Channel
@spartacats
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
13,426subscribers
-85 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001733188760 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @spartacats |
| Description | SpartaCats is a memecoin based on confrontation between cats and dog-related memecoins. Website - https://spartacats.com/ Telegram chat - https://t.me/SpartaCat Twitter - https://twitter.com/CatsSparta |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/spartacats |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 13,426 | -10 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 13,436 | -17 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 13,453 | -15 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 13,468 | -10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 13,478 | -13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:30 | 13,491 | -15 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 13,506 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 13,511 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6,581 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,895 | 44.0% | |
| ⚡ | 1,538 | 23.4% | |
| 👏 | 1,311 | 19.9% | |
| 🤩 | 735 | 11.2% | |
| 😎 | 94 | 1.43% | |
| custom 5443127090624875609 | 8 | 0.122% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,581reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2024 to 30 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @spartacats. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2024 to 30 September 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
New week, new market moves! 🌍 Start the week with a roundup of key crypto developments and global politics: Bitcoin ETF updates, altcoin movements, and global election outcomes. How might they influence crypto, especially $PURR? 🔗 How do you think this week's political events will affect crypto markets? Let’s discuss! 😍Web 💬Chart 🏅DEX 😍WIXI
❤116🤩86⚡65👏56😎8
Crypto’s heating up, Spartacats! $PURR still rising on Wixi Exchange! 🐾 Talk about recent movements in the broader market. What’s happening with BTC, ETH, and $PURR? Promote SpartaCats on Wixi, leveraging trading and staking opportunities. 🔗 What's your trading strategy this week? Got $PURR in your sights? 😍Web 💬Chart 🏅DEX 😍WIXI
❤39👏21😎11🤩10⚡7
What's up with inflation and recession fears in crypto? 🌎 Share insights into global inflation trends, recession warnings, and the central banks’ strategies. Link how these macroeconomic trends might influence crypto market shifts, especially for $PURR. 🔗 Could another crypto boom be on the horizon because of this? Let us know what you think! 😍Web 💬Chart 🏅DEX 😍WIXI
❤162👏81⚡46🤩16😎9
Can we talk about this billboard, though?" 🐾 A recent political ad has the internet buzzing: "Eat Less Kittens." So, who else saw this kitten-themed political billboard? Whether it’s a joke gone wrong or right, it's got us thinking—should SpartaCats get into politics? 🐾 🔗 What do you think? Sound off in the comments! 😍Web 💬Chart 🏅DEX 😍WIXI
❤146🤩87👏62⚡15😎6
TOKEN2049 is around the corner! The world’s largest crypto event, TOKEN2049, is happening in Singapore this week. It’s THE spot for connecting with crypto leaders, visionaries, and the builders shaping the future of our beloved blockchain universe. 🚀 This year’s event features over 20,000 attendees, 7,000 companies, and 300 speakers from across the globe! Big names like Solana’s co-founder, Binance’s CEO, and Arthu…
❤128👏99🤩44⚡42😎7
🚀 SpartaCats isn't just about reaching for the stars; we're bringing them right into our paws! But let’s be real — none of this would be possible without you, our amazing community. From listing on Wixi to placing banners near SpaceX, and forging game-changing partnerships, every step of this journey has been driven by your passion and belief in our vision. We’re beyond grateful to have you with us as we turn big d…
❤159👏77⚡73🤩15😎4
🐾 Every step we take is calculated, every move we make is towards building something bigger and better. SpartaCats is making its mark. Our listing on Wixi wasn’t just about expanding trading options — it was about solidifying our presence in the market. Trading with leverage up to 100x is no small feat, but it’s just one of the ways we’re giving our community the tools they need to succeed. From massive airdrops to…
❤105🤩69⚡54👏31😎16
🐱 Curious how we’ve managed to build such a robust community and secure prime listings? It’s not just about the token; it’s about the partnerships we’ve forged along the way. ⚡️Our collaboration with Venom Network is a prime example. Not only did we win the Venom Hackathon, proving our technical prowess, but we also secured a whitelist spot on Venom Wallet and DEX web3.world. And with every new milestone, we get clo…
❤154⚡80👏55🤩25😎3
Listen up, warriors! SpartaCats is no stranger to the grind. ➡️ We’ve methodically built our empire from the ground up, and the results speak for themselves. We’re talking consistent growth — more than 200,000 holders and a whopping 2,000,000 transactions. These aren’t just numbers; they represent a thriving ecosystem that we’ve all contributed to. ➡️ Our banner near SpaceX wasn’t just a marketing stunt — it was a …
❤142⚡93👏83🤩2
Buckle up, gang! Our SpartaCats aren’t just lounging around — they’re blasting off into space to claim their rightful place among the stars! ➡️With over 2,000,000 transactions and more than 200,000 holders backing them, these felines are ready to dominate the galaxy with their $PURR claws. Drop your must-haves for a cosmic takeover in the comments, and let’s lock and load for this wild ride! 🚀 😍Web 💬Chart 🏅DEX 😍W
⚡142❤114🤩65
No words, but #FREEPAVELPURROV 💬
❤135⚡111👏68😎6
Aaand the first 5 winners of our cat-tastic competition are here! We’re thrilled to announce the initial batch of Spartacats who’ve snagged some $PURR! 🤕 We’re still on the prowl for more of your creativity, so keep those comments coming! The next 5 winners are still up for grabs. Congratulations to our current winners: 1. @AoiNwar [transaction link] 2.@Bb10i [transaction link] 3.@dearmrr [transaction link] 4.@Mo…
❤174🤩58⚡54👏43
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @spartacats. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 728,333 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@spartacats named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SpartaCats - News & Updates” (@spartacats), 13,426 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spartacats.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.