Channel
@spaceconfff
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
14subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001961709422 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @spaceconfff |
| Description | сейфплейс для людей с гиперфиксацией/пермафиксацией/спец интересом и просто увлекающихся астрономией! кр qivviiii on twi |
| Created | 18 March 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/spaceconfff |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 14 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:00 | 14 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 27 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
140 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 22.9% | |
| 😨 | 25 | 17.9% | |
| 😢 | 18 | 12.9% | |
| 🤔 | 17 | 12.1% | |
| 💋 | 16 | 11.4% | |
| 💘 | 13 | 9.29% | |
| 🍓 | 12 | 8.57% | |
| 💅 | 3 | 2.14% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 2.14% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.714% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 140reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2023 to 25 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 10 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 17 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 30 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Channel photo removed
возможное тв слова модера мафа: всех очень любим цемаем не унывайте улыбайтесь чаще и не обвиняйте Израиль в терроризме
💋15🤔4🍓1😨1
я всех очень люблю это по личным причинам еще раз простите
💘13😢3❤1
простите что запутал это не на первое апреля
🤔11😢7
Channel name was changed to «[закрыто] space confessions!!🪄🫧»
в общем кф закрывается /срз спасибо что были с нами искр всем удачи и счастья радости
😨24😢5🤔1
💤 апрель и аутизм: что к чему? как вы уже знаете или узнали недавно, месяц видимости аутичных людей проходит в апреле, начиная со второго числа. но, к сожалению, ещё не все осведомлены о том, что из себя представляет аутизм, какова его история и какие существуют подводные камни в некоторых продвигаемых акциях. сегодня я кратко расскажу вам о том, что такое «light it up blue», и почему это НЕ стоит поддерживать. вп…
❤11🕊1
новый тейк! (щп?)🌔 я намемасил сматрите в конце и в начале лучше на паузу поставьте неанон дейв🍃 @spaceconfff
🍓10❤2🤔1
Channel name was changed to «[рест] space confessions!!🪄🫧»
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @spaceconfff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@spaceconfff named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[закрыто] space confessions!!🪄🫧” (@spaceconfff), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spaceconfff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.