectrum ISPO, you can claim without connecting your wallet to the interface. Just copy and paste your stake or payment address into the input field and voila! 🎉 Stake with us in 🟣 SPF0 and 🟣 SPF1! Check here 👉 https://app.spectrum.fi/cardano/rewards/ispo
👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @spectrum_labs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 642,473 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Spectrum Finance” (@spectrum_labs), 1,392 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spectrum_labs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.