2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 65–67 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 21:14
66
no change
11 Aug 2026, 00:46
66
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 31 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 01s
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
58 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
23
39.7%
🔥
19
32.8%
🎉
6
10.3%
🤓
4
6.90%
🌚
2
3.45%
👏
2
3.45%
💯
2
3.45%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2023 to 20 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всем привет!🤍
Долгое время я вела этот канал и он мне дорог, но в какой-то момент стало узко и я стала больше смотреть в сторону стратегии и карьеры.
И создала отдельный канал Лара Марченко Pro стратегию и карьеру. Как-то меня туда ухнуло, завертело, что забыла поделиться тут этой новостью.
И вот, спустя почти 4 месяца до меня дошло!
Что ж, лучше поздно, чем никогда. Приходите. Там более широкая тематика, но темы…
Привет привет!
Вот и заканчиваются НГ праздники.
Ну что? Как прошли ваши праздничные денежки? Готовы к труду? ПИШИТЕ В КОММЕНТАРИЯХ!
Неделя короткая, что позволит войти в режим комфортнее. Ниже поделюсь карточками от Школы Карьерного Менеджмента, где прохожу сейчас обучение. А пока вот видео, которое собрала за эти выходные.
Они были про:
1. Отдых
2. Спорт
3. Постановку целей
4. Красоту природы и шашлык в -25гр
…
Так, у меня дилемма. Мнения разделились и хочу собрать ваши голоса тут, так как выборка достаточная и аудитория проверенная.
ЗАДАЧА (она же просьба 🙏🏻)
Ниже будут два видео. Про вел и про воду. Проголосуйте, пожалуйста, какое видео нравится больше.
Специально не пишу больше для чистоты эксперимента!
И заранее благодарю каждого за участие! ♥️
Что ж, книжки!
Ниже каналы, откуда обычно беру книги в чтение.
80% всего, что я читаю, нахожу у Юзефович (Рыба Лоцман, первая ссылка)!
Но другие два канала тоже проверены временем и бывают крутые находки!
А ПОДЕЛИТЕСЬ СВОИМИ?!😉🙏🏻
https://t.me/ryba_lotsman
https://t.me/biblio_rat
https://t.me/BeAwitness
Я много читаю. Грущу, когда удается читать меньше, чем хочется.
Сейчас в чтении две книги (фото). Обе интересные.
Одна художественная, про людей, любовь, доверие, сложные времена и выборы. Вторая этакий научпоп или литература по саморазвитию, где автор много говорит опять до про DO IT!
Новый год начался со спорта в широком смысле этого слова!💪🏻
Сначала посмотрели фильм Бекхэм (РЕКОМЕНДУЮ), потом начали Le Tour de France (ещё смотрим, но тоже круто).
А сегодня крутила вел и слушала новый выпуск Build Inner Strength* by Huberman Lab with David Goggins (не знала такого, зацепило описание эфира и НЕ ПОЖАЛЕЛА).
Не сотвори себе кумира, поэтому слушала через призму своих ценностей. Но многое оказалось …
🔥7❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @sparklive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кстати, а хотите поделюсь, где я беру книжные рекомендации? PS: все опросы в этом канале анонимны!
Да89%
Нет0%
У меня на такое нет времени!0%
У меня такой список, что я как-то пока воздержусь от новых рекомендаций11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2023 to 20 May 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,128,445 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@sparklive named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@biblio_rat named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Жить с огоньком VS выгорать!🔥” (@sparklive), 66 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sparklive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.