FAT CZ is being protected by @Safeguard Click below to verify you're human

Channel
Solana KOLs Tracker 👀
@solanaKols1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002207468261 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @solanaKols1 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 16 July 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/solanaKols1 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:48 | 2 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 2 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 101
- Videos
- 16
- Links
- 291
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
0x5afe0017Bab23C096772387e4309a41Daf87Ad66 Took a gamble on this one at 70k no info
Notifications on fwens, I will put "should be gem"
Aped $VANCE on sol. NFA CA: 3NPN3DrN2JdDmuDWy7mhy4ufrJbTceafTFGVwaJ3zuPD https://dexscreener.com/solana/5s5cmyxhj6cuscbgx7eusdd75c1mg37uz5qkvjkuzzkh https://vpvancesol.com/ https://x.com/VanceonsolCto
If your a real active Hit this https://x.com/dior100x/status/1813169115101556917?s=46
Photo, posted without a caption
https://x.com/dior100x/status/1813167666883944561?s=46
https://t.me/uniteamerica_portal https://x.com/UNITEAMERICA_ER https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/112786191989780006 https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x5ecafACC1951a3b399bfA0937d79684f1F135a1F
You guys got it early btw Tavern got it even earlier ;)
Told u guys when my balls itch they itch good
Moonshot
https://x.com/dior100x/status/1813153872203944013?s=46
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @solanaKols1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Solana KOLs Tracker 👀” (@solanaKols1), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/solanaKols1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.