Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

⸼࣪ 𓍢𓍢 ❬☾❭𝗦𝐨𝒯𝐭𝐞𝐫︩︪𝒮𝐢𝐬་༘࿐ | 𝐋𝐈𝐅𝐄

@sotterlis_Life

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

263subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003880018533
TypeChannel
Username@sotterlis_Life
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sotterlis_Life

Growth

260263261.58 Aug 2026, 08:35 — 260 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:05 — 260 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 02:55 — 263 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:359 Aug 2026, 02:55
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 260–263 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 02:55263+3
8 Aug 2026, 09:05260no change
8 Aug 2026, 08:35260first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.2%
avg views ÷ 263 subscribers
Avg views / post
34.7
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (7 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total694
Reactions total24
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

24 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5373225166442635049729.2%
custom 5372870573942674618520.8%
custom 5215604071452416438416.7%
custom 5217446032601815465312.5%
custom 519540906650714816728.33%
custom 527411901083579936528.33%
custom 523340176309200965014.17%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sotterlis_Life. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC22 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✦ ✿॒࣪0️⃣𝐔𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐃𝐀𝐘 ❞ㅤᩬֺֺ . ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ 🤩Ежедневно мы общаемся с вами и вежливо болтаем, но вновь мы с радостью заводим с вами большой разговор. Мы задаём вам вопрос.... ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ ೋ« ○✯◦»ೋ ┅┅┅┅┅┅┅┓ ℰжедневный вопрос ╭┈๋જ‌› Если бы вы могли прожить один день жизнью любого человека из этого чата, кого бы вы выбрали и почему? ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ #𝙧𝙪𝙗𝙧𝙞𝙘_𝙎𝙍𝙇

8 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC24 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩 𝂅ׄ ִྀི ⚡️𝐎𝐎𝐃 𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐍𝐈𝐍𝐆✶ ִ ૢ ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ 🤩 Луна садится и ночь заменяется на утро. Подарив вам тепла и хорошего настроения, но в утрате мы желаем всем доброго утра.. ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ ೋ« ○✯◦»ೋ ┅┅┅┅┅┅┅┓ 𝒟оброе утро, кроме тех ╭┈๋જ‌› У кого есть музыкальный инструмент ╭┈๋જ‌› У кого сложный характер ╭┈๋જ‌› Кто любит белый шоколад ╰───────────────╯ 🐾 - ура, доброе утро 🎁 - без доброго утра

custom 53728705739426746182custom 53732251664426350492

7 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC40 views6 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

✦ ᤳ𝅄۫ 𝆤𝑵𝑬𝑾 𝑼𝑵𝑰𝑶𝑵𝆤 𓈒۫ ⊹ 𝅄 ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ 𝒟ружеские нити соединили узы между ⸼࣪ 𓍢𓍢 ❬☾❭𝗦𝐨𝒯𝐭𝐞𝐫︩︪𝒮𝐢𝐬་༘࿐ и 𐙚 . ℱ𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘭 𝘓𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 !! ₊ 𑁭ᰍ , мы надеемся что наши нити никогда не разорвуться. И мы останемся навсегда друзьями.. ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ⁞⁞᜴ֵ۫ ׁ𝅄 ॒ 𝒞егодня мы заключили дружеский союз с 𐙚 . ℱ𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘭 𝘓𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 !! ₊ 𑁭ᰍ ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ 𝙄𝙉𝙁𝙊 | 𝙇𝙄𝙁𝙀 𝂅ׄ ִྀི 𝙏𝙍𝘼𝘾𝙆𝙀𝙍: @sieyys ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ #𝙪𝙣𝙞𝙤𝙣_𝙎𝙍𝙇

custom 53732251664426350492custom 52156040714524164381custom 52174460326018154651custom 52334017630920096501custom 52741190108357993651

7 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC38 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✦ ᤳ𝅄۫ 𝆤𝑵𝑬𝑾 𝑼𝑵𝑰𝑶𝑵🤩𝆤 𓈒۫ ⊹ 𝅄 ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ 𝒟ружеские нити соединили узы между ⸼࣪ 𓍢𓍢 ❬☾❭𝗦𝐨𝒯𝐭𝐞𝐫︩︪𝒮𝐢𝐬་༘࿐ и 𝐒𝐇𝐀𝐑𝐃 𝐄𝐂𝐋𝐈𝐏𝐒𝐄, мы надеемся что наши нити никогда не разорвуться. И мы останемся навсегда друзьями.. ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ⁞⁞᜴ֵ۫ ׁ𝅄 ॒ 𝒞егодня мы заключили дружеский союз с 𝐒𝐇𝐀𝐑𝐃 𝐄𝐂𝐋𝐈𝐏𝐒𝐄 ⎯⎯⎯⎯ 𝙄𝙉𝙁𝙊 | 𝙇𝙄𝙁𝙀 𝂅ׄ ִྀི 𝙏𝙍𝘼𝘾𝙆𝙀𝙍: @Shecunions_bot ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ #𝙪𝙣𝙞𝙤𝙣_𝙎𝙍𝙇

custom 52156040714524164381custom 53732251664426350491

7 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC36 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✦ ᤳ𝅄۫ 𝆤𝑵𝑬𝑾 𝑼𝑵𝑰𝑶𝑵🤩𝆤 𓈒۫ ⊹ 𝅄 ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ 𝒟ружеские нити соединили узы между ⸼࣪ 𓍢𓍢 ❬☾❭𝗦𝐨𝒯𝐭𝐞𝐫︩︪𝒮𝐢𝐬་༘࿐ и 𝓑.𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝓡.𝗮𝘆𝘀, мы надеемся что наши нити никогда не разорвуться. И мы останемся навсегда друзьями.. ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ⁞⁞᜴ֵ۫ ׁ𝅄 ॒ 𝒞егодня мы заключили дружеский союз с 𝓑.𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝓡.𝗮𝘆𝘀 ⎯⎯⎯⎯ 𝙄𝙉𝙁𝙊 | 𝙇𝙄𝙁𝙀 𝂅ׄ ִྀི 𝙏𝙍𝘼𝘾𝙆𝙀𝙍: @Bright_Rays_Bot ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ #𝙪𝙣𝙞𝙤𝙣_𝙎𝙍𝙇

custom 52156040714524164381custom 52174460326018154651custom 52741190108357993651

