Channel
@solar_w
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
515subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001504131346 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @solar_w |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/solar_w |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 09:17 | 515 | -4 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 08:40 | 519 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:12 | 521 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 525 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 523 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 523 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 522 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
26 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5237891000348731797 | 21 | 80.8% | |
| custom 5238012994599807734 | 5 | 19.2% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Блин, короче, хотел наванговать выход ускорителей для Minimax H3. Типа, что сначала они оптимизируют какие-нибудь цифры, внутри самого вычислительного алгоритма. Потом значит выйдет турбо лора. А потом выйдет лайтингХ лора. Ну вот я наванговал уже после того, как все это произошло. Хотя я реально заранее все это знал.
custom 52378910003487317973
Чето uncanny происходит со статистикой
Video, posted without a caption
Ахаха вчерашний видос. Жду страйк. Самое интересное, что за последние несколько видео от меня отписалось около 1к человек.
A1S9B1I9N1M9D1N1D1
custom 52378910003487317971
Прошла всего пара дней, а для H3 выкатили ускоритель. Сам я его еще не юзал, но судя по этому видео, скорость съедает качество.
custom 52380129945998077342
Видели че творится в на ред сивите в странице H3? Если не то и не заходите.
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52380129945998077343
1 MPx, 24 fps x 4090 = 880 sec
custom 52378910003487317975
0.4 MPx, 5 sec, 24 fps x4090 = 130 sec Чета на сайте MiniMax'a походу стоит нехилый улучшайзер ибо вчерашний промпт он тупо протараторил и выдал такое. Ну вроде бы смотрится живее LTX'a, хотя к таким скоростям на таком разрешении я уже отвык. Ждем теперь лайтинг лоры походу.
custom 52378910003487317971
Тут пишут, что скоро контент польется бесконечным потоком. Хоть давно все уже льется и самый эффективный контент-завод — это человек с камерой и кучей времени и мотивации. Но по сути сказано верно. Потому что h3 это первая полноценная омни модель в руках именно таких людей с кучей времени и мотивации. То есть, возможности нормально обкатать принцип омни (когда в модель можно накидать все подряд, от звука до видео и с…
custom 52378910003487317973
Video, posted without a caption
custom 52378910003487317972
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @solar_w. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SOLAR.W 🐉” (@solar_w), 515 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/solar_w.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.