输入 <think> 会泄漏隐私?DeepSeek 官方出来“辟谣”了! 大伙儿最近听说了吗?有人在 DeepSeek 里敲入 <think>,结果模型胡言乱语,甚至让人怀疑是不是别人家的聊天记录“串台”泄露了。 别慌!DeepSeek 官方刚刚发文解释了:这只是一个误会。 简单来说,这其实是特殊字符触发了模型的“幻觉”。就像人类有时候看到某个奇怪的符号会突然“出神、胡思乱想”一样,AI 被 <think> 这个词给整迷糊了,开始瞎编内容,根本不是什么隐私泄露,大家的聊天记录都安全着呢! DeepSeek 官方也表示,技术哥哥们已经在加班了,后续会通过针对性训练,教 AI 认清这些特殊字符,把这个 Bug 修复掉。大家可以继续放心调戏 AI 啦!

Channel
So 波场能量租凭服务
@sotrxv
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
18subscribers
-459 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002706701757 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sotrxv |
| Created | 14 June 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sotrxv |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Oct 2026, 07:41 | 18 | -2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:18 | 20 | -4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 24 | -5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 29 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 33 | -444 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 477 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 477 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 14 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
14 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 4 | 28.6% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 21.4% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 14.3% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2025 to 20 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
1 TRX 到底能换多少能量?这个问题我问了十个人,十个人都答错了。🎁 多数人背得出固定数字。错。链上没有官方牌价。 total_energy_limit 和 total_energy_weight 每分钟都在重写汇率。 真实的算法是: 能量 = 质押量 × (总能量上限 / 总质押权重) 这个比值就是隐性的能量汇率。它越稀释,租赁市场越贵。⚡️
👍1👎1
2023年,转一笔USDT需要15,000能量。2026年,同样的操作,同一个合约,要65,000。代码一行没改——凭什么贵了4倍?答案藏在TRON一个大多数人没听说过的机制里:动态能量模型。 这个机制本质上是个 隐形定价器:合约被调用的频率越高,单次执行消耗的能量就越多。USDT作为TRON上最繁忙的合约,自然成了能量黑洞。 但光靠它还涨不了这么猛。真正狠的是三重叠加:动态能量持续上调,TRX币价上涨,加上全网质押膨胀导致单位TRX产出能量被稀释。三者共振,硬是把成本推到了四年前的四倍。 TRON官方并非没动手。2026年能量单价调到了210 sun,每日免费带宽也提到了600。纸面参数很友好,可惜USDT合约的动态溢价像块吸水海绵,把网络层面的优化全吃掉了。搞懂这个机制比喊"贵"有用——下次能量暴涨,你知道该怪的是这条链的底层设计,不是钱包。 #TRON #动态能量模型 #TRC20底层机制
🔥3❤1
