Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 11 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 10 December 2024 to 15 January 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @goodtraders. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,051–7,059 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 11:57
7,052
-3
8 Aug 2026, 03:03
7,055
-3
7 Aug 2026, 12:32
7,058
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:22
7,058
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
801
Videos
29
Links
329
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
194 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
99
51.0%
🔥
47
24.2%
❤
26
13.4%
💯
5
2.58%
🙈
5
2.58%
🤝
4
2.06%
👏
3
1.55%
🤔
3
1.55%
🌚
1
0.515%
🙏
1
0.515%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 194reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 December 2024 to 15 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
За всю свою жизнь я сформировал огромный список инструментов — все они дают мне возможность зарабатывать пассивно.
— Конкретно этот бот показывает лучшие результаты из всех моих источников дохода и является основным.
В течение последних пару дней бот стабильно торгует до 3% прибыли ежедневно. (Выше отчет ребят)
*Привлеченный капитал используется как оборотка для моей команды. Я смело могу сказать, что мы сейчас ном…
РЫНОК ЗАКРЕПЛЯЕТСЯ ПЕЧАЛЬНО 📉
Отсутствие геополитического позитива мешает рынку продолжить рост. Сегодня 13 день подряд, когда рынок закрывается ниже цены открытия.
Все ждут какой-то прорывной новости по переговорам, поэтому не продают, а сидят в лонгах. Для нас же рост или падение идет только на руку, мы не зависим от рынка. Нам важен спред (%) разница.
Неделя в целом завершается на максимально панической ноте дл…
🤯 Ошибка которую допускают 90% людей !
— Деньги, а конкретно (₽) рубли за год обесценились, а относительно долларов так вообще. При этом люди просто хранят деньги в ячейке, на счетах или под подушкой. Ребят, вы на пустом месте теряете свои же деньги.
Я всегда говорю: «Деньги должны работать»
— Я понимаю многие зарабатывают на своем направлении, тратят, откладывают деньги в ящик и ничего с ними не делают. Когда день…
Добрый вечер, Дмитрий Солодин на связи !
— Пропал на месяц, не просто так. Чтобы воплотить в реальность задуманное приходится прикладывать множество усилий и времени.
Напоминаю, что веду работу сейчас по арбитражу криптовалюты (P2P).
— Я говорил, что каждый из Вас сможет делать такие же результаты. И на сегодняшний день я могу смело заявить, что это ФАКТ и это РАБОЧИЙ и сверх прибыльный инструмент.
По сей день я …
ЦИФРЫ | ПРИБЫЛЬ | P2P
— У кого-то возникнет паника об упущенной возможности, БЕЗ ПАНИКИ !
— И так перейдем к ЦИФРАМ: проработали мы так вышло, что что-то около месяца.
— Бычий рынок, это идеальная точка входа и возможность очень хорошо заработать на P2P
! Думаю никого не прошла стороной новость о мемкоине $TRUMP ( на ней мы тоже очень хорошо заработали. Текущий президент США создал свою монету, а вы все еще думае…
МИФ ИЛИ ПРАВДА ?
Все говорят, что арбитраж давно умер и прибылью там даже не пахнет 🤣. Неделю назад на фоне бычьего рынка (роста рынка) решил попробовать вспомнить молодость и почувствовать себя начинающим арбитражником. Так вот с полного 0₽ и просто своих знаний я решил испытать себя и разбить миф об смерте P2P. Я взял: 4 телефона, 4 карты, и 550,000₽.
— И я начал их крутить: руками, без кешеров, без операторов. П…
🇨🇳 #Китай #нефть #макро
⚡️ В Китае сейчас происходит стремительное расширение парка электротранспорта, что может оказать существенное воздействие на глобальный спрос на нефть.
Подготовил для вас обзор данной темы - жду вас в комментариях к данной статье 👇
📌 ЧИТАТЬ СТАТЬЮ (свободный доступ)
🇩🇪 #макро #Германия
Продолжаем следить за экономической ситуацией в Германии.
⚡️Несмотря на то, что в последние годы было введено огромное количество солнечных электростанций, производство электроэнергии с базовой нагрузкой в то же время сократилось.
❓Результат?
☝️ Цены на электроэнергию резко растут зимой, потому что, несмотря на увеличение солнечной мощности, в темное время года солнечная энергия практически не…
Угадайте причину моего отсутствия, почему я ничего не анонсировал. Пишите варианты в личку 👉@solodin_dm
— Может я обанкротился и не нахожу рабочие инструменты для заработка денег 🤣? Жду ваши варианты !
— Все помнят, что где-то меньше полугода назад я создал команду по арбитражу (P2P - во всех его направлениях). Так вот мы давно ушли в масштаб и работа происходит ежедневно 24/7.
Друзья всех приветствую !
— Думаю многие заметили затишье от меня в плане инвестиций и прочих рабочих ресурсов. А все потому что это «затишье перед бурей»
— Доллар по 114₽ видели, а Биткоин по 100,000$, в целом рынок криптовалют летит в космос ✊
🤝К чему я, это все большие возможности, продолжим завтра.
#инвестиции #ликбез
Вчера в комментариях задали вопрос - а что делать, если доля бумаги в портфеле резко выросла? Ну вроде на ум сразу приходит мысль - ребалансировать, но не все знают как это делать 🤷♂️
Решил написать небольшую шпаргалочку - может новичкам пригодится:
📌 ЧИТАТЬ СТАТЬЮ (свободный доступ)
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @solodinx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@solodinx named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@solodin_dm named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@solodindm named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СОЛОДИН ДМИТРИЙ” (@solodinx), 7,052 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/solodinx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
