Channel
@son_oleandra
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,063subscribers
+65 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001940519512 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @son_oleandra |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/son_oleandra |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 2,063 | +44 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 2,019 | +19 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:26 | 2,000 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 1,998 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:19 | 1,998 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (12 July 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 10,788 |
| Reactions total | 610 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
804 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5222064702992968788 | 311 | 38.7% | |
| custom 5451665958055722250 | 247 | 30.7% | |
| custom 5420343148113055602 | 152 | 18.9% | |
| custom 5422586280682740019 | 87 | 10.8% | |
| custom 5463285837456237077 | 7 | 0.871% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 804reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
я самая счастливая!!!!🤍 меня изобразила потрясающая художница! щас лопну от радости господи обязательно посмотрите её работы, это шикарно 🤍🗝️
custom 545166595805572225031custom 522206470299296878820custom 542034314811305560220
🤍Друзья, весной я наткнулась на прекрасную мастерицу украшений и хочу дать должное ее творчеству Я безумно люблю колечки, это моя слабость🧸
custom 545166595805572225044custom 522206470299296878833custom 542034314811305560226custom 54225862806827400198
нас с вами уже так много!🧸спасибо большое! 🧸 делать конкурс на 2к котят?)
custom 522206470299296878879custom 542034314811305560235custom 545166595805572225029custom 54225862806827400195
привет! 🤍 немного поделюсь происходящим: во второй половине июля поступило относительно много индивидуальных заказов на повторы, поэтому делала в основном их на данный момент у меня лежит 17 колец (из них 6 под заказ), колье (также под заказ) и один недоделанный кулон🤩 короче я как всегда переоценила свои силы, но все будет, я не бездельничаю и ничего не забросила! 🧸🧸
custom 522206470299296878840custom 545166595805572225027custom 542258628068274001921custom 54632858374562370774
Мелания просто замечательная и очень светлая девушка!!! 💘 я конечно же немного волновалась перед нашей встречей, но было предчувствие что все пройдет хорошо, и так и было! в конце уже разговорились про клуб романтики, всякие игрульки, фильмы и понивирус пхпхпхах не перестану удивляться что меня действительно замечают такие классные творческие девочки, это безумно приятно осознавать ✝
custom 545166595805572225022custom 522206470299296878820custom 542258628068274001914custom 54203431481130556025custom 54632858374562370772
🍥 🍥🧸🧸🧸🧸🧸🧸🧸🧸🧸🧸 Почти месяц назад впервые встретились с Евой, погуляли, а я получила от нее просто невероятные подарки^^ 💍💍💍 у Евы свой нежнейший 💍💍💍 бренд украшений 💍💍💍«Сон Олеандра» И это правда украшения из снов!! Сверкающий пейзаж из «Барби: лебединое озеро», я это не развижу🧸🧸 А подвеска и вовсе сделана под мою татуировку, это внимание к деталям>> 🪨🪨Ссылки на магазинчик 🍥 Телеграм канал 🍥 Группа в вк
custom 542034314811305560222custom 545166595805572225015custom 542258628068274001911custom 52220647029929687883
🤍🦢🪽
custom 522206470299296878835custom 545166595805572225016custom 542034314811305560210
такой красивый отзыв прислали на повтор двух колечек на заказ 😏 захотелось здесь тоже поделиться! 💕 кстати, 1-6 августа включительно я буду в другом городе в отпуске, так что если вы планировали делать заказ в эти дни, лучше написать заранее, а также отправок в эти числа не будет, но можно забронировать украшения из наличия <З по всем вопросам пишите @wholefckingworld 📔 #отзывы@son_oleandra
custom 54516659580557222505custom 52220647029929687884custom 54225862806827400194
🌟все изделия, доступные к заказу из наличия 🌫️ #наличие@son_oleandra по всем вопросам и для заказа пишите @wholefckingworld 📔
custom 52220647029929687885custom 54203431481130556025custom 54225862806827400194
🤩 такой заказ отправила недавно: повтор двух колец и колье 🤩 напоминаю, что полностью индивидуальные заказы я сейчас не беру, только повторы. но если вы хотите основу от одного колье, а кулон - от другого (или даже в дизайне какого-либо из колец), такое устроить вполне можно! по такому же принципу можно любое кольцо сделать как кулон на цепочке, если есть в наличии нужные камушки но на индивидуальную раскладку бус…
custom 522206470299296878831custom 545166595805572225023custom 542258628068274001916
на протяжении всего моего пути в создании украшений, начиная с 2022 года, мои изделия чаще всего описывали словом «нежные». даже когда я старалась создать что-то дерзкое и крутое, все равно их называли именно так и я внутренне возмущалась: «разуйте глаза! где они нежные??» мне это было непонятно и я не хотела это принимать ⭐️⭐️сейчас я наконец-то с ⭐️⭐️гордостью заявляю, что мои изделия супер нежные, как и я сама, …
custom 522206470299296878841custom 545166595805572225035custom 542034314811305560229custom 54225862806827400194custom 54632858374562370771
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @son_oleandra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 158,359 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“✧ сон олеандра ✧” (@son_oleandra), 2,063 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/son_oleandra.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.