Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Silverize

@sp8blueprint

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

18subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003798927793
TypeChannel
Username@sp8blueprint
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 22 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sp8blueprint

Growth

171817.57 August 2026 — 17 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17–18 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:5318+1
11 Aug 2026, 20:1517no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:3217first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 22 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
50.0%
avg views ÷ 18 subscribers
Avg views / post
9.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held10 (22 April 202611 August 2026)
Views total18
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC7 viewsread 11 August 2026

5 приседаний 5 прыжков 5 раз покрутись вокруг себя перешли это сообщение 20 друзьям и на утро я у тебя в кровати

22 Apr 2026, 15:48 UTC704 viewsread 11 August 2026

⭐⭐🤩🤩 𝐬𝐢𝐥𝐯𝒆𝐫🤩 𝒄𝒊𝒔-𝒎𝒂𝒏 ⭐⭐ 🥹 🤩 𝐒𝐏𝟖 𝒃𝒓𝒖𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒚 🥹 ⭐ 🤩 𝐚𝐧𝐝 😻 𝒉𝒆/𝒉𝒊𝒎 😻 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐲 . .

22 Apr 2026, 15:48 UTC777 viewsread 11 August 2026

🎀😻🤩🤩ᅠ ֺ 𝐭𝐲𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐢𝐞𝐬ᅠ😻➰ 🎀🖼😻𝐬𝐩/𝐬𝐱𝟖 (𝑠𝑝𝟒𝑠𝑥𝟔) 𝑠𝑙𝑒 ֺ ┊ᅠ𝐕𝐅𝐄𝐋⁴⁴⁴¹ 🎀🎀⏝︶ 𝐴𝑆𝐸𝐹🤩𝑝ℎ𝑙𝑒𝑔-𝑐ℎ𝑜𝑙ᅠ◟ 𝒏𝒃𝒑𝒗 🎀🎀⛔️ᅠ𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑐-𝑛𝑒𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑙 ︶⏝

22 Apr 2026, 15:48 UTC775 viewsread 11 August 2026

🎀 ⎯ׅ⎯ 🤩 ִ𝐚𝐧𝐨𝐧 𓏺𓏺𓏺 𝔀𝓸𝓻𝓴 🎀 🤩🎀︵✨ ︎︎ ︎ ︎︎𝓼𝐡𝐢𝐭︎𝒑𝐨𝐬𝐭 ︎ ︎┆︎ ︎︎ ︵‌ ִ۫

22 Apr 2026, 15:48 UTC917 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

⭐⭐𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐭𝐨 𝐦𝐞?

  1. ⭐✅ 𝐟𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐝23%
  2. ⭐✍️ 𝐚𝐜𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞7%
  3. ⭐ ✨ 𝐟𝐚𝐧24%
  4. ⭐❓ 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐫46%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @sp8blueprint. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Apr 2026, 15:48 UTCAnonymous Poll111 voters

⭐⭐𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐭𝐨 𝐦𝐞?

  1. ⭐✅ 𝐟𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐝23%
  2. ⭐✍️ 𝐚𝐜𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞7%
  3. ⭐ ✨ 𝐟𝐚𝐧24%
  4. ⭐❓ 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐫46%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Silverize” (@sp8blueprint), 18 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sp8blueprint.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.