Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Steh Papaiano

Channel

Steh Papaiano

@spapaiano

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,588subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001735867828
TypeChannel
Username@spapaiano
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/spapaiano

Growth

1,5881,6011,594.57 August 2026 — 1,601 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,601 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,599 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,598 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,596 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,593 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,590 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,588 subscribers7 August 202626 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 19 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,586–1,603 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 10:581,588-2
23 Aug 2026, 04:291,590-3
19 Aug 2026, 19:031,593-3
16 Aug 2026, 18:181,596-2
13 Aug 2026, 04:061,598-1
10 Aug 2026, 13:181,599-2
7 Aug 2026, 14:081,601no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:011,601first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 33s
Average length
1m 08s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

494 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍24549.6%
10821.9%
🤬6914.0%
🔥367.29%
😁193.85%
🤝40.81%
🤮40.81%
👏20.405%
🙏20.405%
10.202%
❤‍🔥10.202%
👎10.202%
🖕10.202%
🥰10.202%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 494reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 October 2024 to 14 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Nov 2025, 18:31 UTC≈2,490 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/0TvCpOf8bNM?si=8kLHCfYghhFaTvF3

👍19🙏21🥰1

13 May 2025, 13:35 UTC≈2,290 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/Do3nA6SP6L8?si=TOS4P2EiZ2ytgstz

🔥184🖕1

2 May 2025, 21:10 UTC≈2,300 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Pessoal, em breve nosso querido Marco Antônio Costa estará debatendo no RedCast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2MKUA-jSUk

👍171👎1

30 Apr 2025, 00:16 UTC≈1,930 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Psolento briga com a realidade sem medo de ser feliz! O vereador Toninho Vespoli agrediu o Rubinho Nunes com uma faixa e tá chorando que o agredido foi ele!!! Parece brincadeira, mas não é…

👍366🔥3

5 Apr 2025, 14:52 UTC≈1,790 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026

O novo padrão do Brasil é composto por uma parcela de pessoas que aplaude o que desconhece. Aplaudem censura, sem saber que ela pode virar contra eles. Aplaudem o STF, sem entender o que é o devido processo legal. Aplaudem a perseguição política, achando que é justiça. Aplaudem o abuso de autoridade, enquanto se vendem por migalhas de narrativa. Vivemos tempos em que a ausência de princípios virou estilo de vida, o

👍369👏21🔥1

3 Apr 2025, 22:15 UTC≈1,210 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://youtube.com/live/KQ1cMOhPfkM?feature=share Daqui a pouco estarei no BradockShow

👍215🔥2

13 Jan 2025, 20:51 UTC≈1,910 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rubinhonunesPhoto

A ameaça do DREX: por que com a fiscalização do Pix, o fim do dinheiro físico coloca nossa liberdade em risco, clique no link da thread: https://x.com/rubinhonunes/status/1878907129186463774?s=46

🤬24👍1

11 Jan 2025, 13:59 UTC≈1,790 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rubinhonunesVideo

Alguém sabe se o Lula já se manifestou sobre o amigo ditador? Afinal, a “comitiva do PT” teve cadeira cativa na posse fraudulenta de Nicolás Maduro. Randolfe Rodrigues, líder do governo, chamou essa mesma posse de “ilegítima e farsante” mas claro, só para gerar manchete. E o Felipe Neto, vai cobrar agora? Durante a campanha, ele jurou que o Lula não era aliado de ditaduras. No fim, tudo não passou de estelionato el

🤬17

5 Jan 2025, 17:10 UTC≈1,630 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rubinhonunesPhoto

O descondenado está articulando uma estratégia política agressiva para enfraquecer a oposição conservadora no Senado, buscando consolidar poder e impedir o avanço da oposição. Segue o link para entender 🧶👇🏼 https://x.com/rubinhonunes/status/1875952111126786192?s=46

👍20🔥2

31 Dec 2024, 18:08 UTC≈1,640 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Retrospectiva do desastre do governo Lula: https://x.com/rubinhonunes/status/1874150403161678028?s=46

🔥10

15 Dec 2024, 15:55 UTC≈2,040 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Se não fosse suficiente toda desgraça petista, vamos financiar uma universidade para o Foro de SP sendo custeada pela Itaipu: https://x.com/rubinhonunes/status/1868319475348742470?s=46

🤬28🤮4

11 Dec 2024, 22:28 UTC≈2,140 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Não entendi: https://x.com/steh_papaiano/status/1866972925037007122?s=46

😁9👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @spapaiano. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 176,721 of 1,624,174entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Steh Papaiano” (@spapaiano), 1,588 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spapaiano.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.