Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for sombra.🔒

Channel

sombra.🔒

@sombraxv

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

54subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003308803691
TypeChannel
Username@sombraxv
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 7 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sombraxv

Growth

5458567 August 2026 — 57 subscribers10 August 2026 — 57 subscribers15 August 2026 — 58 subscribers23 August 2026 — 56 subscribers29 August 2026 — 54 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 22 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53–59 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 16:1154-2
23 Aug 2026, 11:3656-2
15 Aug 2026, 20:1858+1
10 Aug 2026, 07:0157no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:5357first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 7 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 42s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

361 reactions across 9 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52807555384670005413710.2%
custom 5282849004311322271369.97%
custom 5363952636993236667318.59%
custom 5431760399546487539318.59%
custom 5463206487935448860287.76%
custom 5343613041973946493267.20%
custom 5368399096375696344267.20%
custom 5431352467847680562236.37%
custom 5341647265507343067226.09%
custom 5420593450217139809215.82%
custom 5431426964055426987205.54%
custom 5280901666139311139195.26%
custom 5283007638928395495154.16%
custom 5224459976189185238133.60%
custom 522434207504194034382.22%
custom 543171686575797465051.39%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 361reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 5 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
35
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
30
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sombraxv. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 March 2026 to 5 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Apr 2026, 20:39 UTC237 viewsread 10 August 2026

буду рада рп/рк и вашим комментариям.🥹

20 Apr 2026, 20:39 UTC356 views49 reactions30 Starsread 10 August 2026
Video

my edits. #taehyung #v

custom 536839909637569634421custom 536395263699323666714custom 546320648793544886014

30 Mar 2026, 12:11 UTC436 viewsread 10 August 2026

буду рада рп/рк и вашим комментариям.🥹

30 Mar 2026, 12:11 UTC587 views53 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

-back2back. my edits. #jin #bts #worldwidehandsome

custom 536395263699323666717custom 542059345021713980917custom 546320648793544886014custom 53683990963756963445

26 Mar 2026, 13:33 UTC365 viewsread 10 August 2026

буду рада рп/рк и вашим комментариям.🥹

26 Mar 2026, 13:33 UTC531 views47 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

-ariirang. my edits #bts #arirang

custom 528075553846700054118custom 528300763892839549515custom 528284900431132227114

23 Mar 2026, 09:58 UTC295 viewsread 10 August 2026

наконец-то у меня руки дошли. буду рада рп/рк и вашим комментариям.🥹

23 Mar 2026, 09:58 UTC477 views60 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

-swim. my edits. #bts #arirang

custom 528284900431132227122custom 528075553846700054119custom 528090166613931113919

16 Mar 2026, 18:28 UTC314 viewsread 10 August 2026

старый пост, но не могу держать его в архиве…он мой любимый.

16 Mar 2026, 18:27 UTC539 views41 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

⭐⭐⭐^’ ì am venom and YOU are MĪNE.

custom 534361304197394649315custom 522445997618918523813custom 534164726550734306713

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sombraxv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,614,756 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“sombra.🔒” (@sombraxv), 54 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sombraxv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.