Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Современница | учит язык(ам) 💮

Channel

Современница | учит язык(ам) 💮

@sovremennica_study

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

229subscribers

+97 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002159082283
TypeChannel
Username@sovremennica_study
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sovremennica_study

Growth

132229180.57 August 2026 — 132 subscribers9 August 2026 — 132 subscribers16 August 2026 — 208 subscribers25 August 2026 — 229 subscribers7 August 202625 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +97. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 117–244 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 00:38229+21
16 Aug 2026, 19:34208+76
9 Aug 2026, 00:45132no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:17132first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 1 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.7%
avg views ÷ 229 subscribers
Avg views / post
38.2
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
19.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (1 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total344
Reactions total67
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 00:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
35s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

122 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6049.2%
🔥3528.7%
🥰97.38%
❤‍🔥54.10%
💯54.10%
🤣32.46%
👌21.64%
10.82%
👏10.82%
😁10.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC19 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

В качестве примера употребления for в значении "потому что" — отрывок из Винни Пуха. Читаю его с учениками периодически и он совершенно не так прост, каким все его помнят. С точки зрения языка как минимум. Напишу когда-нибудь потом полноценный пост про эту книгу. Есть о чем подумать и рассказать 🤩 By and by Piglet woke up. As soon as he woke he said to himself, "Oh!" Then he said bravely, "Yes," and then, still more

4🥰2🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC20 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Помимо довольно важного, хотя и базовичкового вопроса, в этом видео хороши и конструкции Are you climbing a mountain for the world to see you or for you to see the world? "Ты совершаешь восхождение на гору, чтобы мир увидел тебя или чтобы ты увидел мир?" Очередной пример того, что порядок слов мы не просто так проходим и того, что английский все же принадлежит германской группе Т.к. в английском превалирует прямой

🔥4👌1

6 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC25 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я снова с хвастом! Мой ученик-подросток получил задание посмотреть видео о творчестве Вирджинии Вульф (что для его возраста уже, честно говоря, нифига себе) и по этому видео написать эссе с пересказом и собственными мыслями на тему. И. Вы. Только. Посмотрите. На это. Роскошество. Размышления, подбор лексики и размер написанного — на высоком уровне. Очевидно, что особенно сложные слова взяты из видео, но отчасти в э

5🔥2🥰1

4 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC37 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Постепенно читаю "Лето с Гомером" и параллельно случайно наткнулась на канал, посвященный Гомеру В своих видео парень читает отрывок из Илиады на английском, потом аккомпанирует себе, играя на арфе?, читает отрывок на древнегреческом и анализирует прочитанное. супер-нишево, у этого по 30 просмотров на видео, но это совершенно точно искусство по крайне мере искусство проводить время с пользой для собственной души

4👌1🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC46 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Посоветовала ученице сериал "New Girl", который сама недавно посмотрела целиком за неделю И она его смотрит! Что, во-первых, радует меня просто как человека, чей вкус признают, а во-вторых, это дало нам почву для тренировки говорения. Девушка записывала мне голосовые о своих впечатлениях на английском и, конечно же, мы поболтали о сериале и на самом уроке) На скрине еще можно увидеть интересный лингвистический приё

5🔥3👏1

1 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC47 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

А еще я жестко угарела с надписи на местной аптеке Вообще она pharmacy, но одна буква не горит и так аптека превратилась во вреднеку 😇

6🤣3🔥2

1 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC48 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Недавно я ездила в отпуск в Грузию и вот что выяснила: 🌟дождь в горах — непередаваемый опыт, который хочется пожелать каждому (но в безопасных условиях, конечно) 🌟дыня со вкусом дынных сладостей правда существует 🌟грузины не боятся опасностей 🌟я очень люблю море, даже просто смотреть на него 🌟грузинское мороженое очень вкусное, но дорогое 🌟иногда природа заставляет спрятать камеру и прожить момент единения с ней 🌟вы

🔥64🥰2

31 Jul 2026, 08:59 UTC53 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Talent is a pursuit interest Талант — заинтересованность в достижении цели 🌟Случайные выражения со словом interest, потому что я могу: Interest rate — процентная ставка Pay interest — выплачивать проценты Person of interest — подозреваемый Be of interest = be interesting Еще он использует интересное сленговое выражение: it's a baloney (bologna) — полная ерунда

4

30 Jul 2026, 21:43 UTC49 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ну держитесь😈 Я сегодня написала аж 10 постов... Надеюсь, вам будет интересно😌

💯5

29 Jul 2026, 11:58 UTC62 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Иногда я придумываю себе испытания и сама от них немного страдаю Вернулись с одним из учеников к работе с книжкой по техно-английскому Считаю, полезно, в целом Но учебник 2007 года... (если у вас есть что-то новее, поделитесь, пожалуйста) Многое понятно, но внутренне морально страдаю ахах Очень много специфических терминов — спасибо папе-программисту, вывожу, но без гугла уроки не проводятся И во время подготовки,

3

19 Jul 2026, 22:34 UTC87 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Как мне, ребята, было всегда плевать на футбол, но! ¡España es campeona del mundo! 🇪🇸 ¡Felicidades!

8🔥3🥰1

30 Jun 2026, 15:59 UTC113 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Читаю "Берлин и окрестности", в одной из статей Рот пишет о слове небоскрёб. По описанию стало очевидно, что либо в немецком дом тоже скребёт небо, либо переводчик гений, и я пошла проверять. И действительно: 🥭 Нем. Wolkenkratzer (облака+тот, кто скребёт) 🍸Англ. Skyscraper (небо+тот, кто скребёт) 🤩 Исп. Rascacielos (чесать+небо) 🪼 Шв. Skyskrapa (небо+скрести) По словарю Фасмера, русское слово небоскрёб является кал

6🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @sovremennica_study. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 456,657 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Современница | учит язык(ам) 💮” (@sovremennica_study), 229 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sovremennica_study.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.