Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net -47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,951–4,012 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 15:36
3,958
-7
13 Sept 2026, 15:00
3,965
+1
9 Sept 2026, 12:56
3,964
-3
3 Sept 2026, 22:18
3,967
-7
31 Aug 2026, 11:06
3,974
-4
28 Aug 2026, 09:47
3,978
+2
25 Aug 2026, 09:52
3,976
-4
22 Aug 2026, 06:48
3,980
-1
19 Aug 2026, 05:33
3,981
-8
16 Aug 2026, 04:25
3,989
-3
12 Aug 2026, 21:53
3,992
-10
10 Aug 2026, 02:01
4,002
-3
7 Aug 2026, 09:01
4,005
no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:56
4,005
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 5 July 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 23s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,564 reactions across 18 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,316
27.0%
🤣
1,663
19.4%
😍
1,199
14.0%
👍
1,082
12.6%
😁
564
6.59%
😘
437
5.10%
🍓
257
3.00%
❤🔥
148
1.73%
🥰
129
1.51%
😢
94
1.10%
😭
83
0.969%
🤩
82
0.957%
😈
42
0.49%
🍾
40
0.467%
🤪
40
0.467%
💋
38
0.444%
💔
38
0.444%
😴
33
0.385%
😇
32
0.374%
💘
30
0.35%
19 further kinds
217
2.53%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,564 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2023 to 11 August 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
5.56%
1 of 18 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
33,500
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
22,000
over 17 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2023 to 11 August 2023. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Наверное, каждый из вас замечал загадочное свечение глаз своего пушистого друга в темноте?
Этому есть научное объяснение 🧐.
Светящиеся глаза кошки - это результат отражения света от слоя клеток в задней части ее глаза, называемого tapetum lucidum. Этот слой работает как зеркало, отражая свет обратно через сетчатку и увеличивая количество видимого света. Благодаря этому они видят в условиях низкой освещенности гораздо…
#AD
Наконец-то я смогла переиграть Соню!😂
Все благодаря пятновыводителю Easy Clean!
Удаляет пятна с ковров, одежды, мягкой мебели, борется с грибком и плесенью, убирает налет с кухонной утвари и все это одно средство по доступной цене! Не верите? Переходите по ссылке и убедитесь сами! Экологичный очиститель Easy Clean https://easy-clean.store/remover1?utm_source=youtube_shorts&utm_medium=bulat&utm_campaign=Sonyakisa8…
Вот зачем они так долго копают…
➖➖➖➖➖➖
That's why they're taking so long to dig…
P.S Вчера бот случайно удалил это видео 🥲 Пусть будет еще раз ,вдруг не все посмотрели 😄❤️
В дни, когда вокруг много суеты и постоянных забот, стрессов… есть одно надежное средство, которое может помочь расслабиться 🐈 ❤️
А вы знали, что есть Фелинотерапия или, как ее еще называют – «кошкотерапия»
🙏Спокойствие:
Когда твоя кошка сидит на твоих коленях и её мурлыканье заставляет забыть обо всех проблемах и просто быть здесь и сейчас.
🧸 Игра:
Игра с кошками - это отличный способ отключиться от повседневного х…
Нас с кошками ждет 7-ми дневный трип на машине !
На поезда туда ,куда нам нужно нет нормальных мест ,чтоб выкупить купе, и сложно добраться ,только с пересадками.
Но с нами еще и Гаара…😄
В самолеты мне нельзя в течении года по состоянию здоровья.
Поэтому едем на машине. 7 дней. Страшно представить как это будет.
Но мы выбрали комфортный маршрут с долгими остановками по 200-700 км в день.
Может у кого-то из вас был…
😘116🥰23💋17👍16❤14🤣6😎6🙈3
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @sonyatiktok8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sonyakisa8” (@sonyatiktok8), 3,958 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sonyatiktok8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
