8 measurements spanning 7 days, net +154. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54,579–54,789 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 15:27
54,765
+9
12 Aug 2026, 12:15
54,756
+30
11 Aug 2026, 11:31
54,726
+48
10 Aug 2026, 09:53
54,678
+75
9 Aug 2026, 09:11
54,603
-13
8 Aug 2026, 09:01
54,616
+5
6 Aug 2026, 10:00
54,611
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:56
54,611
first reading
Engagement
71 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.58%
avg views ÷ 54,765 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,510
71 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
71
of 71 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
71 (3 August 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
178,120
Reactions total
5,881
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,140
Videos
≈3,460
Links
≈3,340
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 32m
Average length
6m 38s
Measured directly from 32 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,881 reactions across 71 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,331
39.6%
🔥
1,737
29.5%
❤
1,361
23.1%
💯
238
4.05%
👏
89
1.51%
🙈
44
0.748%
🥰
22
0.374%
🤯
15
0.255%
🤗
14
0.238%
⚡
11
0.187%
😢
10
0.17%
🤩
5
0.085%
🙏
3
0.051%
😍
1
0.017%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,881reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❗ ОООЧЕНЬ ВАЖНОЕ ВИДЕО❗
НЕ ЗАНИМАЙТЕСЬ САМООБМАНОМ И АВТОГИПНОЗОМ 😡🙈🥶
САМОЗВАНЦЫ И ПАРАЗИТЫ ИСЧЕЗНУТ из нашей жизни, когда вы начнёте говорить ПРАВДУ 🔥
Называйте вещи своими именами! 💥
ПРАВДА - важнее всего сегодня! ✊
10 понятий, которые важно чётко и правильно называть вслух при общении с работниками всех юрлиц.
И всегда обязательно под видеопротокол!
✅ Уведомление в "ЦИК РФ" об аннулиованиии всех результатов ком…
Честь дороже денег ✊
🧡🧡🧡🧡 🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡
Песня
«Я НЕ ПРОДАЮСЬ»
(2026г.)
Авторы здесь.
Создано с помощью ИИ.
Аудио- или видеоряд был изменен или полностью сгенерирован.
#песни
🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡
🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡
О ЖИЗНИ ❤️
Босиком.
Хорошо по лужицам
Бегать босиком.
Брызги разлетаются
Мокрые кругом.
Сердятся прохожие,
Машут вслед рукой.
Мы бежим веселою
Дружною гурьбой.
Солнце улыбается
Вместе с ветерком,
Хорошо по лужицам
Бегать босиком.
#великиеслова
#читаемстихи
#ктосомной
#совет_родителей_рекомендует
🧡🧡🧡
🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡
🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡 ✨
Редкое издание 👍
Россия Полное географическое описание Нашего Отечества.
Том 7
Малороссия. 1908г.
П.П.Семенов.
✅ Создайте свой профиль на бусти, чтобы сохранять все материалы.
✅ Подпишитесь на канал
✅ Сохраняйте, изучайте, читайте 🧡
#жаннагорбачева
#читаемкниги
#ктосомной
#ктоеслинемы
ДОРОГИЕ МАМЫ И ПАПЫ ✊
Ищите старые словари, этот 1949 года 🤓
Как вы думаете зачем они меняют смыслы слов, некоторые заставляют нас забыть, а на новые с новыми смыслами прямо вводят моду 😡
Делаем выводы ✊✊✊
#ктоеслинемы
Разве НАСТОЯЩИЕ врачи
требовали бы с людей подписи "ДОБРОВОЛЬНОГО согласия на медУСЛУГИ" с перекладыванием НА ВАС всей ответственности за их непрофессионализм и вызывали бы "охрану" на человека, пришедшего с вопросами?
12.08.2026
"Стоматологическая поликлиника 20", СПб
"глав.врач" Голинский Ю.Г.
Поданы
✅ Отзыв "согласия на ОПД".
✅ Уведомления об отзыве "ИДС" (Информированного ДОБРОВОЛЬНОГО СОГЛАСИЯ).
✅ Манифест о Зе…
Мы - дети твои,
Дорогая Земля! 🙏
🧡🧡🧡🧡 🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡
Песня
«Притяженье Земли»
(1978г.)
Исполнитель: Лев Лещенко.
Музыка: Давид Тухманов,
Слова: Роберт Рождественский.
Песня написана к
д/ф «Обычный космос» (1978г.)
На видео фрагмент программы
"Песня - 78. Финал"
#песни
🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡
🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡
О ЖИЗНИ 🌾
Август.
Сонет.
Как ясен август, нежный и спокойный,
Сознавший мимолетность красоты.
Позолотив древесные листы,
Он чувства заключил в порядок стройный.
В нём кажется ошибкой полдень знойный,-
С ним больше сродны грустные мечты,
Прохлада, прелесть тихой простоты
И отдыха от жизни беспокойной.
В последний раз, пред острием серпа,
Красуются колосья наливные,
Взамен цветов везде плоды земные.
…
🧡🧡🧡
🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡
🧡🧡🧡🧡🧡 ✨
Читаем всей семьёй ❤️
Полное географическое описание нашего отечества
Том 2, средне-русская черноземная область.
1902г.
✅ Создайте свой профиль на бусти, чтобы сохранять все материалы.
✅ Подпишитесь на канал
✅ Сохраняйте учебники и ЗАНИМАЙТЕСЬ по НАСТОЯЩИМ учебникам со своими детьми!
#жаннагорбачева
#читаемкниги
#ктосомной
#ктоеслинемы
НЕ ВРИТЕ СЕБЕ и не позволяйте другим вам врать.
Какой правовой строй на рынке? Разберитесь и действуйте ✊
Полное видео здесь
Изучите обязательно 👇
🧡 ОФЕРТА И АКЦЕПТ 🔥
Наши чаты для обучения 👇
🔅Закрытый чат для Родителей
✉️ Чат по теме Вексель
🔑ЧАТ Закон и ЖКХ 🔥
📌Чат "60-65+ ОБУЧЕНИЕ"
🤩 Чат "Лучшие из Лучших!"
📱ПРАВОВАЯ РОДИТЕЛЬСКАЯ АКАДЕМИЯ на Бусти
📱 Телеграмм канал
#жаннагорбачева
#ктосомной
#ктоеслинемы
👍52🔥14❤7💯7🤗2🙈2⚡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @sovrodrussia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@sovrodrussia edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 116,602 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ROD.SOVET.RUSSIA ОСНОВНОЙ КАНАЛ В ТЕЛЕГРАММ ✊️” (@sovrodrussia), 54,765 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sovrodrussia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.