孙哥说TRON要做后量子升级,我第一反应不是"技术真牛",而是——我常用的那几个能量租赁平台,准备好了吗? 2026年4月,TRON宣布要成为首个实施后量子安全的主流公链,采用NIST认证的新型数字签名。听起来很高大上,但这事儿跟咱们普通用户有什么关系?关系大了。 这不是简单的功能更新,而是底层加密标准的切换——所有地址、签名机制都可能受影响。TRON网络上每天有220亿美元的USDT在转,858亿美元的稳定币市值,任何底层变动都会波及数百万用户。 能量租赁市场会因此洗牌吗? 很可能。平台需要适配新签名标准,用户旧地址可能需要迁移,技术落后的小平台可能直接被淘汰。现在问题来了:你现在租的能量会不会失效?你的USDT地址需要换吗?哪些平台已经在准备适配? 量子计算威胁听起来很遥远,但如果TRON真的要做全网加密升级,那些依赖旧地址、旧签名的服务会不会出问题?这不是技术新闻,是可能影响你钱包的实际变化。 能量租赁作为刚需服…
👍1
TRON能量租赁市场进入"毫秒级"时代 最近看到一个数据:现在租一笔65000能量只要3-4 TRX,而直接转账USDT要烧掉13.6-32 TRX。这个价差已经大到让人没法忽视了。 更关键的是到账速度。2026年主流平台都上了AI自动派发系统,从付款到能量到账基本控制在1-3秒。我自己测试过几次,确实比以前那种人工审核快太多,基本是秒到。 但有个坑要注意:如果你转账的对方地址是新地址(USDT余额为0),必须租双倍能量,也就是两笔。很多人第一次用会漏掉这个,结果能量不够,TRX照样被扣,转账还失败。 另外看到TRON生态最近有几个动向值得关注: 1. 链上USDT流通量已经突破800亿美元,稳坐全球第一 2. DeFi总锁仓量(TVL)超过44亿美元,JustLend和SUN.io都在做大规模产品升级 3. 能量单价从210 SUN降到100 SUN,这是社区投票通过的提案,直接砍了一半成本 现在的问题是:随着用户…
🔥1
🔥 冷知识:你转账被扣掉的 TRX,最后都去哪了? 很多人不知道,波场网络每天都有数以百万计的 TRX 被直接“燃烧”销毁! 为什么?因为每次转移 USDT,本质上是在调用波场的智能合约。如果你的钱包没有提前储备 Energy(能量),系统就会强制扣除你钱包里的 TRX。 💡 如何破局? 真正的高阶玩家,都会提前通过 So 能量机器人进行租赁能量。用极小部分的租赁费,完美代替动辄 15-30 个 TRX 的燃烧磨损!
⚠️ 小白避坑指南:波场常见的“零金额投毒”骗局! 最近看钱包,是不是常有陌生地址给你转 0 USDT?注意,这是骗子的障眼法! 😈 骗局原理:骗子用专门的脚本,生成与你常用交易对象“首尾字母一模一样”的假地址。当你习惯性去历史记录复制地址转账时,就容易把巨款打给骗子! 🛡 防范建议: 每次转账,务必仔细核对地址的中间字符,别只看首尾! 养成使用地址本的习惯,绝不直接复制历史交易记录。 ps:链上交易不可逆,安全第一! 转U前来So能量bot提前租赁能量,可以省下手续费哦。
❤1🍌1
你的USDT都放在哪?市面上主流 USDT 钱包大盘点! 去中心化热钱包 (Web3 钱包): 1.TronLink (波宝钱包) 2.TokenPocket (TP钱包): 老牌多链钱包 3.Trust Wallet: 币安 (Binance) 官方收购的去中心化钱包 4.MetaMask (小狐狸) 5.imToken
❤1👌1
https://t.me/so_trxbot?start=BNtUbno 新用户 租用能量 直达!!
🥰1
谁最需要用 TRX 能量?你在其中吗? 对于高频使用 USDT 的人来说,不租凭能量 就是白白烧钱! 承兑商:日均上百笔交易,使用租赁服务每月可省下几百上千 U。 跨境电商/外贸从业者:用低成本的 Energy 轻松完成大量的交易。 搬砖套利者:极低成本、秒级确认,不畏惧波场网络拥堵。 👉 结论:只要你经常在 TRON 链上活动,能量租赁就是你的必备降本工具!
🐳1
小白科普 什么是 TRX 能量租赁?为什么能省钱?💸 每次转账 USDT-TRC20,都在调用波场的 Smart Contract(智能合约),这需要消耗 Energy(能量)。如果你的钱包能量不足,系统就会强扣 13~28 个 TRX 作为 Gas Fee(矿工费)。 能量租赁的原理:大户将自己质押(Staking)产生的闲置能量,临时 Delegate(代理)给你的钱包。 直接转账:燃烧约 15~30 TRX(约 1.5 - 3 U)。 租能量转账:仅需极少量的 TRX 成本。 👉 结论:转账前先 Rent(租)能量,手续费立省 80% 以上!
稳定可靠的trx能量租凭 欢迎各位老板使用与光顾!🎆
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @sotrxv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“So 波场能量租凭服务” (@sotrxv), 18 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sotrxv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.