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sotterlis_Life. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 39,319 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 46 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

[РЕСТ] 𝑀𝑶𝑅𝑇𝑨𝐿 𝑆𝑶𝑈𝑳𝑆 | ʟɪғᴇ
@MSlliff · 50
2 posts
союзы астрея
@astreaunions · 13
1 post
UNIONS / 𝐵𝑒𝓁𝓁𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓃𝓃𝒶 𝒻𝓁𝑜𝑜𝒹
@BELLADONNAUNION · 11
1 post
закрыто 𝙀𝙥𖦹𝙘𝙝 𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙡𝙞𝙛𝙚 ݁ ˖
@blafardl · 124
1 post
uniᴏns Ᏼlᴏdig Ꮀörlusᴛ
@blodig_forlust_unions · 8
1 post
[ 𝐍𝐄𝐖 𝐄𝐑𝐀 ] 𝔩𝔦𝔣𝔢 | . . ♟️ 𝔇𝔲𝔰𝔱ℬℴ𝔯𝔫ℯ 𝔇𝔬𝔏𝔏ℌ𝔬𝔘𝔰ℯ.
@DD_life · 104
1 post
𓆩 𝕺𝐄𝕷𝖀𝐆𝐄 𝕷𝐈𝐅𝐄 𓆪
@DELUGE_life · 277
1 post
𓆩𝕺𝐄𝕷𝖀𝐆𝐄 𝖀𝐍𝐈𝕺𝐍𝐒𓆪
@DELUGE_union · 6
1 post
[ CLOSE ] 𝗱𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗺𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗻 | 𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗲
@dreamshen_life · 39
1 post
◖ ᗪᑌᗩᒪ ⌠🪙⌡ SIGᕼT ◗ˡⁱᶠᵉ
@DUAL_SIGHT_lif3 · 118
1 post
«𝐄𝐃𝐄𝐋𝐖𝐄𝐈𝐒𝐒 . . 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨
@edelw_rp · 330
1 post
𝐔.ۨ𝐍ۧ𝐈ۜ𝐎𝐍۪𝐒 𝐄.ۨ𝐕ۧ𝐎ۜ𝐈𝐑۪𝐄
@evorAMOR · 13
1 post
⺀𝗚𝖠𐌑𝖫𝗘 .. 𝘜𝘕𝘐𝘖𝘕 𝘋𝘖𝘙𝘐
@GM_shalunstvoTypeBit · 3
1 post
⇊︎𝘏𝘺𝘴𝘪𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘴 / 𝘜𝘯𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴
@HysilensUnions · 2
1 post
・⁺◦ 𝐿𝓊𝓁𝓊 𝐿𝒶𝓃𝒹 ·˚・ |𝒰𝓃𝒾𝑜𝓃𝓈
@LLunions · 13
1 post
ₘᵢₖᵤ ᵤₙᵢₒₙₛ 𔗂꯭ֺ 𝕮𝐡ɑׁׅ𔓕‌ִꑄ ִ𝆹𝅥 𓈒𝐒𝕔𝖗ꪱׁׁׁׅׅׅᏢɨ ۫𝆬⃝ ִֺ𝅄𝆹ִֺ𝅥ৎ
@MikunionsCS · 2
1 post
Союзы 𝘖𝘔𝘚.
@ominousunions · 1
1 post
𝒩.𝑒𝑤 𝑒𝑟𝑎 | 𝑃𝑒︩︪𝑎𝑟𝑙 ¡ 𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘦
@Pl_lI1 · 386
1 post
𝐿𝑖𝑓𝑒 — 𝐐-𝐒𝐈𝐍𝐆𝐔𝐋𝐀𝐑𝐈𝐒 𖥔 ݁ ˖
@QSingularis_Life · 135
1 post
𐌡ᥙᥴᴛ 𑀝᧐юᤋнᥙκ᧐ʙ
@SPsheet · 16
1 post
Unions Aventurine #𝔰𝘯𝚝
@union_Aventurine · 4
1 post
﹫ A‌ָ࣪𝗡:ꓷ֕𝐄 ⃟🌺 𝗠ָ࣪𝖠𝖫𝖨֕𝖭ℰ𝖫‌𝖫𝖤 ❜ : 𝐔𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗌
@unions_AML · 5
1 post
𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐓 𝐎𝐅 𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒
@unions_thoma · 3
1 post
𝗕𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗛𝗮𝘃𝗲𝗻|𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀
@unionsBH · 2
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⸼࣪ 𓍢𓍢 ❬☾❭𝗦𝐨𝒯𝐭𝐞𝐫︩︪𝒮𝐢𝐬་༘࿐ | 𝐋𝐈𝐅𝐄” (@sotterlis_Life), 263 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sotterlis_Life.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.