Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for صَـفـا

Channel

صَـفـا

@song0life

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,582subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001492325574
TypeChannel
Username@song0life
Created18 July 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/song0life

Growth

4,5674,5824,574.510 August 2026 — 4,567 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,571 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,582 subscribers10 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,565–4,584 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:154,582+11
10 Aug 2026, 13:334,571+4
10 Aug 2026, 00:304,567first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.35%
avg views ÷ 4,582 subscribers
Avg views / post
428
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held22 (6 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total9,422
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 21:36 UTC178 viewsread 12 August 2026

هل نطمئن إذ نعرف أم نزداد قلقًا؟ أفي المعرفة أمل أم يأس؟ هل هي طريق خلاص أم طريق هلاك؟ ولكن أولاً، هل نمتلك يقينًا أم شكًا؟ حقيقة أم افتراضًا؟ وسواء كان هذا أو ذاك، هل يقود إلى الخلاص؟ إنما.... أي خلاص؟ كلما ازددنا معرفة ازددنا شكًا، فكل معرفة شك. ومن يعرف أكثر يقلق أكثر، وييأس أكثر، ويهلك أكثر. كل معرفة جديدة شك جديد ويأس جديد. حتى لكأنَّ التفاؤل ليس سوى الجهل. حتى لكأنَّ الجهل هو الخلاص! المعرفة ليست ضوء النفق. شعا

11 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC201 viewsread 12 August 2026

لم أكن أملك غير هذه الأوهام. وحدها كانت ملكي. لكن حتى هي لم تعد لي. فلأنزل إلى أسفل النبع وأغسل وجهي. على البشر أن يحتفظوا بأوهامهم، أن يداروها فلا تغادرهم. سيحتاجون إليها لكي تؤنسهم. على البشر ألّا يزجروا أوهامهم. فَلْيحضنوها بحنان، وإلا ماذا يبقى لهم؟ الأوهام حياتُنا. فلنحتفظْ بها لكي تكون لنا حياة. سباني الوهمُ صغيرًا وطار بي، حتى خلتُ نفسي الطيرَ وكلَّ الأرض شجرتي. أردتُ تقويمَ المناخاتِ و تقليمَ العواصفِ وجزَّ ن

6 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC725 viewsread 12 August 2026

هسة حبابين اريد مسلسل كوري عائلي ريفي

6 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC689 viewsread 12 August 2026
File

إنها قصة مظلمة، قصة من تلك القصص الأليمة التي كثيراً ما تجري دون أن يلمحها أحد، كأنها أسرار خفية، تحت سماء بطرسبرغ الثقيلة، في الزوايا المعتمة المستترة من المدينة الكبيرة، وسط اصطخاب الحياة والأنانية الضاربة والمصالح المصطرعة والفجور الكالح والجرائم الخبيثة، في كل هذا الجحيم من الحياة المجنونة الشاذة. ويختم جورج هالداس كلامه بقوله: «إنها مدخل جيد إلى متاهة دوستويفسكي التي لا تشكل روايته «مُذَلَّون مُهَانون» إلا مرحلة

6 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC≈1,370 viewsread 12 August 2026

في بعض الاحيان اناس اوتوا النبل وكرم النفس، الا انهم عصبيون رغم كل ما في قلوبهم من نبل وكرم ينساقون مع حزنهم وغضبهم إلى حد التلذذ بالحزن والغضب، محاولين أن ينفضوا ما في نفوسهم مهما كلف الأمر، ولو بالإساءة إلى شخص بريء، بل إنهم ليفضلون أن يكون هذا الشخص أقرب الناس إليهم. - مذلون مهانون "دوستويفسكي"

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @song0life. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 187,306 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

حُبًّا للقراءة
@freebooksf · 204,889
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 11 August 2026
مكتبة المليون كتاب
@lovekotob · 496,132
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
خاتُون.
@iuoeil · 105,492
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“صَـفـا” (@song0life), 4,582 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/song0life.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.