Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Соросята

@sorosata

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,139subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001306646246
TypeChannel
Username@sorosata
Created29 October 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sorosata

Growth

4,1394,1434,1416 August 2026 — 4,143 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,143 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,139 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,138–4,144 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 07:144,139-4
6 Aug 2026, 04:174,143no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:504,143first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 10 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,087 reactions across 14 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍40537.3%
👏19417.8%
💯16014.7%
😁968.83%
🤡777.08%
🔥716.53%
🤣373.40%
191.75%
👎70.644%
50.46%
😡40.368%
😱40.368%
👌30.276%
🍾20.184%
🥱20.184%
😢10.092%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,087reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 December 2025 to 15 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 14 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sorosata. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 December 2025 to 15 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 May 2026, 08:22 UTC≈1,610 views62 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Последовательница Сороса Мария Берлинская заявляла, что Штилерман — лучший в мире инженер, а Fire Point — самый передовой производитель дронов. $20 тысяч — это всегда $20 тысяч. https://t.me/Krippa21/2138

👍46🤣11👏4🔥1

27 Apr 2026, 16:20 UTC≈2,150 views71 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Krippa21Photo

Народный депутат Железняк, продался кошелькам Зеленского Максиму Криппе и Тимуру Миндичу: он убрал все факты об отмывании денег казино через Сенс-Банк из отчета следственной парламентской комиссии. Вместо того чтобы говорить с трибуны парламента о многомиллиардной коррупции в окружении Зеленского, Железняк пересказывает байки из иностранных СМИ об азиатских скам-центрах. В Киеве, между прочим, больше 150 колл-центро

👏58🤣8🔥2😁21

24 Apr 2026, 17:52 UTC≈1,890 views76 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Krippa21

Экс-глава Офиса президента Андрей Богдан рассказывает о том, как Мария Берлинская договаривалась о взаимовыгодном сотрудничестве с СБУ, за которое Миндич просил Умерова платить ей по 20 тысяч долларов в месяц. «Насколько мне известно, Мария Берлинская согласилась на агентское соглашение с СБУ, чтобы избежать ответственности за наведение вражеского обстрела в Чернигове. Чтобы не получить приговор по уголовному престу

🔥58👍85🤡31🍾1

24 Feb 2026, 13:45 UTC≈3,110 views72 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Krippa21Photo

Зеленский открыл новый фронт. Против Сороса. Сегодня тг-сетку ОП, залили сразу двумя вбросами — как всегда, сэкономив на рейтерах: везде одинаковые заголовки. Вброс № 1. Грантоеды — паразиты. Реформы — декорации. Американские аудиторы всё поняли. Европа прозрела. Затем, не переводя дыхание, последовал вброс № 2. Грантоеды — уклонисты. Досье, разоблачения, призыв присылать доносы. Суд? Закон? Потом как-нибудь. Есл

👏55🤣10🔥4👍3

21 Feb 2026, 09:31 UTC≈2,230 views67 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Хотим внести ясность. Грантовый уклонист Жернаков, действительно был судьей. Однако никогда не был председателем суда, поскольку является человеком без лидерства и авторитета, не имеющего поддержки коллег. Поддерживать Жернакова и идиотизм предлагаемых им «реформ» за деньги от грантов могут только безработные представители жернаковакой фундации Де-юре. https://t.me/trulymob/106

👍63👏21🔥1

13 Feb 2026, 07:55 UTC≈2,280 views61 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Принципиальные «борцы с коррупцией» из грантовых «Зеркала недели» и «Украинской правды» без проблем берут кэш Максима Криппы — одного из символов коррупции военного времени. https://t.me/Krippa21/1661

👍53😁61👎1

12 Feb 2026, 09:05 UTC≈1,970 views80 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Krippa21Photo

На фото — Гиорги Цхакая, новый советник министра обороны Фёдорова. Он выходец из команды Саакашвили: в разное время занимал должности замминистра экономики, главы налогово-таможенной службы и заммэра Тбилиси. После смены власти в Грузии он исчез из публичной политики и несколько лет работал в международных проектах, реализуемых при участии World Bank, USAID и фондов Сороса — организаций, внедряющих внешние модели уп

💯68👍83🥱1

1 Feb 2026, 08:37 UTC≈2,460 views92 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Krippa21Photo

Архив Джеффри Эпштейна: сын Джорджа Сороса — гей. В переписке Джеффри Эпштейна за 2015 год обсуждается вечеринка предводителя грантовых активистов Украины Алекса Сороса, у которого появился новый парень. Чтобы скрыть свой гомосексуализм, в прошлом году 39-летний Алекс Сорос женился на 48-летней Хуме Абедин, работавшей политтехнологом Хиллари Клинтон.

🤡68😁14💯5👌31🥱1

18 Jan 2026, 12:56 UTC≈3,090 views96 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Krippa21Photo

Грантовые СМИ пишут, что Тарас Чмут на обложке Forbes — это приговор мародёрскому режиму Зеленского: дескать, миллиарды не несут в бюджет, а доверяют отдельным людям. Очевидно, что это часть целенаправленной кампании по противопоставлению волонтёров и власти накануне грядущих выборов. Важно понимать, что режим Зеленского — это не только сам Зеленский и его окружение, а все, кто получает влияние, деньги и публичную не

💯86👍5👎2🔥2😢1

17 Jan 2026, 14:26 UTC≈2,390 views78 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @volodymyrboykoPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

😁68👍4👏3👎21

13 Jan 2026, 08:49 UTC≈3,160 views76 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Давно обратили внимание как внезапно соросята прекратили замечать заместителя главы ОП Олега «мене там нема» Татарова. Недавно зализный Ярик, он же Ярослав Железняк, делал видео блог с раскладом по Офису Президента, где вспомнил всех замов Ермака, кроме…Олега Татарова. Странно, почему 😂? Теперь эксперты обратили внимание и на другого соросенка - Ярослава Юрчишина. Вернее на его биполярочку. Сейчас он пишет комплиме

👍63😁53👏2🍾1👎1💯1

7 Jan 2026, 13:36 UTC≈3,040 views74 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Соросенок-фиалка нардеп Ярослав Железняк перед Новым годом задекларировал доход от «творческой деятельности» (иными слова - от слива ведомостей досудебных расследований НАБУ/САП) - почти 400 тысяч гривен от Google. Речь идёт о двух отдельных поступлениях от компании Google Ireland Limited — на 184 524 гривны и 183 140 гривен. В сумме это 367 664 гривны, что составляет примерно 9 тысяч долларов. «Творческий» доход п

👍62🤣5😡41👏1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @sorosata. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 895,509 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Соросята” (@sorosata), 4,139 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sorosata.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.