Channel
@solarcult
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,506subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001261210178 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @solarcult |
| Created | 15 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/solarcult |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 2,506 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:11 | 2,505 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 2,507 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 2,507 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 31 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (31 May 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,242 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
My take on the "Youth" of Mark 14:51-52 This solution is supported by scholars and by the broader mythological frameworks that were common at the time of the Gospel. (The stream dropped a few seconds in a couple spots but only a small amount) Watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAQwii35tIA • O'Gravy
Signed O’Gravy
The Burning Bush Wasn’t Originally a Bush? Part 2 uncovering the original meaning of the word for the burning "bush" of Exodus. It never was a bush, and the "labbat" within it may have been a known ritual euphemism. The whole lexical tradition around be-labbat esh ha-seneh must be reconsidered. https://youtube.com/watch?v=I3hO57WTLPc • O'Gravy, The Sun Riders @solarcult
Signed O’Gravy
https://youtu.be/QEAENGLYkZg?si=Qye2CZF8yBBbFVYu
Signed O’Gravy
Glad to see Awenyddau clearing up some baseless accusations. These folks work hard on their videos: real voice actors, artists, and writers all the way through. • O'Gravy, The Sun Riders @solarcult
Signed O’Gravy
The Burning Bush Wasn’t Originally a Bush? Part 1, will be continued in Part 2. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Vmjr4LMypUs&ra=m
Signed O’Gravy
Genesis Creation Events Borrowed from India? Rounding out the Bible-India borrowings, there are indeed Indian parallels to the Biblical creation. • O'Gravy, The Sun Riders @solarcult New stream watch: https://www.youtube.com/live/kTAuoTAgIvY
Signed O’Gravy
Another successful day at the extremely retarded contrarian take factory.
Signed O’Gravy
Socrates was the world's first Jew. He fought on the wrong side of a war against civilization, in works penned by a known subversive whom we came to know as "Plato." The Republic and the Apology are about Aryan destruction, and the Aryan's replacement by a Mercurial trickster. The New Ager's modernism obscures the dark reality at the heart of philosophy. The "Classical Greeks" were never the Greeks.
Signed O’Gravy
GYLFI the Demiurge and The Norse Absolute (Odin-Third) https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=byKwPYH1SD4&pp=0gcJCWQCo7VqN5tD&ra=m
Signed O’Gravy
If I'm right about Gylfi, then everyone looking for the Platonic Demiurge moment in Norse myth is looking in the wrong places. As often happens with the most esoteric myths, this moment has been placed in a euhemerized frame, a mundane disguise: as if this happened last Tuesday, when in reality Gylfi is given a name of Odin, Gangleri, and so is Odin as the Divine Demiurgic Nous, and the triple Odin who speaks to him…
Signed O’Gravy
Gylfi, who takes a name of Odin (Gangleri), may be equivalent to Fintan from the Settling of the Manor of Tara story, considering how Fintan/Finn is the usual parallel of Odin as a whole. This suggests that Gylfaginning isn’t a late invention, that Odin-Third may be equivalent to Trefuilngid Tre-eochair (“Triple Bearer Three-Edged”) who teaches Fintan the divisions of Ireland, which is the cosmic microcosm. Because…
Signed O’Gravy
https://youtu.be/E5W6purvC_M
Signed O’Gravy
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @solarcult. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 404,939 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“☀️The Sun Riders☀️” (@solarcult), 2,506 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/solarcult.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.