两条狗 都改用户名了 不敢用自己的用户名了

Channel
【这个是骗子大家小心】开元棋牌 招商总部【这个是骗子大家小心】 @BTC889899 @kaiyuan889989 @sol668899
@sol668899
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003933990326 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sol668899 |
| Created | 26 May 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sol668899 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 4 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 3 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 3 | first reading |
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
大家小心这个开元的招商,我是站长,25年6月份我在他这里开的线,前三个月佣金都结算的非常快,我也一直在推,第四个月负盈利达到120万了,结果这个王八蛋开始给我下级的用户发短信,让重新开户给彩金,然后还和上面说这个代理被抓了,现在线无人管了,操他妈的!大家开线一定别找他!!!@BTC889899 @sol668899 这俩都是他的号!@sol668899 这是骗子的频道 骗子 最新ID @aadd1471 @kaiyuan1111 @BTC889899
【这个是骗子大家小心】开元棋牌 招商总部【这个是骗子大家小心】 @BTC889899 @kaiyuan889989 @sol668899 pinned Deleted message
Channel created
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @sol668899. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 995,147 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“【这个是骗子大家小心】开元棋牌 招商总部【这个是骗子大家小心】 @BTC889899 @kaiyuan889989 @sol668899” (@sol668899), 4 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sol668899.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.