Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 49 days, net -61. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,544–1,623 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 16:41
1,553
-7
17 Sept 2026, 12:59
1,560
-6
13 Sept 2026, 03:36
1,566
-4
9 Sept 2026, 07:55
1,570
-1
3 Sept 2026, 15:00
1,571
-7
31 Aug 2026, 13:48
1,578
-8
28 Aug 2026, 11:29
1,586
-4
25 Aug 2026, 04:04
1,590
-8
21 Aug 2026, 17:46
1,598
-2
18 Aug 2026, 11:42
1,600
-10
15 Aug 2026, 03:52
1,610
-3
11 Aug 2026, 17:34
1,613
-1
8 Aug 2026, 07:07
1,614
no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:47
1,614
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
155 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💘
73
47.1%
custom 5426894566672331133
49
31.6%
custom 5426931511981009618
33
21.3%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
14.3%
1 of 7 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
210
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
215
over 6 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFJVxASV
1
5 August 2026
5 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
❤️«Книга Паучихи» дочитана! Выложу отзыв в ближайшие дни,сейчас скажу,что история в целом мне понравилась,но расстроила открытая концовка,видимо стоит ждать вторую часть,потому что последняя строчка этой книги заинтриговала
Теперь думаю,что начать дальше..Наверное,если сегодня ничего не захочется,возьму что-то новое уже завтра^
🤩 Небеса не падают на людей,это люди падают в небеса,когда страшно и много грешат🤩🤩🤩🤩
⤷ 🎁 ˎˊ˗ Прочитано уже 207 страниц «Книги Паучихи»,мне очень нравится эта мрачная атмосфера с дэвами,мутантами и сатирами.Первые страниц 40 мне было тяжеловато вникнуть,но дальше все пошло,как по маслу,за день улетели 200 страниц)
Завтра буду дочитывать оставшиеся 130
⋆˚꩜。 Вчера дочитала «Новенького» и теперь только один вопрос..Как дождаться продолжения??Выложу отзыв в ближайшее дни,книга точно превзошла мои ожидания
Сегодня взялась за «Книгу Паучихи» Рики Иволки 👄
О чем::
Наследница павшего Дома Мэл спасается бегством вместе с дэвом Алактиром-тем, кого раньше презирала. Их связывает магическая связь: разорвать её-значит погибнуть. Чтобы отомстить предателям, герои пересекают пу…
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🤩
☀️ Распаковка
уже в тиктоке ☀️
⭐У меня появилось 5 новых историй от МИФа,они все такие маленькие,до 300 страниц,надо как-нибудь устроить марафон по книгам этого издательства
⭐«Королева лета,умри» Любовь Минеева - ура,наконец новинка автора у меня,безумно хочу ее прочитать,это детектив-русреал,аннотация безумно интересная
⭐«Мрачные жнецы вечного депортамента» Эдди Ка…
🦋🦋Сегодня получила 🦋🦋прекрасный бокс от Альпины с книгами Маи Сары
── .🌊Здесь дилогия "Терра" под одной супер-обложкой,а также аромат от популярного французского парфюмерного бренда POP✨ (такое я люблю)
│ Надеюсь в ближайшем будущем добраться до этих книг,интересно,что всех так цепляет,ведь фанатов у этой истории очень много! 🌊
Advertisementerid 2W5zFJVxASVForwarded from @emilia_won_vvPhoto
дорогие, мы дождались!
💟💟💟💟💟💟💟💟💟
на переиздание полюбившейся вам истории Диего и Селены в новом издании!
🤩 предзаказ в
читай-городе 🤩
промокод: ПЕРСИК до 31.08 скидка 25% на заказы от 2000 рублей
Буду благодарна за репосты💐
🤩🤩Вчера я 🤩🤩надеялась,что успею прочесть хотя бы 80 страниц,но книга захватила настолько,что за раз у меня пролетели 223 страницы-а это бОльшая часть книги
⋆.𐙚 Я вообще в шоке,как эта книга быстро идет,ощущение,что прочла страниц 40,а на самом деле уже 100…Такого у меня не было давно и я очень рада,что нашла такую книгу!!❤️
🤩 Сюжет идет интересно,главная героиня долго не думает,уже рассталась с одним и начала вст…
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @sonicsbooks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“♡ живу в книгах 🕯️” (@sonicsbooks), 1,553 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sonicsbooks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.