Channel
@sonmisCHECK
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004392200300 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sonmisCHECK |
| Created | 24 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sonmisCHECK |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 7 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 8 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 6 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:53 | 6 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
36 reactions across 6 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5465313474336816593 | 7 | 19.4% | |
| custom 5465213865455284284 | 5 | 13.9% | |
| custom 5465253417809115144 | 5 | 13.9% | |
| custom 5463121962979060756 | 4 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5465313577416028418 | 4 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5463230891939620469 | 3 | 8.33% | |
| custom 5465427239430554020 | 3 | 8.33% | |
| ☃ | 3 | 8.33% | |
| custom 5463016040495607509 | 2 | 5.56% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔇 στʒыɞ ʜα «elowy flood» ..#_’☆〜（ゝ。∂） 𖥔 ݁ ˖ИТОГ: 8/10,всем советуем! 🤎обзоры флудов от сонми ,миты и нэи ..# （˶′◡‵˶）`✦ ˑ ִֶ 𓂃⊹ ➖➖➖➖ ➖➖➖➖➖➖ ⠀𓈒 ׂ ۫. 𝄞 ᥴᥰᥲᥴᥙδ᧐ ɜᥲ ᥰρ᧐ᥴʍ᧐ᴛρ! 💬 за проверкой писать @LanysiikLove 𔔀ᅠ ׄ𝅄 🤩 ⋮ ᶻ 𝗓 𐰁 ϐׁ𝗈𝗼ｓtׁׅ — αɳo⸝n— tׁׅiｋtׁׅ𝗼𝗄 》 #отзыв
custom 54653134743368165932custom 54631219629790607561custom 54632308919396204691custom 54652138654552842841custom 54654272394305540201
🔇 στʒыɞ ʜα «VARENIKI FLOOD» ..#_’☆〜（ゝ。∂） 𖥔 ݁ ˖ИТОГ : 3/10,не советуем 🤎проверка флудов от сонми и миты ..# （˶′◡‵˶）`✦ ˑ ִֶ 𓂃⊹ ➖➖➖➖ ➖➖➖➖➖➖ ⠀𓈒 ׂ ۫. 𝄞 ᥴᥰᥲᥴᥙδ᧐ ɜᥲ ᥰρ᧐ᥴʍ᧐ᴛρ! 💬 за проверкой писать @LanysiikLove 𔔀ᅠ ׄ𝅄 🤩 ⋮ ᶻ 𝗓 𐰁 ϐׁ𝗈𝗼ｓtׁׅ — αɳo⸝n— tׁׅiｋtׁׅ𝗼𝗄 》 #отзыв
custom 54653134743368165932custom 54631219629790607561custom 54652138654552842841custom 54652534178091151441custom 54653135774160284181
.🤩 𝅄 rᴜ𝗹ｅ𝗌 ⊱ ۫ ׅ ✧ не знание правил, не освобождает вас от ответственности ੭ 🤩﹕ просим соблюдать правила, что-бы во флуде было комфортно _’☆〜（ゝ。∂） 🙂🙂Любая пропаганда запрещена. Комфортно для всех будет лишь обмен мнениями, без навязывания чего-либо. 🙂🙂Пиар запрещен,нельзя пиарить тгк/чаты/группы/и т.д. , или всячески намекать о подобном, его можно делать только в том случае,если разрешит админ. 🙂🙂18+ ЗАПРЕ…
custom 54652534178091151442custom 54652138654552842841custom 54653134743368165931custom 54653135774160284181custom 54654272394305540201
🤎 𓈒 ׂ ۫.𝄞 💬 ɑׁׅｄ𝗺𝗂n 𔔀➖ _’☆〜（ゝ。∂） администрация и контакты для связи (˶˃⤙˂˶) （˶′◡‵˶）`✦ ˑ ִֶ 𓂃⊹ 𔔀ᅠ ׄ🤍1st admin Sonmi🦴❕𓈒 ׂ ۫. 𔔀ᅠ ׄ🤍2nd admin Mita🗯❕੭﹕ 𔔀ᅠ ׄ🤍3rd admin Neali☁️❕੭﹕ 🧁•┊ Sonmi🪽@LanysiikLove ׄ𝅄 ֮ 🍙•┊ Mita🐚 @melisslisa ׄ𝅄 ֮ 🍥•┊ Neali 🕸️ @Bibijan67 ׄ𝅄 ֮ ︶⏝︶ ︶⏝︶ ︶⏝︶ 🥛✧˖°𝅄 чтобы отправить флуд на проверку пишите любому из этих людей ’ :
custom 54652138654552842842☃1custom 54631219629790607561custom 54632308919396204691custom 54652534178091151441
🔇🔇🔇🔇🔇🔇🔇🔇🔇🔇🔇 ..#_’☆〜（ゝ。∂） 𖥔 ݁ ˖обзоры флудов от сонми,миты и нэи ..# （˶′◡‵˶）`✦ ˑ ִֶ 𓂃⊹ ➖➖➖➖ ⠀𓈒 ׂ ۫. rｕ𝗹𝖾𝗌 𝄞 💬 ɑׁׅｄ𝗺𝗂n 𔔀ᅠ ׄ𝅄 🤩 ⋮ ᶻ 𝗓 𐰁 ϐׁ𝗈𝗼ｓtׁׅ — αɳo⸝n— tׁׅiｋtׁׅ𝗼𝗄 》
custom 54653134743368165932custom 54630160404956075091custom 54631219629790607561custom 54632308919396204691custom 54653135774160284181
🎀｡ ﾟ ꒰ঌ 🌟 ໒꒱ ༘*.ﾟ ➖
☃2custom 54630160404956075091custom 54652534178091151441custom 54653135774160284181custom 54654272394305540201
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @sonmisCHECK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@sonmisCHECK named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SONMI’s CHECK” (@sonmisCHECK), 7 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sonmisCHECK.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.