Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

اخبار و اطلاعات نجومی

@spaceinfo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,143subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001009248098
TypeChannel
Username@spaceinfo
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/spaceinfo

Growth

1,1371,1431,1406 August 2026 — 1,137 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,137 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,139 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,143 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,136–1,144 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:151,143+4
10 Aug 2026, 01:111,139+2
6 Aug 2026, 14:411,137no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:371,137first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.8%
avg views ÷ 1,143 subscribers
Avg views / post
135
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held11 (26 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,488
Reactions total20
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1155.0%
👍525.0%
🤬210.0%
🤯210.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC64 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

من دیگر از #ایستگاه_فضایی @Space_Station تایم‌لپس‌های نورهای شمالی را منتشر نمی‌کنم. . . چون خسته‌ام از نگاه کردن به آن‌ها. . . پس اساساً هرگز! نمایشی دیگر از این پدیده فراموش نشدنی که شب گذشته زیر پای ما رقصید، این یکی حتی خاص‌تر بود زیرا با @astro_anil به اشتراک گذاشته شد، در حالی که او برای اولین بار آن را با چنین شدتی مشاهده می‌کرد. طول‌موج‌های قرمز (در بالای سبز) در این گذر به‌ویژه درخشان بودند. I‘ll stop pos

1

5 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC67 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔷️ رشد سریع بخش فضایی تجاری چین 🔹️گزارش جدید مرکز مطالعات استراتژیک و بین‌المللی (CSIS) با عنوان «مدارهای مبهم» به بررسی گسترش سریع صنعت فضایی تجاری چین پرداخته است. بر اساس این گزارش، از سال ۲۰۱۴ که پکن بخش‌هایی از صنعت فضایی خود را به روی سرمایه‌گذاری خصوصی باز کرد، تعداد شرکت‌های فعال در این حوزه از کمتر از ده شرکت به حدود ۶۰۰ شرکت رسیده است. 🔹️شرکت‌های چینی در حال توسعه موشک‌های قابل استفاده مجدد، منظومه‌های ما

👍1

4 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC90 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

یک روز در هر #سیاره چقدر طول می‌کشد How fast does a #day pass on each #planet 🆔 @spaceinfo 🌍

1

4 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC85 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

#SpaceX #Starship #landing 🆔 @spaceinfo ✨🚀

1

2 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC121 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔷 میرا، چشم فضایی آمریکا 🔹 نیروی‌هوایی ایالات متحده قراردادی به ارزش ۲۷٫۷۷ میلیون دلاری با شرکت «Impulse Space» جهت خرید دو ماهوارهٔ مانورپذیر دیگر از نوع «میرا» را برای تقویت توانایی‌های نظارت و ردیابی تهدیدات در مدار نزدیک‌زمین امضا کرد. 🔹ماهوارهٔ «میرا» یک ماهواره مانورپذیر است که می‌تواند محموله‌هایی تا ۳۰۰ کیلوگرم را در مدارهای نزدیک‌زمین، متوسط و زمین‌ثابت جابه‌جا کند. میرا با بهره‌گیری از ۸ پیشران، قابلیت تغ

29 Jul 2026, 16:15 UTC184 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

#شفق_قطبی در آسمان شب #نروژ #Aurora Borealis in #Norway.😍 🆔 @spaceinfo 🌌

4

29 Jul 2026, 16:14 UTC180 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

❇️پرونده‌های تازهٔ یوفو، پرسش‌های تازه را برانگیخته است 🛸 تصاویر و فیلم‌های تازه‌منتشرشده از پدیده‌های هوایی ناشناس (UAP) که اخیراً در دسترس عموم قرار گرفته، نشان‌دهندهٔ اجرام عجیبی در آسمان است که حرکات غیرعادی از خود نشان می‌دهند؛ از تغییر شکل ناگهانی گرفته تا چرخش‌های سریع و غیرقابل‌پیش‌بینی. اما یک نکتهٔ کلیدی وجود دارد: این تصاویر هنوز وجود حیات فرازمینی را تأیید نمی‌کنند. این اجرام همچنان «ناشناس» باقی مانده‌

🤯2👍1

29 Jul 2026, 16:14 UTC135 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ویدیوهای با کیفیت منتشر شده توسط #ناسا از مجموعه ماموریت های #آپولو و فرآیند فرود و ماه پیمایی فضانوردان در دهه ۶٠ و ۷٠ میلادی #moon #apolo #nasa 🆔 @spaceinfo 👌

1👍1

28 Jul 2026, 19:28 UTC186 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

دو تصویر از بوستر #سوپرهووی و فضاپیمای #استارشیپ #اسپیس_ایکس در ماموریت اخیر آن (Flight 13) در مدار زمین Starship in space on Flight 13 🆔 @spaceinfo 🚀

2👍1

28 Jul 2026, 19:21 UTC178 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

نمایی از آسمان شب در #مریخ ۱۴۰ میلیون مایل دورتر از ما! 🌍🪐 🆔 @spaceinfo 🚀

1

26 Jul 2026, 17:02 UTC198 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @partisan2015Photo

🔶 محور شرارت و شریک شرارت! (۲) 🇮🇷🇨🇳 🔸 هم زمان با شرکت MizarVision چین، که به علت انتشار آرایش تسلیحاتی آمریکا در خاورمیانه در زمان جنگ با ایران تحت تحریم ایالات متحده قرار گرفت و این موضوع را به عنوان افتخار عنوان کرد: اینجا بخوانید. یک شرکت بسیار مطرح و بزرگ‌تر چین نیز تحت تحریم قرار گرفت. 🔸 شرکت فضایی مطرح Changguang Satellite Technology تحت هدایت آکادمی علوم چین (CAS) که مالک منظومه بزرگ ماهواره‌ای Jilin-1 است؛

🤬2👍1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @spaceinfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اخبار و اطلاعات نجومی” (@spaceinfo), 1,143 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spaceinfo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.