Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,445–3,482 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 13:16
3,460
+3
13 Sept 2026, 18:18
3,457
+3
10 Sept 2026, 08:15
3,454
+5
5 Sept 2026, 02:20
3,449
-2
1 Sept 2026, 08:36
3,451
-5
29 Aug 2026, 14:34
3,456
-2
26 Aug 2026, 23:13
3,458
-10
24 Aug 2026, 01:45
3,468
-10
20 Aug 2026, 09:47
3,478
+2
17 Aug 2026, 18:07
3,476
+1
14 Aug 2026, 15:34
3,475
-2
11 Aug 2026, 07:26
3,477
+2
7 Aug 2026, 23:45
3,475
no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:36
3,475
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 32s
Average length
46s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
87 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
54
62.1%
🔥
14
16.1%
🙏
10
11.5%
😁
5
5.75%
💅
2
2.30%
😍
2
2.30%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодня радуем вас подборкой наших учеников курса "Скетчинг"!
Вы же не забыли, что у нас есть курс и по базовой базе баз?)
На Скетчинге мы изучаем перспективу и как ее рисовать от примитивов до объектов реального мира любой сложности, ведь зачем примитивы, если не для того, чтобы изображать окружающее нас? (и выдуманное, но эту подборку мы позже покажем)
В этой подборке вы как раз видите отрисовку самых разных пре…
Пока снимала процессы параллельно с отрисовкой марафона, случайно сняла полную отрисовку носа в профиль за 1 минуту 😅
Здесь как раз пример туториала - в видео показываю, что делаю, и объясняю сами шаги, так что каждый сможет повторить то же самое
Однако в уроке, конечно, объясняю иначе: не просто шаги, а почему именно такие, а как увидеть и применить эту же универсальную схему на других ракурсах, на каких принципах…
Ребята, я с новостями: "Персонажа", возможно, больше не будет...
За 2 года его существования помимо него накопилось еще много материалов: это, например, марафон100 по фигуре человека и по головам. И меня настойчиво не покидает мысль, которую я, честно говоря, уже начала реализовывать:
я хочу разделить "Персонажа" на "Человека" и "Животных" отдельно 🤌
Я по прежнему считаю, что учиться рисовать человека и животных м…
Новая подборка работ наших учеников курса "Персонаж. База" 🫠
В эту подборку попало целых 2 точки А-Б по человеку! Обратите внимание, что стартовые точки Ксении и Алины уже были сильными, однако после прохождения курса фигура стала более рельефная, пропорциональная, детализированная. В каждой линии буквально видно уверенность и четкое понимание, как рисовать человека!
Важно, что на курсе мы проходим всю фигуру целик…
Пара лайфхаков и полезных настроек для прокриейта ⭐️
- быстрый перенос слоя в другой файл
- как отключить двойное нажатие на Pencil, которое вызывает ластик
Новые потрясающие работы наших учеников курса "Персонаж. База"! 😍
Здесь мы снова подобрали разные уроки из разных модулей - и человека, и животных, и финализацию, а также урок по смене поз, где показываю и рассказываю, как можно двигать позу, как конструктор 😉
Это дает свободу в рисовании, к которой все стремятся ⭐
Но сначала - перед сменой поз и рисования без референса - конечно же, нужно разобраться, как рисоват…
❤8🔥4
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @sokolovajuschool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой формат вам бы больше подошел для ваших целей?
Еще не проходил Персонажа, разделение мне было бы лучше и удобнее!19%
Еще не проходил Персонажа, но хотелось бы пройти комбо человек+животные33%
Я проходил Персонажа, думаю, разделение было бы удобнее и понятнее12%
Я проходил Персонажа, думаю, комбо было удобным хорошим форматом19%
просто хочу сделать *тык*17%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🌱 Kera Shi 🌱 @kera_shi_art · 35,228 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 2 September 2026
Бесплатные кисти procreate @brushprocreate · 52,590 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Обучение рисунку и иллюстрации | SOKOLOVAJU” (@sokolovajuschool), 3,460 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sokolovajuschool.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.