Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 40 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 174–175 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 01:38
174
-1
8 Sept 2026, 22:41
175
+1
8 Aug 2026, 14:16
174
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:09
174
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
35 reactions across 6 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
18
51.4%
👍
3
8.57%
💯
3
8.57%
😁
3
8.57%
🙏
3
8.57%
custom 5220168981737916206
2
5.71%
custom 5368562433981947135
1
2.86%
👏
1
2.86%
🥰
1
2.86%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💕Приглашаем протестировать и оценить наш новый учебник от SPEAKуй! Вам - бесплатные знания по английскому языку, нам - понимание, что можно улучшить в нашем продукте
Что нужно делать?
✨1. Напишите в группу, что хотите участвовать в тестировании
✨2. Вам будут отправляться главы учебника в хронологическом порядке
✨3. Ваша задача - читать, изучать их, делать задания, в общем — учиться. А также давать свой фидбек по пре…
💃💁♀"Я не знаю" - порой любимый ответ. Даже если мы все знаем, иногда хочется просто сказать эту прекрасную фразу ради заветной тишины… Знакомо, правда ведь?
Чем же в итоге заменить привычное "I don`t know"??
🧚♀ I have no clue - я без понятия
🧚♀ Who knows? - да кто ж его знает?
🧚♀ How should I knw? - мне то откуда знать?
🧚♀ Your guess is as good as mine - я знаю не больше, чем ты
❤ - если нравятся такие альтер
🏆🇪🇸 Поздравляем ИСПАНИЮ!
⚽️ И с этим замечательным событием вспомнилось прекрасное китайское слово - ПИСЮН - тренировать. А ПИСЮН ШИ - тренер. Ну почти так:))
⚽️ 培训师 - péi xùn shī - тренер
⚽️ 培训 - péi xùn - тренировать \ обучать
Такой футбол нам нравится??? 🥰
💥Изучение иностранных языков действительно может замедлить старение мозга. К такому выводу пришла международная группа учёных после исследования с участием почти 900 человек.
🧠Специалисты просканировали мозг 728 добровольцев с помощью магнитоэнцефалографии, а затем проверили результаты ещё на 144 людях. Данные проанализировал искусственный интеллект.
🤙Оказалось, что у людей, говорящих на двух языках, мозг в среднем…
😬Когда нибудь я перестану шутить над китайскими словами, но это точно будет не сегодня. Рассмотрим ассортимент богатства?? (Кстати, это не полный список слов, лишь мааааленька часть)
🌸回 (huí) — гл. возвращаться; поворачивать, разворачивать
🌸会 (huì) — мод.глаг. мочь, уметь, знать
🌸悔 (huǐ) — иер. сожалеть, раскаиваться
🌸灰 (huī) — прил. серый
🌸汇 (huì) — иер. стекаться, сливаться воедино
🌸惠 (huì) — сущ. благодеяние…
Я китайский не учу, но было бы прикольно потыкать🤓44%
Ну не…0%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @speakyi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Я китайский не учу, но было бы прикольно потыкать🤓44%
Ну не…0%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SPEAKуй | Английский, Китайский 🇬🇧🇨🇳” (@speakyi), 174 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/speakyi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
