8 measurements spanning 19 days, net -65. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,536–5,621 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Aug 2026, 10:03
5,546
-5
22 Aug 2026, 11:13
5,551
-10
19 Aug 2026, 00:46
5,561
-14
15 Aug 2026, 19:56
5,575
-20
12 Aug 2026, 09:53
5,595
-9
9 Aug 2026, 15:11
5,604
-7
6 Aug 2026, 04:16
5,611
no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:07
5,611
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.09%
avg views ÷ 5,546 subscribers
Avg views / post
338
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
22 (7 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
3,039
Reactions total
145
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 04:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
299 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
273
91.3%
🔥
15
5.02%
👍
4
1.34%
😱
3
1.00%
🥰
3
1.00%
👏
1
0.334%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 317reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Почему не получается делать маленькие шаги для ваших целей?
1️⃣обесценивание этих шагов раздутым внутренним нарциссом (а таких людей много)
2️⃣ нарцисс обесценивает маленькие шаги, так как они намекают ему на его ограничения, а также создают ему нелестный образ себя
Подробнее 👆🏻в аудио
Что делать?
✅изучить почему конкретно у вас такой раздутый внутренний нарцисс
✅медленно его начать сдувать, чтобы любой маленьки…
Что мешает вам начать делать регулярные маленькие шажки?
Давайте соберем 20 ❤️ и запишу вам подкаст на эту тему.
А у меня пока 7:17 по местном времени, и я уже в зале.
В июне у меня было 18 тренировок, в июле уже 21.
Расскажу как я систему маленьких внедрила в свою жизнь, и как что мне мешало сделать это раньше.
КАК ИЗБАВИТЬСЯ ОТ ОЩУЩЕНИЯ «Я НЕДОСТАТОЧНА?»
Пошаговая инструкция:
1️⃣Исследуем следующие вопросы:
Откуда мы это узнали? От кого? Кто самый главный источник?
Что могли делать важные значимые взрослые, что мы из их действий сделали вывод, что мы недостаточны?
2️⃣Определяем формулировку детского решения «я такая, потому что…»
3️⃣Проверка есть ли здесь игра?
Исследуем и узнаем вторичные выгоды убеждений
4️⃣Тест реа…
Под моим Reels сегодня оставили комментарий: «Мужчина может быть только либо верным, либо богатым, либо красивым».
И знаете, что я увидела? Очень яркую негативную установку.
Когда мы смотрим на такие слова со стороны, нам легко заметить, что это всего лишь убеждение человека. Но тому, кто живет с этой установкой, она кажется абсолютной правдой.
Если включить обычную логику, то утверждать, что существуют только так…
Почему постоянно попадаются не те мужчины?
Итак, начинаем с вами разбирать 2 главные ошибки в дейтинге и начнем с проблем с фильтрацией мужчин.
Когда вы думаете о том, чтобы начать переписку или пойти свидание, то неизбежное происходит процесс проекций: то есть вы что-то свое накладываете на других.
И тут происходит 2️⃣ развилки:
👉🏻страх контакта настолько большой, что отбор происходит так, чтобы никого не пропус…
2 навыка, которые необходимы, чтобы найти классного мужчину и построить гармоничные долгосрочные отношения - это:
1️⃣относиться к своей личной жизни стратегически (стратегический дейтинг)
2️⃣умение фильтровать мужчин
Если 1 из этих навыков отсутствует/глючит- будут проблемы в личной жизни.
С вас 20 ❤️ и расскажу про оба пункта👌🏻
Знаете, я уже 4 год живу в Европе , и чем больше тут живу, тем больше по маю насколько понятие возраста у нас в голове.
А еще это был интересный для меня момент осознать насколько я незаметно европеизируюсь.
#личное
КАК ИЗБАВИТЬСЯ ОТ СИНДРОМА САМОЗВАНЦА?
За синдромом самозванца скрывается страх разоблачения и наказания за «несоответствие».
Есть 4️⃣ ступенчатый алгоритм избавления от самозванца.
Рассказала про него в подкасте 👆🏻
Вы можете избавиться от него в терапии со мной как со своим психологом. Пишите терапия сюда @tech_sonaland1
пришлю вам всем подробности.
#подкаст_от_соны
❤6👏1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @sona_land. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А в вашей жизни был мужчина «ни рыба, ни мясо?» Это когда он вроде ничего плохого активно не делает, но и ничего хорошего особо тоже. Он как будто бы просто существует в отношениях, причем лениво
Даааа87%
Неа13%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Агрегатор инвест идей | pro.finansy @investforbegginers · 58,535 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
Дивиденды | pro.finansy @div_profinansy · 75,343 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sona_land” (@sona_land), 5,546 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sona_land.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.